The Confederate Flag

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

The Confederate Flag Is,...

  • a symbol of racism.

  • a symbol of freedom.

  • a symbol that was once racist, but now no longer is.

  • I am a raging moron.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
You seem to think so, otherwise, why bring up Sanger?

Bada-Bing!

The difference really couldn't be more stark. PP has openly renounced Sanger's offensive remarks. The South has never denounced the Confederacy but rather idealized & glorified it, held to many confederate values about race all through the Jim Crow era & on into today.

Krugman links a very interesting piece-

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/20...Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
lol that's fucking nuts.

PCism has run crazy., Anytime i start talking about digging people up you really need to stop and ask if that is needed LOL

No, you are fucking nuts to support a monument to a racist slave owner traitor war criminal. And you are double nuts to expect Memphis, which is 63% black, to host such a monument just because some racists put it up during Jim Crow days.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146
But the same should apply to the Confederate Flag. Racism/slavery vs killing blacks. I don't care what year it's in.



But, whatever, I'm done.

well, slavery is slavery. the institution only ever existed along a spectrum of horrible to downright evil.

the eugenics movement wasn't simply "what Hitler thought we should do."

As I mentioned earlier, this was the primary paradigm in the earliest days of Genetic discovery. It wasn't about "Creating a master race," and certainly didn't involve "murdering and cleansing inferior races."

The idea was that favorable traits could be effectively enforced through selective breeding. Yes, this type of theory (bear in mind that much of the work at this time was all thought; very little applied science in those days) would lead to discussions about a singular perfect type of human, and of course there were fringe wackos coming out of the woodwork to latch on to parts of this field and take it to the next level (like Hitler), but this was long before any real understanding about genes actually worked.

This was before we even knew what the DNA molecule looked like. There is so very little one can understand about function, prior to understanding form. Prior to knowing how to work with it.

Anyway, once we learned that "bad genes" generally weren't all that bad, that the real benefit of sexual reproduction is creating real diversity in genetic information, even with the "bad genes," eugenics was tossed into the dustbin. Well, that, and the only true believers were certified psychonutballs.

As for the confederate flag, it really has only ever signified one thing. Frankly, I don't see why it can't continue to exist on one's belt buckle, at their house, on their lunchbox, but it makes no sense to fly as the symbol of an incorporated government entity. It's just, horribly bad form. I'm not saying this in a judgmental fashion (I have too much sympathy for and history in the south, and I certainly know that it isn't a racist symbol for lots of people: meaning, it can still be racist--and it is--but it's perfectly reasonable to understand that it doesn't mean, or is not used as a racist flag to others. I get that; as weird as that sounds)..

Hey, it could be worse--Mississippi has it on their actual state flag...and I do believe Georgia does as well, right?
 
Last edited:

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,596
476
126
OP.

you forgot the "The South shall rise again... and then get their asses handed back to them.. again." option.


....
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146
*^ I should clarify up there: I'm not trying to sugarcoat the eugenics movement by saying well, there were a few bad apples, and it really wasn't all that bad...it was bad. It was wrong from the beginning, it was bad science, and it certainly spawned some evil, murderous motherfuckers. So there's a real responsibility on that movement, not just for "bad science," but for encouraging some very evil shit.

Point is that many communities have dark pasts that we have to address and hopefully learn from and move on. As a geneticist, this is something that I guess I identify with. Science, though, is pretty good about moving on and reforming the paradigm when it happens to be wrong, which is really why science works so well. I'm also a southerner; my paternal grandmother a staunch antebellum, hyper-racist, old south type of woman. This is just something I grew up with--"that was just grandma!" She is also a Mayflower girl, which I think makes me 13th gen mayflower, or something (different name, though; but the reality is that biology is more important than name when it comes to lineage--so fuck that dusty old club if they want to deny me a certificate! :mad:)

...and look at that list of "eugenicists"up there: a rather diverse collection of people linked to this theory, which shows just how wide the movement varied:

Winston Churchill--certainly wouldn't call him evil; he was probably an asshole (like all politicians), but seemed like an alright guy, otherwise.
Francis Crick--OK, this guy was an unapologetic dickscarf. fuck that guy, and Watson, too.
Hellen Keller--Wait, are we allowed to say bad things about Hellen Keller?

anyway, no one alive today in the US, or posting here, owned slaves, lynched anyone, or donned a white hood (well, there was that one guy). I doubt there are any eugenics supporters around here (Well, not since spidey self-banned. fuck it, I'll just say his name), so none of this is to point fingers at what anyone's ancestors did in the past. None of us are responsible for any of that.

We are responsible for learning from the past, though. And moving on; and hoping that we are made better for it.
 
Last edited:
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
I don't think so. Perhaps you should think about that and then perhaps answer the fucking question.

Sanger is a contemporary of at least some of those folks. What's the difference between her and them (other than being an American right wing 'talking point')?
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146
I don't think so. Perhaps you should think about that and then perhaps answer the fucking question.

While you weren't the first to bring her up in this thread, what exactly were you suggesting by this comment?

At the very least, Margaret Sanger should be looked at with a jaundiced eye imo. Read the section on Eugenics and Race.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger#Controversies

So...just use the non-judgmental jaundiced eye? :hmm:
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
No, you are fucking nuts to support a monument to a racist slave owner traitor war criminal. And you are double nuts to expect Memphis, which is 63% black, to host such a monument just because some racists put it up during Jim Crow days.

LOL i didn't say shit about the monument. I said when you go so fucking PC crazy you start thinking DIGGING UP DEAD people is a good idea you need your fucking head checked.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146
LOL i didn't say shit about the monument. I said when you go so fucking PC crazy you start thinking DIGGING UP DEAD people is a good idea you need your fucking head checked.

at first, I agreed with you...but the fact that his corpse was already dug up once to be moved there, for some reason (as a direct "fuck you" to the Civil Rights movement, actually; and well, we do this often, moving corpses back and forth, you know?), makes me think...eh, whatever.

Confederate General? I think that is fucked up.

Oh, that general also happens to be a founder of the KKK? ....and he's buried in Memphis, which is 60% Black? oh.

well, hmm. fuck those bones.


So, if this fuckhole's dead bones were moved to this spot in the 60s, simply as a middle finger to blacks seeking equal treatment under the law....then, well. Wait. WHY THE FUCK IS HE STILL THERE?
 
Last edited:

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
LOL i didn't say shit about the monument. I said when you go so fucking PC crazy you start thinking DIGGING UP DEAD people is a good idea you need your fucking head checked.

It's part of whole monument complex, statue and grave. And Memphis wants to move it to a cemetery, not a junk yard.
Mayor Wharton wants the statue of Forrest and his burial plot on Union Avenue moved to the historic Elmwood Cemetery in south Memphis. The final resting place of about a dozen other family members...
t should be noted nearly 1,000 Confederate soldiers, about 20 Confederate generals, and two Union generals are buried at Elmwood Cemetery.
Certainly if that cemetery is good enough for two generals who fought for America, it's good enough for a racist war criminal traitor klan leader?
You do also realize he was dug up to be brought up to the monument in the first place to honor and white wash the Confederacy during the Jim Crow days?
Nathan Bedford Forrest's grave has been at its current location since 1904.
He died in 1877.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Oh please...it never ends with people like you. Discussion is impossible.

If you'd care to actually discuss something that's fine with me.

Now, what was the point of bringing up Sanger and her eugenics beliefs and why are her beliefs important to note while others who believed the same thing should be dismissed?

btw, "people like me"?
 
Last edited:
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
If you'd care to actually discuss something that's fine with me.

Now, what was the point of bringing up Sanger and her eugenics beliefs and why are her beliefs important to note while others who believed the same thing should be dismissed?

btw, "people like me"?
If you're truly interested in discussion, please answer my original question instead of attempting to divert into a slamming the right wing. Or do you find that too difficult?
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
If you're truly interested in discussion, please answer my original question instead of attempting to divert into a slamming the right wing. Or do you find that too difficult?

How am I diverting into slamming the right wing? Have I said anything about the right wing?

I'm just curious as to the reason that Sanger is a part of the discussion about the Confederate flag and what it represents, that being a 'country' that considered slavery to be a cornerstone of it's existence.

No, you can't 'judge' Sanger by moral/ethical standards of today. But then Sanger never tried to found a country based on the enslavement of others did she. And, the Planned Parenthood of today has nothing to do with her past belief in eugenics unlike how significant parts of the modern South still cling to the racist beliefs and symbols of the past.
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146
Does that concept elude you?

review my long posts about eugenics.

now, what do you think about my command of this concept of the jaundiced eye?

or, continue to deflect from a rather snicker-worthy misstep that you just made over a series of two posts.

whatever. I don't give a shit.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
Hey I can buy an SS white on black flag at Amazon. Just not the confederate flag. Lol fail Murica.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,648
29,307
146

impressive. not much resistance around that area, for her and her partner to be able to get to the flag, climb up, and do that without being interrupted.

Have to admit that I'm surprised that the open carry brigade haven't been out in full force defending their flag the last week; much less state police/security...or maybe both the state and people in SC don't care as much about that flag as we are supposed to believe they do? :hmm: