Conservatives love serial sexual harassers

[SNC]

President of the United States and an office intern - the disparity of power is so vast that many would argue that consensual sex is not really possible. Modern day feminists would agree that the disparity of workplace power trickles into feeding a gender imbalance of power as well, and that when the man pursues the relationship he is basically subjugating the woman. Eventually they will feel trapped and will not be able to break the relationship off, and then it turns into harassment. Bill Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with that woman, puts her in a terrible position, coming forward is defying the POTUS. This is how predators like Bill C and Bill O are able to flourish, they use their stature to quash any disgruntled women they leave in their wake. It's disgusting.

I commend you for holding Bill O to account, but it is shameful that you are not able to realize what happened with Bill C. I feel sorry for you, that you so incredibly obliged to protect your party. Cast the bad ones to the wolves, just as the conservatives are doing with Bill O. You will feel better for it.

I was going for that sentiment but there was not enough coffee in the veins at the time of that typing.

 

[VRAMdemon]

Lol @ O'Reilly. He's had instances of sexual harassment levied his way since 2003. He will blunder like over sexed teenagers in his efforts to get sex from women who look down on him as a silly old man. These men (O'Reilly , Ailes) are all quite unattractive and lack charm or any other redeeming feature. Except money. Sorry Bill, after a decade or so of harassing women, when are you going to realize these women don't want to -fuck you.

 

[agent00f]

So Monica's boss having her suck his dick in the Oval Office is perfectly OK with you and just an act of casual sex? But Bill O trying to get some hoochie is a degenerate? Sooooo where is the difference in your mind? Both of them had to have a similar thought; 'hey I wonder if she's into me, I bet I could get some of that!' So at this point they are both guilty of the same thing, nothing. I'm pretty sure we can agree on this. The next thing that happens is they let the hotties know they are interested in some extracurricular activity, while no real crime has happened, unless asking a girl out is now a crime if you're married and their boss. I am pretty sure we still are in agreement, yes? Over at the WH with Bill C, M shoves a cigar up her coochie while Bill C pulls his pud. While over at Fox, Juliet smacks Bill O's face and calls a lawyer. Here is where the difference is, now explain why there is a huge level of support for Bill C and not so much for Bill O. The only difference is the end result and of course the power level between a sitting president and a talk show host, would you not agree?

As for the degenerates comment, a) I've not watched a complete segment of O's show ever, just as I've never watched a left leaning talk show through to the end. So quit with the assumptions, unless you like looking like an ass. b) You seem to have forgotten Mel Reynolds and Barney Frank just to name two. There should be no R and D when it comes to violating someone, but people like you prefer to play favorites with your side. You do realize that they don't give a fuck about you right?

President of the United States and an office intern - the disparity of power is so vast that many would argue that consensual sex is not really possible. Modern day feminists would agree that the disparity of workplace power trickles into feeding a gender imbalance of power as well, and that when the man pursues the relationship he is basically subjugating the woman. Eventually they will feel trapped and will not be able to break the relationship off, and then it turns into harassment. Bill Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with that woman, puts her in a terrible position, coming forward is defying the POTUS. This is how predators like Bill C and Bill O are able to flourish, they use their stature to quash any disgruntled women they leave in their wake. It's disgusting.

I commend you for holding Bill O to account, but it is shameful that you are not able to realize what happened with Bill C. I feel sorry for you, that you so incredibly obliged to protect your party. Cast the bad ones to the wolves, just as the conservatives are doing with Bill O. You will feel better for it.

Thanks for demonstrating that degenerates can't tell the difference between sexual promiscuity and what they need to do to get some. Makes perfect sense why this sort of sexual predation is culturally endemic to american conservatism and how it persists at fox et al.

 

[momeNt]

Thanks for demonstrating that degenerates can't tell the difference between sexual promiscuity and what they need to do to get some. Makes perfect sense why this sort of sexual predation is culturally endemic to american conservatism and how it persists at fox et al.

Paula Jones ring a bell? I understand you are obliged to protect but surely somebody as educated as even you should remember Paula Jones and the impeachment of Bill Clinton? That was settled too. Just like Bill O'Reilly.

 

[agent00f]

Paula Jones ring a bell? I understand you are obliged to protect but surely somebody as educated as even you should remember Paula Jones and the impeachment of Bill Clinton? That was settled too. Just like Bill O'Reilly.

Let me know when O'Reilly can claim this: "Eventually, the court dismissed the Paula Jones harassment lawsuit, before trial, on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate any damages... Wright ruled that Jones failed to show that Clinton's actions constituted "outrageous conduct" as required of the tort"

Contrast that to your pal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBu1b_GpXM8

 

[alien42]

President of the United States and an office intern - the disparity of power is so vast that many would argue that consensual sex is not really possible. Modern day feminists would agree that the disparity of workplace power trickles into feeding a gender imbalance of power as well, and that when the man pursues the relationship he is basically subjugating the woman. Eventually they will feel trapped and will not be able to break the relationship off, and then it turns into harassment. Bill Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with that woman, puts her in a terrible position, coming forward is defying the POTUS. This is how predators like Bill C and Bill O are able to flourish, they use their stature to quash any disgruntled women they leave in their wake. It's disgusting.

I commend you for holding Bill O to account, but it is shameful that you are not able to realize what happened with Bill C. I feel sorry for you, that you so incredibly obliged to protect your party. Cast the bad ones to the wolves, just as the conservatives are doing with Bill O. You will feel better for it.

odd that you didn't even mention that the current President said this...

“I did try and fuck her. She was married, I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married"
"And when you’re a star they let you do it, Grab them by the pussy, You can do anything.”

 

[agent00f]

odd that you didn't even mention that the current President said this...

“I did try and fuck her. She was married, I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married"
"And when you’re a star they let you do it, Grab them by the pussy, You can do anything.”

Worth reiterating that o'reilly defender said this all publicly, and his degen peers are already planning to for vote for him again. They're the reason why america is not great, and have every intention of keeping it that way per selfish ideological mandate.

 

[momeNt]

Let me know when O'Reilly can claim this: "Eventually, the court dismissed the Paula Jones harassment lawsuit, before trial, on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate any damages... Wright ruled that Jones failed to show that Clinton's actions constituted "outrageous conduct" as required of the tort"

Contrast that to your pal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBu1b_GpXM8

Defend until the end. As you are obliged to do. Why did he settle out of court then?

 

[momeNt]

odd that you didn't even mention that the current President said this...

“I did try and fuck her. She was married, I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married"
"And when you’re a star they let you do it, Grab them by the pussy, You can do anything.”

Disgusting what men with power and celebrity will sometimes do to take advantage of women. Who here thinks that any of those women truly "Let" him do it? Surprising that in one breath we can all unanimously condemn Trump for being a pig. And then in the next defend Clinton until the bitter end. I understand that you as a people are obliged to protect those you serve. But please. Break the shackles and call a pig a pig. These are disgusting men who don't need protection. I've come around on this. Where are the rest of you?

 

[agent00f]

Defend until the end. As you are obliged to do. Why did he settle out of court then?

Disgusting what men with power and celebrity will sometimes do to take advantage of women. Who here thinks that any of those women truly "Let" him do it? Surprising that in one breath we can all unanimously condemn Trump for being a pig. And then in the next defend Clinton until the bitter end. I understand that you as a people are obliged to protect those you serve. But please. Break the shackles and call a pig a pig. These are disgusting men who don't need protection. I've come around on this. Where are the rest of you?

I'm curious if your sorts actually lack the mental facilities to discern between Clinton/philandering vs. O'Reilly/Ailes/Trump predator, or this is the typical degenerate playing dumb. It's just hilarious that these degens who've have kept him/them at #1 in cable news for decade+ after those tapes/transcripts first surfaced would ever pretend to be moral.

Pretty obvious Clinton settled due to prevalence of such degeneracy in our country.

 

[alien42]

Disgusting what men with power and celebrity will sometimes do to take advantage of women. Who here thinks that any of those women truly "Let" him do it? Surprising that in one breath we can all unanimously condemn Trump for being a pig. And then in the next defend Clinton until the bitter end. I understand that you as a people are obliged to protect those you serve. But please. Break the shackles and call a pig a pig. These are disgusting men who don't need protection. I've come around on this. Where are the rest of you?

no one has been defending Clinton's actions, that's pure BS made up by you, but you still can't try and equate Bill Clinton's actions to Bill O'Reilly's, Roger Ailes and the culture at Fox News.

 

[momeNt]

no one has been defending Clinton's actions, that's pure BS made up by you, but you still can't try and equate Bill Clinton's actions to Bill O'Reilly's, Roger Ailes and the culture at Fox News.

Read the post above yours. He's the standard bearer for progressives drowning out the reasonable voices such as yourself.

 

[Jhhnn]

Defend until the end. As you are obliged to do. Why did he settle out of court then?

Because the suit never was about alleged sexual harassment of Jones but rather about tearing down Clinton. Jones lawyers colluded with Starr's investigation to do that. He'd already been impeached & the people actually paying for the suit saw no point in continuing. When they offered to settle for a figure Clinton could afford, he took it.

 

[alien42]

Read the post above yours. He's the standard bearer for progressives drowning out the reasonable voices such as yourself.

the post above mine didn't defend Clinton's actions and actually made the exact same point as my post. i do like to think of my self as a reasonable voice though, which means i disagree with the vast majority of your positions.

 

[agent00f]

Read the post above yours. He's the standard bearer for progressives drowning out the reasonable voices such as yourself.

The reason why degenerates equate decades of sex predation by their own to philandering by some other guy is pretty transparent.

Rather apropos Fox News specialized in teaching "fair and balanced" conservatives how to do this, as evident through the arguments of their disciples here.

 

[Svnla]

Fox to investigate the allegation - https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-inve...claim-against-oreilly-004348852--finance.html

 

[SNC]

Thanks for demonstrating that degenerates can't tell the difference between sexual promiscuity and what they need to do to get some. Makes perfect sense why this sort of sexual predation is culturally endemic to american conservatism and how it persists at fox et al.

So I'll ask my question a different way, you are OK with workplace "promiscuity" so long as it's a successful attempt, but if it's it not received well then its a degenerate act. It might help to clarify your position if you could share your thoughts on sex between a cop and a woman pulled over for speeding or a jail guard and an inmate. You seem to be hooked on calling others degenerates but those you are labeling are NOT supporting Bill O, but saying that Bill O and Bill C are both scum and deserve the same fate. So far as I can tell there are only a couple people here wanting to hang Bill O while kissing Bill Cs ass, you among them. I'm struggling to understand how denouncing workplace sexual advances, successful or not, gets one labeled a degenerate, but being OK with someone in power over another and getting some side action is OK because he has a D next to his name puts one in a position to apply that label. Your acrobatics knows no bounds.

 

[agent00f]

So I'll ask my question a different way, you are OK with workplace "promiscuity" so long as it's a successful attempt, but if it's it not received well then its a degenerate act. It might help to clarify your position if you could share your thoughts on sex between a cop and a woman pulled over for speeding or a jail guard and an inmate. You seem to be hooked on calling others degenerates but those you are labeling are NOT supporting Bill O, but saying that Bill O and Bill C are both scum and deserve the same fate. So far as I can tell there are only a couple people here wanting to hang Bill O while kissing Bill Cs ass, you among them. I'm struggling to understand how denouncing workplace sexual advances, successful or not, gets one labeled a degenerate, but being OK with someone in power over another and getting some side action is OK because he has a D next to his name puts one in a position to apply that label. Your acrobatics knows no bounds.

Looks to be quite the competition between the degenerates of who can pretend to be the dumbest to never understand how predation differ from promiscuity. Just a heads up that demonstrating expertise at passing for drooling imbeciles with zero social awareness only says something about the nature of degeneracy.

Also very noteworthy that with all these posts on the topic of long running predatory culture at Fox, it comes as no surprise degens still only want to parrot the talking point about Bill Clinton instead; O'Reilly and Fox would be proud of that legacy no matter what happens to him.

 

[ch33zw1z]

In terms of Bill C vs. Bill O....I think the main difference is political party affiliation. Cons claim to be the party of conservative morals, based on their religious roots....and Dems really don't for the most part.

When faced with offense after offense, it's seemingly more difficult for the Con base to "flip" on their designated leaders.

From what I can tell, most Dem's have no problem calling out their leaders when issues are brought to their attention.

 

[agent00f]

In terms of Bill C vs. Bill O....I think the main difference is political party affiliation. Cons claim to be the party of conservative morals, based on their religious roots....and Dems really don't for the most part.

When faced with offense after offense, it's seemingly more difficult for the Con base to "flip" on their designated leaders.

From what I can tell, most Dem's have no problem calling out their leaders when issues are brought to their attention.

As one difference among many, the promiscuous aren't in the habit of cutting off careers of women who don't oblige them, which is a recurring theme with the fox predators.

There's good reason why little degens parrot talking points they're told by big degens, because it sometimes works.

 

[SNC]

Looks to be quite the competition between the degenerates of who can pretend to be the dumbest to never understand how predation differ from promiscuity. Just a heads up that demonstrating expertise at passing for drooling imbeciles with zero social awareness only says something about the nature of degeneracy.

Also very noteworthy that with all these posts on the topic of long running predatory culture at Fox, it comes as no surprise degens still only want to parrot the talking point about Bill Clinton instead; O'Reilly and Fox would be proud of that legacy no matter what happens to him.

So you are saying its who does it and not what is actually done. It occurred to me while I was on the shitter that all of this might be my fault. I'm forcing you to talk about a subject you have no direct understanding of, except of course what you've read and seen on the interwebs. You have this twisted thought process that allows you to believe that because the act happened and no one cried foul its an ok act, while that very same act if not as well received is bad. You have to understand how attracting a woman actually happens, and its clear that you don't understand the mating process well enough to discuss it intelligently, so you lash out. Perhaps one day you'll have a date or two and can then speak more intelligently on the subject. But it's clear you are just applying a political filter to your comments, and while its fun to watch it more like watching a train wreck that a cute puppy playing with a kitten.

 

[agent00f]

So you are saying its who does it and not what is actually done. It occurred to me while I was on the shitter that all of this might be my fault. I'm forcing you to talk about a subject you have no direct understanding of, except of course what you've read and seen on the interwebs. You have this twisted thought process that allows you to believe that because the act happened and no one cried foul its an ok act, while that very same act if not as well received is bad. You have to understand how attracting a woman actually happens, and its clear that you don't understand the mating process well enough to discuss it intelligently, so you lash out. Perhaps one day you'll have a date or two and can then speak more intelligently on the subject. But it's clear you are just applying a political filter to your comments, and while its fun to watch it more like watching a train wreck that a cute puppy playing with a kitten.

Resorting to worthless blustering isn't going to help you here any more than it did that time you couldn't figure out simple arithmetic for days. In fact it's probably never helped you in life, and only proves that crowd can never learn anything.

 

[momeNt]

Looks to be quite the competition between the degenerates of who can pretend to be the dumbest to never understand how predation differ from promiscuity. Just a heads up that demonstrating expertise at passing for drooling imbeciles with zero social awareness only says something about the nature of degeneracy.

Also very noteworthy that with all these posts on the topic of long running predatory culture at Fox, it comes as no surprise degens still only want to parrot the talking point about Bill Clinton instead; O'Reilly and Fox would be proud of that legacy no matter what happens to him.

Gentlement, we have a Weiner of the thread. Sorry, winner. Little bit of a slip there. Weiner just happened to be one of the promiscuous types. A good old boy, if you will. Such a good boy he forgot he wasn't a boy and shouldn't sext 15 year old girls.

Again though, I concede that you agent, are the Weiner, sorry, winner, of the thread. Us degenerates stand alone as the single source of sexual predators, while those with enlightenment ideals, simply enjoy the pleasures of promiscuous sex. Carry on folks.

 

[agent00f]

Gentlement, we have a Weiner of the thread. Sorry, winner. Little bit of a slip there. Weiner just happened to be one of the promiscuous types. A good old boy, if you will. Such a good boy he forgot he wasn't a boy and shouldn't sext 15 year old girls.

Again though, I concede that you agent, are the Weiner, sorry, winner, of the thread. Us degenerates stand alone as the single source of sexual predators, while those with enlightenment ideals, simply enjoy the pleasures of promiscuous sex. Carry on folks.

Weiner must be the degen backup after blaming Clinton failed. I'm sure Fox/O'Reilly is somewhere on that list behind every non-conservative Fox can conjure up.

 

[momeNt]

Weiner must be the degen backup after blaming Clinton failed. I'm sure Fox/O'Reilly is somewhere on that list behind every non-conservative Fox can conjure up.

O'Reilly is behind only Bill Cosby, who, for the purposes of this conversation, I am actually considering a conservative, even though he basically is a democrat, he is just too good to let go. If you must claim him though, I am still able to defend him via the BothSides™ proxy argument.