Russia on brink of ... NOPE! Russia INVADES Ukraine!

Page 1226 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,253
16,479
146
Can one of you military folks explain to me this Triumph system Ukraine blew up with missiles and drones? What kind of shit system is it that costs 1.2B USD and still can't fucking intercept jack shit?

Or was it 1.2B rubles?
From my understanding it's similar to our patriot system, semi-modular with radar components, control/integration components, and actual launchers that can vary in count. It sounds like this one was bristling, with a bunch of ammo to boot. As for why it failed at its job? No idea, UKR tactics combined with 'because Russia'? And no, that was $1.2B USD. It was a very high profile kill, relatively speaking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A///

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,850
46,233
136
Ukraine has hit ships at sea, too. You seem to forget this. Drones don't need to be multi million dollar units we deploy ourselves. You may want to do some reading up on newcomers to the market that are snapping up DOD contracts like wildfire. Alongside UK and Aus governments. Creating fear in the enemy is enough for them to constantly ponder and look up opening themselves up to fuck ups in the field that get them within crosshairs or easy to eliminate in other ways.


Send out loitering munition drones with a high range which exist and which are deployed in ukraine, they find a target, nose dive and cut the engine in waves to minimise noise. Boom. Bus of troops, tanks, heavy anti air gone within seconds. Price per unit is going to be cheaper than risking troops or your own heavy hardware.

It took forever for the administration to grow some balls and send cluster munitions to Ukraine. Cheap, effective, and will litter Ukrainian fields with future Russian origin fertilizer. There's a news site out of Virginia that caters to easy to digest news. defensenews. You can query drone on there and read up about the advanced. 5-50K per shot/kill loitering drones and ucavs under $3m are the new era of weaponry. Reducing risk to soldiers on the ground and minimising the loss of more expensive equipment made to achieve the same or similar result.



lol ok


For someone who wants to critique my posts you sure don't sound like you've read any of them. I'm still surprised a post of mine that didn't mention strategy, tactics, or even particular weapons has you on this kind of rant. Feelin ok? I mean that is quite an assortment of irrelevant cherries you picked there.

Tell you what, I'm going to forego how I usually deal with trolls and shit talkers. Please refer to any number of my posts here in this thread and then compare them to what you just posted. Let's call it an exercise in intellectual honesty, shall we? Show me your opinion is worth well, anything.
 
Last edited:

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,083
45,061
136
From my understanding it's similar to our patriot system, semi-modular with radar components, control/integration components, and actual launchers that can vary in count. It sounds like this one was bristling, with a bunch of ammo to boot. As for why it failed at its job? No idea, UKR tactics combined with 'because Russia'? And no, that was $1.2B USD. It was a very high profile kill, relatively speaking.

This is the second S-400 to get hit by Neptune, a subsonic cruise missile that the system certainly should be able to engage. Indications are that drones were used to disable the site's radars but that triggers the question of why the system could not target the drones or why the site was not protected by a complementary short range system.

They only lost a TEL, some ammo, and possibly have damaged sensors this time but still highly embarrassing for a system they always proclaimed to be invincible. The bulk of the system might have survived but still they shit the bed for all to see again.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,241
7,854
136
^^^ Haven't there been indications that at least some of the drones are small and made of materials radar can't see well, but can carry enough stuff to make a mess?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,083
45,061
136
^^^ Haven't there been indications that at least some of the drones are small and made of materials radar can't see well, but can carry enough stuff to make a mess?

There was a video of one of the drones and it seemed fairly sizable so I kinda doubt that it would have been invisible to radar.
 

Pipeline 1010

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,973
794
136
There was a video of one of the drones and it seemed fairly sizable so I kinda doubt that it would have been invisible to radar.

I wonder why they don't just land a drone on top of say a semi truck that might be on a road traveling in the direction of the target. Once you get within a couple hundred meters, the drone can take off and the defense systems won't have time to react. Or have the drone hover behind/close to a car that is driving near the target. Maybe I'm thinking too simplistically.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,486
9,710
136
BTW, regarding the reasoning... and cause of this war.
I noticed a detail that I had not known of before, coming from this.

Behind the scenes in Zelenskyi’s office just before the invasion

The Biden Administration was especially and unusually vocal about the looming Russian threat. It had first sounded an alarm in March and April 2021, when Russia began massing thousands of personnel and military equipment near its border with Ukraine and in occupied Crimea.
Look at that. Mere weeks into the Biden administration. Not after Trump lost the election. But after Trump's attempted coup over the United States government failed. Once Putin's puppet was truly out of power. Once Trump could no longer deliver a splintered and destroyed NATO. The moment that was no longer possible, Putin gave the order and Russia started its preparations for the full scale invasion.

Trump AND the insurrection factored into Putin's plans.
Do not underestimate the threat of what Republicans can deliver for Russia. This entire Genocide was planned around it.
Listen to Republican media, every single day they attack Ukraine, slander Zelensky and pave the way for stabbing Ukraine, Europe, NATO in the back.
The moment Republicans gain enough power, they will side with Russia. Treason.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,850
46,233
136
Well well well...

Senate to give Musk a thorough probing...

“The committee is aggressively probing this issue from every angle,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) said in a statement. The announcement comes just before an expected visit by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the U.S. Capitol next week. Musk, who wields control over a large number of active satellites, claimed this week that he would have needed U.S. approval to activate Starlink technology in occupied Crimea. Ukrainian and U.S. officials have blasted Musk for withholding the satellite tech: “Neither Elon Musk, nor any private citizen, can have the last word when it comes to U.S. national security,” Reed said in his statement.


Musk seems to think a South African is entitled to at least some words though. I guess now it's our turn to scare the little dipshit.
 

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
lol ok


For someone who wants to critique my posts you sure don't sound like you've read any of them. I'm still surprised a post of mine that didn't mention strategy, tactics, or even particular weapons has you on this kind of rant. Feelin ok? I mean that is quite an assortment of irrelevant cherries you picked there.

Tell you what, I'm going to forego how I usually deal with trolls and shit talkers. Please refer to any number of my posts here in this thread and then compare them to what you just posted. Let's call it an exercise in intellectual honesty, shall we? Show me your opinion is worth well, anything.
I don't judge people with mental health issues. I've seen your posts before. They're not that interesting. Although I do like the ones where you essentially smack grasshopper around. We all pray his mouth let's go of Putler's ballsack.
 

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
I wonder why they don't just land a drone on top of say a semi truck that might be on a road traveling in the direction of the target. Once you get within a couple hundred meters, the drone can take off and the defense systems won't have time to react. Or have the drone hover behind/close to a car that is driving near the target. Maybe I'm thinking too simplistically.
Like a trojan horse attack? The vehicle would have to be going the direction you wanted it to go. Ideally a tall vehicle like a lorry where the drone or drones can sit amongst themselves and lift off as they get close to the target. There's videos of Ruskis in Crimea checking underneath cars but they aren't inspecting the tops of lorries.
 

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
Listen to Republican media, every single day they attack Ukraine, slander Zelensky and pave the way for stabbing Ukraine, Europe, NATO in the back.
The moment Republicans gain enough power, they will side with Russia. Treason.
I think this was known by day one for those of us in the middle or the left. Going back several years, long before Trump, there was a bizarre admiration for Russia and Russian politics by those on the right. I didn't pay much attention to it myself being an expat but still voting in local and federal elections and assumed it was fringe politics. To say the Russian interference in our politics began with Trump's announcement for the run at the presidency would be wrong. I think we need to back further to find the source of when Ruski interference began in this country. Early Obama administration, Bush? Clinton?

In international politics and interference there's a concept of China's century of humiliation at the hands of other countries and how they want to serve retribution for being "wronged" by those countries. I can see Russia being the same. They were terribly humiliated losing the cold war and the USSR crumbling, and keep getting embarrassed on the international stage. Our troops making mince meat out of Wagnercrooks a few years ago was talk of the town. When Ruzia realises they have no reason to keep fighting a war they lost in the first week it's going to destroy the fiber of their being. It'll be a massive power vacuum inside Russia and a dangerous situation. It'll be a long road, especially for their brainwashed citizen.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,850
46,233
136

That's an old pic of him, his head is like twice that wide now. I wonder if he finally over dosed on something. Ukrainians were saying he went on a bender, ended up walking around in his pajamas, out of his gourd, got picked up by FSB. They said Putin ordered a detox, stat. I didn't give it much thought, 'prolly just propaganda.'

If true and it was the detoxs I've heard of opiate addicts getting, they come with risks. There's a chance you don't make it if there for alcoholism and opiates I think. Maybe others too not sure. I wonder if that's what happened. Guy has been off his rocker lately, but Putin needs him. If he's not sane and reliable anymore then he's a liability. Can't have the Chechens declaring independence again, certainly not while they're in the process of being driven out of Crimea. Goodbye Russian Federation.
 
Last edited:

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
Well well well...

Senate to give Musk a thorough probing...

“The committee is aggressively probing this issue from every angle,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) said in a statement. The announcement comes just before an expected visit by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the U.S. Capitol next week. Musk, who wields control over a large number of active satellites, claimed this week that he would have needed U.S. approval to activate Starlink technology in occupied Crimea. Ukrainian and U.S. officials have blasted Musk for withholding the satellite tech: “Neither Elon Musk, nor any private citizen, can have the last word when it comes to U.S. national security,” Reed said in his statement.


Musk seems to think a South African is entitled to at least some words though. I guess now it's our turn to scare the little dipshit.
I wonder if he understands the gravity of his actions. He's done and said a lot unrelated to this war that makes you question whether he has a firm grasp on reality. Do we have any laws or acts that allow the government to take over a company for national security reasons?
 

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
From my understanding it's similar to our patriot system, semi-modular with radar components, control/integration components, and actual launchers that can vary in count. It sounds like this one was bristling, with a bunch of ammo to boot. As for why it failed at its job? No idea, UKR tactics combined with 'because Russia'? And no, that was $1.2B USD. It was a very high profile kill, relatively speaking.
Do you think it was a matter of luck and undertrained Russians without any concept of layered defense manning the equipment and opening themselves up to attack? Should be easy going for Ukraine in a few months if they can keep this kind of pressure up and come in with aircraft later to decimate whatevers left of Russia on their land.
 

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136
I wonder if he understands the gravity of his actions. He's done and said a lot unrelated to this war that makes you question whether he has a firm grasp on reality. Do we have any laws or acts that allow the government to take over a company for national security reasons?
The closest I can think of is the Defense Production Act, which allows the president to specifically order production and services from a company to be prioritized for the US government, as needed to promote the national defense, but doesn't allow actually taking over a company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A///