Dude if your child starves to death you gonna go to jail.
Also Wales isn't an island
I'm pretty sure Wales is on the British Isles, am I wrong or are you stating that Great Britain isn't a bunch of islands?
Dude if your child starves to death you gonna go to jail.
Also Wales isn't an island
why should you make a separate meal for them? food is expensive and a bitch to make 2 meals.
they need to try EVERYTHING. because as you say their palet is not done. one day they may hate broccoli but the next week it may click and they will love it (wich btw happened to my son heh).
I'm pretty sure Wales is on the British Isles, am I wrong or are you stating that Great Britain isn't a bunch of islands?
I wouldn't. I'd cook a meal I think they would like, staying away from using things I know they dislike just like I do when I cook for friends and family. I love food and I love to cook food, I'd want my kids to feel the same way and I don't believe it helps forcing them to eat things they do not appreciate.
Try? Yes, of course I agree with that. Preferably several times too, in different ways if possible. But if you get to a point where it's clear the child doesn't like it, I don't see the point in forcing it.
I believe that if you include the kids in the process of making food, getting them exited about tastes and textures, they'll want to try more. Setting down a plate on the table and saying "Eat or go hungry" doesn't work for me.
I've cooked a lot of food with my younger cousins, who are ridiculously picky with food (spoiled brats) and they are much more open-minded to different ingredients when they participate in the cooking process.
Nope, no kids. If/When I have them, they'll be on the 'eat it or wear it' plan, just like I was.
oh i do have the kids help make it. They need to learn to cook. They are involved in the decisions nearly every night.
we try to avoid things i know they hate. but when 3 people in the family love taco's and one hates it guess what? im not going to make the other 3 go without. my daughter will eat at least 1. she won't be going hungry.
Same thing we will make stuff my son hates and i hate (pasta. i can't stand pasta). again i eat it and they know i dislike it. again why should i make 2 meals? I have to be able to fallow the rules too or they won't.
there are times when its something i know they love and just don't want it. No way in hell will i make a 2nd meal and yes they can go hungry that night if they refuse to eat it. they aren't going to die over missing a evening meal. but again most times they eat some at least.
I really don't think we have anything to argue over here. I wouldn't cook additional meals either.
Though I really don't have a problem cooking rice along with the pasta as an alternative
Don't worry First, when I want them to learn how to pick up things off the ground, around the 1 year old mentality level, I'll send them to your training shop. Why waste my time when I can throw you a bone or two right?
But yeah, you're a horrible parent, the parents job to let them grow to become the person they will become.
You don't have the first clue what it means to be a good parent.
Not to be a fucking dictator who forces meals down their throat.
I'll say that three years ago I would have said "wow, those parents fail". And I still do, to a degree. But speaking from personal experience I can't always fault parents when it comes to raising kids and I have no respect for anyone without kids who takes the "eat it or starve" stance.
As a relatively new parent it was very difficult for me to realize that my boy was underweight. At the age of one he was so skinny that he weighed less than 98% of all 1yo American boys. At 18 months he weighed less than 99.5% of boys. It got so bad that the pediatrician jokingly said "You need to slather every bite he eats in butter"; she must have gone to the Paula Deen medical school. We've been mixing Carnation Breakfast powder into all his milk. We feed him healthy food but we have to make sure that he gets as many calories as he can, and it's not always easy.
If I and my wife were so self-absorbed, stupid, and irresponsible enough to think that "eat it or starve" was an acceptable parenting technique our son would be dead. Luckily for him we're a bit more mature than that and at the age of two he's up to the 9th percentile for weight. Every little bit helps...
People in poor health tend not to be fat.
I am having to explain this to someone who has passed middle school? COME ON!
That is all well known, unless you work for a MSM-aligned disease-related organization. They all seem to be oblivious to anything their sponsors haven't paid for. Long-term, eating only or mostly fast food is bad for you. Short-term, it would all be about your menu selections.ps, to the people saying she looks good for eating only chicken nuggets. i disagree. her skin looks terrible.
edit- wolf and if you watch BigHead you'll see a guy who eats nothing but FF but loses weight and gets healthier ZOMG! I lost 60 pounds last year and I increased my fat intake and I never cut fast food from my diet, ZOMG!
I don't know what chicken nuggets do to a woman's vagina, but based on the photo, I'd hit that.
They had a guy on there who has eaten virtually only meat for years, for example.
smartest thing you said ..
but the fact you seem ignorant of is that it is also the parents job to make them do things that they don't want to do that is good for them. Such as getting there shots, going to school, etc.
NOT having them eat a healthy meal is hurting them. NOT exposing them to every kind of food is hurting them (btw you do know that kids will hate one thing then sometimes love it a week latter. wich is why they should try everything over and over).
the ultimate goal of a parent is having a healthy child. both in body and mind. So i do things they don't like (and i don't either) for them to be heatlhy not as punishment. part of that is being a better person, better parent and better off then there parents.
making them eat veggies? keeping junk food away? keeping fit with exercise? yeah things they need. My son would prefer to stay in and play video games or his lego's and eat junk food. so am i being a bad parent like you claim by not allowing that? fuck no only a idiot thinks that.
IF i knew they would be healthy with such a lifestyle i would allow it. fact is they won't.
the mother in the article? a fucking failure.
Don't know about the U.K. but if she was here would have to wait a few months before can hit but then would again & again.
Hot
What's wrong with that?
The meat we eat comes from animals that eat plants, so in essence we are eating plants right?
The reason we got these big brains was because of fruits and berries, not because of white bread, white rice or overcooked potatoes.
I actually saw a show on this on the Discovery Health Channel (I think it was that channel). They attributed the enlarged brain size to cooking our meat. Cooked meat is far easier to digest. Digestion requires a lot of energy. Brains require a lot of energy. Reducing the energy needed for digestion allowed that free energy to be used by larger brains.
That is the ultra simplistic explaination of it.
They also explained why we sweat. Creatures who sweat are distance runners while those who do not cannot run for long periods of time...they overhead. We simply would run our prey to death. They supported it with the large butt muscles humans have and many other things.
Very neat show.
Then you misunderstood it or it was a travesty of a program.
Our brains don't require proteins, they are made up of fatty tissue and use carbohydrates for energy, this isn't up for discussion, it's been known for 100 years. I'll go with fruits and berries for 1 trillion dollars Alec.
The rest is so ... stupid... we're not great runners, humans never hunted based on outrunning others and ALL animals have a way to release excessive heat.
The fastest sprinter and the most durable runners on earth, Cheetas and Elephants, don't sweat at all.