- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,791
- 136
Nah. I'm no.9 which means that whatever I do, I remain poor while everyone else around me gets rich!lol your post have been feeding so many of these sites I hope they are cutting you a cheque or some stock options![]()
Pretty impressive it can hit 11.4 GHz at only 40 W...![]()
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms Core i9-14900KS by 12% with unlimited power settings - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X at 160W matches Core i9-14900KS at 253W Comparison from AnandTech leaker. Courtesy of PCGamesN/TechPowerUP There’s another leak featuring a non-official sample of the Ryzen 9 9950X. AMD has partially lifted the embargo on architectural details, but the company has yet to allow...videocardz.com
O M G !!!
The lies! They never end!
View attachment 103405
View attachment 103406
Oh, the unbearable agony of going through all the screenshots! I hope he didn't end up in hospital. Real journalism is so hard these days!
I suppose it does a little? R23 does not sure about r24, my ram was at XMP 2 8000Does your score change with ram speed?
No. I anticipated max OC -30CO ST score not ~StockNot impressed?
While my ST only saw a 120->126 score going from jedec 4800 to fast tuned ram, MT sees a much larger gain. I'll run it real quick for reference.R15 through R23 doesnt scale with RAM speed at all. Its why the 9950X ES leaker ran his R23 at 4800MT/s. Actually helps the score a tiny bit by feeding less power to memory, thus having more to give to CPU.
I think R24 does a little bit, probably no more than 2% - 3%.
i was spot on. Nice work by AMD for an x86 CPU
I mean Apple does up to 144 at 4.06GHz on the M3 series.Not impressed?
8000/2133, unsure about timings. My config is 6400CL30 tuned 2133 fclk^^ Interesting.
Igor what RAM config was used for the ES R24 run? I dont see it on the HWinfo screen.
I went over a couple of detailed reviews of Raphael CPUs where it was shown that the effective clocks in ST load like SuperPI for the two best cores reached 5700-5750 MHz at stock and 5850 MHz with +100 PBO boost and a tuned curve, with Fmax 5850 and 5950 respectively. Looks like something is really wrong with the setup where the ST clocks can't exceed 4650Mhz.While my ST only saw a 120->126 score going from jedec 4800 to fast tuned ram, MT sees a much larger gain. I'll run it real quick for reference.
Yes, we'll know for sure, although I was asking why you assumed that the VRM voltage is held at a fixed value, while the telemetry indicated otherwise.The rate at wich the score increase as he increase power, we ll know more once Computerbase do their review since they ll make tests at 45, 65, 88 and 142W like they did for the 7950X.
It runs 5650 in CB 2024 ST. In other singlethreaded workloads, it can 5700 or 5750. FMAX/peak reported frequency when unloaded hits 5850.I went over a couple of detailed reviews of Raphael CPUs where it was shown that the effective clocks in ST load like SuperPI for the top two cores reaches 5700-5750 MHz at stock and 5850 MHz with +100 pbo boost and a tuned curve, with Fmax 5850 and 5950 respectively. I think something is wrong with the setup where the ST clocks can't exceed 4650Mhz
So is it good yet? I've not recovered from the 32% hangover .Nah. I'm no.9 which means that whatever I do, I remain poor while everyone else around me gets rich!![]()
I was off here. the tuned score was from memory. It's actually 2,190.While my ST only saw a 120->126 score going from jedec 4800 to fast tuned ram, MT sees a much larger gain. I'll run it real quick for reference.
4800 JEDEC - 1,950
6400 Tuned - 2,280
It's the best Zen yet at 300WSo is it good yet? I've not recovered from the 32% hangover .
That's very interesting (emphasis mine).The updated design was introduced by Mark Papermaster, AMD's chief technology officer, and he began by pointing out that the changes culminated from its collaboration with Samsung, which licenses AMD's graphics tech for the Exynos range of smartphone and tablet processors.
hahaha, men in black will be round soon