Really, you STILL don't see the difference? I don't know when you will then. Maybe if you get a pre-existing condition and get kicked off insurance, you will see it, but even then you may still pretend it's "both sides."
I saw this post over the weekend and wanted to respond but never found the time. I'm a few pages late and a few people have touched on this already but I'd like to emphasize it loud and clear. I know you were told that the DNC email hack exposed foul play against Bernie, but it is not true.
You aren't listening. They got ALL the emails. You can look at every single email. I just told you about the ONLY email that when spun correctly could support your claim but when viewed objectively does not even come close to supporting it.
If as I say the origin of evil lies in language branding of children, it follows, I think, that some have been made to swallow greater of lesser lies about their self worthlessness. If so then people vary in the severity of this kind of delusional sickness. It seems to me then that the greater the force requited to break children, the greater the contempt they will feel for themselves and the greater that is the greater it will be for others. I believe that self hate is virtually universal but varies in the degree to which people act out, with some it becomes criminal in intent. I don't see everybody being equally cruel or equally suppressed in their willingness to do violence. So I don't really care that you slam democrats because to me that is conditioning. What I object to is if you try to justify it. To me that is one machine blaming another machine for being a machine. To forgive the other machine is to forgive yourself. Before that can even have a chance of happening there needs to be an end to blame.
It doesn't matter. Rich people donate for a multitude of reasons. Even if you can prove they donated for the express purpose of gaining influence, which you can't, you still have to prove that they did indeed gain influence and again, you can't.
Ultimately, you have to look at the policy coming from each party. Republican appointees voted for Citizens United, and Democratic appointees voted against it. Republican appointees voted to allowed corporations to force workers into arbitration, Democrats voted against it. Republicans voted to create $1T deficit to pay for corporate tax cuts, Democrats voted against it. This is after all the money Democrats took from corporations, Democrats politicians still consistently vote against corporate interests and Republicans consistently vote for them.Right. I will work against the drug cartels by getting into power. To get into power I need to raise money from the cartel.
You guys are funny for sure
I agree. The Clinton bias in the DNC was the same Clinton bias in democratic primary voters, the result of the liberal brain defect and the same inability to see it as conservatives are blind to their own. There is nothing like superior capacity for reasoning to when it comes to manufacturing a condescending sense of self superiority that over and over again costs liberals elections. All that is needed to defeat democrats like that is some titanic bozo to come along and tell them to fuck themselves in the ass. Liberals, the elite clown class.
I read what you refer to as points and found them not to be points at all. I find that addressing points delivered as points when have no point to be tiresome to address. I therefore made up some non points to you that I felt reflected the relevance of your own content. You rejected that and I responded again and you rejected that. So here we are again. I see no point in addressing what you call points and I call pointlessness. Perhaps if you take what I said and make a point about it and show why it relates, I will have something to work with. As it stands, I see nothing to respond to. You are entitled to your opinion that you made a point. I just don't share that view.
I do not believe in messaging based on race. I believe we are in a class, not a race war. I believe that democratic focus on identity politics is part of why liberals lose elections. Messaging is everything. Sanders had the superior message in my opinion. I am deeply sympathetic to black suffering and understand why the issue of race seems more important to many than the fact that there are lots of not so very well off whites who are suffering too and that because of identity politics they feel they will be left behind. There is only one race, the human race. Class wars are won by dividing the majority class by race. That will happen. Liberals shouldn't feed that fire. Inclusion isn't words its action. Uniting people isn't talking about how bad division is. It's ending it.
How does that apply to what I said? Where in what I said is the implication that people voted for Trump because liberals are mean to them? And as far as evidence goes, what evidence could I have presented when I knew from day one that Trump would win his primary? Was there any evidence. I bet none you saw but there was a world of it to me.
Hardly odd. It explains everything. I just said that identity focus allows for dividing a majority class by race. Nobody will give a shit about race inequality if you fix class inequality without regard to race. This should be obvious. Are you pulling my leg?
Facebook
Twitter