Nitemare
Lifer
- Feb 8, 2001
- 35,461
- 4
- 81
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
We should matter, after all my vote is worth just as much as yours. In the grand scheme of things all of the hype over us isn't all that worthwhile. The other states vote just as they would have anyway, we just happen to be the first to begin pruning the crowd of candidates.
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
We should matter, after all my vote is worth just as much as yours. In the grand scheme of things all of the hype over us isn't all that worthwhile. The other states vote just as they would have anyway, we just happen to be the first to begin pruning the crowd of candidates.
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
We should matter, after all my vote is worth just as much as yours. In the grand scheme of things all of the hype over us isn't all that worthwhile. The other states vote just as they would have anyway, we just happen to be the first to begin pruning the crowd of candidates.
In this age of the interwebs, this whole Caucus BS seems very antiquated to me.
Why on earth do Iowa and New Hampshire have a key role in determining which candidates will be in the race in a month or two?
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
We should matter, after all my vote is worth just as much as yours. In the grand scheme of things all of the hype over us isn't all that worthwhile. The other states vote just as they would have anyway, we just happen to be the first to begin pruning the crowd of candidates.
In this age of the interwebs, this whole Caucus BS seems very antiquated to me.
Why on earth do Iowa and New Hampshire have a key role in determining which candidates will be in the race in a month or two?
I beleive Bill Clinton won his re-election without winning wither Iowa Or NH? Hell, people are saying McCain is making a resurgence and he didn't even campaign in Iowa.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
I beleive Bill Clinton won his re-election without winning wither Iowa Or NH? Hell, people are saying McCain is making a resurgence and he didn't even campaign in Iowa.Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: loki8481
the real question is, should Iowa matter?
regardless of the outcome, I'm hoping the answer is no and that we don't have a repeat of 2004, with a small percentage of a small, unrepresentative state acting as a kingmaker.
We should matter, after all my vote is worth just as much as yours. In the grand scheme of things all of the hype over us isn't all that worthwhile. The other states vote just as they would have anyway, we just happen to be the first to begin pruning the crowd of candidates.
In this age of the interwebs, this whole Caucus BS seems very antiquated to me.
Why on earth do Iowa and New Hampshire have a key role in determining which candidates will be in the race in a month or two?
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Yeah as others have said..i don't get the Iowa thing. I was watching Chris Matthews right now, and instead of talking about the issues or the candidates positions are, they are talking about if Obama loses, or if Mitt Loses, should they just give up or do they have a chance at all. Its one state...I don't give a shit what Iowa thinks. If the media didn't make it out to be such a big deal with the polls and everything, people would just vote on how they felt...like the way it should be...
I hate our political system sometimes...well...most of the times.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Yeah as others have said..i don't get the Iowa thing. I was watching Chris Matthews right now, and instead of talking about the issues or the candidates positions are, they are talking about if Obama loses, or if Mitt Loses, should they just give up or do they have a chance at all. Its one state...I don't give a shit what Iowa thinks. If the media didn't make it out to be such a big deal with the polls and everything, people would just vote on how they felt...like the way it should be...
I hate our political system sometimes...well...most of the times.
You know I loved Chris Matthews and many political programs.
I'm the type of geek that curls up with a bag of popcorn to watch the Mclaughlin group on pbs with my girlfriend every Friday night.
Ron Paul has ruined that for me.
It's sort of like war. People find it very interesting and entertaining...until they experience it.
Then they comprehend the truth of war.
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Yeah as others have said..i don't get the Iowa thing. I was watching Chris Matthews right now, and instead of talking about the issues or the candidates positions are, they are talking about if Obama loses, or if Mitt Loses, should they just give up or do they have a chance at all. Its one state...I don't give a shit what Iowa thinks. If the media didn't make it out to be such a big deal with the polls and everything, people would just vote on how they felt...like the way it should be...
I hate our political system sometimes...well...most of the times.
You know I loved Chris Matthews and many political programs.
I'm the type of geek that curls up with a bag of popcorn to watch the Mclaughlin group on pbs with my girlfriend every Friday night.
Ron Paul has ruined that for me.
It's sort of like war. People find it very interesting and entertaining...until they experience it.
Then they comprehend the truth of war.
What are you saying, that you use to be ok watching those kind of shows, but now you know they are full of it?
Originally posted by: rrahman1
^ check out this larry king cnn poll: Who would you vote for in the Iowa caucus?
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Originally posted by: rrahman1
^ check out this larry king cnn poll: Who would you vote for in the Iowa caucus?
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/
Who would you vote for in the Iowa caucus?
--- snipped ---
This is not a scientific poll
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Originally posted by: rrahman1
^ check out this larry king cnn poll: Who would you vote for in the Iowa caucus?
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/
Who would you vote for in the Iowa caucus?
--- snipped ---
This is not a scientific poll
Yeah, I don't even know why they bother with these silly "polls."
