Minsk 1 said that BOTH SIDES would cease hostilities. Neither side ceased hostilities. Once of the flaws of Minsk 1 was that it didn't set out control of all contested areas. Russia also failed to withdraw their "little green men." Just as a point of order Minsk offered nothing like Taiwan-esque status. Nor should it have... Taiwan is a de facto independent country that the PRC is determined to retake. Giving the DNR/LNR a similar status would be exactly what you decry, because Ukraine would always be threatening to retake them by force.
Let me try to explain this one more time. Was it Vladmir Putin, or the former president of Ukraine and Angela Merkel who basically admitted it was a sham agreement? So it is irrelevant if neither side ceased hostilities when one side basically never intended to implement it. Get it?
Any criticism of LNR/DNR/Russia for failing to implement? For continuing combat operations? Any suspicion that they signed to build up their forces? LOL nope, because you're a Russian shill.
Remind me again why a nuclear power would use this agreement, not implement it and use the time to build up for their forces against Ukraine? Has Putin said this was the intent? Last time I checked he hasn't said this, but a former president of Ukraine and Prime Minster of Germany sure have.
Also you're incredibly blind to the politics of such agreements. Countries sign agreements they don't intend to fulfill all the time. Since you're so upset by this, could you give your thoughts on the Budapest Memorandum?
Budapest didn't account for the possibility of NATO expanding to Russia's borders, backing a coup attempt by right-wing Nazi's, armed by NATO. Everything was fine in Ukraine before that right? Right.
And again, NOTHING IN MINSK PRECLUDED WEAPONS TO UKRAINE. Only a massively disingenuous person would keep bringing this up as some kind of violation.
Here you go again mentioning Minks, which from Ukraine's perspective is irrelevant because they had 0 intention of implementing it even before it was signed.
How does Ukraine not implementing Minsk benefit Ukraine? Your entire theory is that they signed it with no intention of implementing it to somehow gain an advantage. What was it? How would it have worked? If implementing would have given Ukraine an advantage, shouldn't you be happy that they failed to do so?
It does not benefit Ukraine. It benefits NATO/US because they tried to pull Ukraine into it's 'sphere of influence'. You guys keep thinking this is about Ukraine. It isn't. It's NATO vs Russia and Ukraine is just the battlefield. NATO has been doing everything they can to go to war with Russia, from continued NATO expansion eastward for decades, launching coup attempts and installing western puppet presidents, and continuing the flow of weapons and putting them on Russia's borders.
Could you please point to a single person acting like this war started in February? We're all very aware that Russia invaded and stole Crimea in 2014 along with instigating and supplying a civil war with men and weapons in LNR/DNR.
That was Russia's response to the west backing a coup to overthrow a democratically elected president of Ukraine, which borders Russia. You think the US would stand idle if Russia backed a coup and ended up toppling the Mexican/Canadian president and putting a Russian puppet in place? The US lost its shit when they found out USSR was setting up missile silos in Cuba.
How about this. How about we stop meddling in other country's affairs and mind our own business for once? The US government has/is:
-Overthrew Saddam Hussein
-Overthrew Gaddafi
-Backed a coup which overthrew the president of Ukraine in 2014
-Bombed the fuck out of Afghanistan for 20 years and lost
-Bombed the fuck out of Vietnam and lost
-Bombed the fuck out of Iraq, a war which saw over a million people killed
-Currently, ILLEGALLY occupying a third of Syria
-Tried to overthrow Fidel Castro
-Tried to overthrow Hugo Chavez several times
-Tried to overthrow Nicolas Maduro several times
And now fueling a proxy war for a non-NATO country. Do you see the problem here? We're the problem. We go around bullying other nations, for reasons that don't benefit the people, but benefit defense and fossil fuel industries.
There was a poll a few years ago asking which country posed the greatest threat to world peace. Can you guess which country came out on top?
And The Award For 'Greatest Threat To World Peace' Goes To ...
www.huffpost.com