So who's at fault here? *UPDATED*

[KK]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: KK

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: KK
quasarsky should have not been so jumpy with regards to leaving feedback at all. tfinch2 has a right to leave a neutral feedback, negative is too much. If quasarsky left a negative then tfinch2 would be able to leave a negative.

Oh yeah, another thing that bothers me is people saying not to post PMs. PMs are owned by the reciever. If you don't want them out in the open, don't send them at all.

pm's aren't OWNED by anyone.

but there is a difference between posting something in a PM and something publically.

if all Q did was threaten T in a PM to leave him neutral heat and didn't follow thru but then T posted that PM instead of this thread, do you think T would have any support? NO.

so we can clearly see in the minds of almost everyone here on AT that there is a substantive difference between posting a PM and posting a thread or heat.

what do you mean they are not owned by anyone. So my pm's show up under your pm's? Nah I didn't think so. I own them, I got permission to delete my recieved PMs. If I wanna post them, I've got the right. That's all I'm saying.

I didn't quite follow you T and Q question. Who didn't follow thru? Q with his threat or T with his lack of making it right?

His lack of making it right? He only had 45 minutes to respond, and then a neutral was posted.

Yeah, I know he had only 45 minutes IRL. But i didn't understand exactly what PG was meaning. He was giving a scenerio and I don't have all the parameters or don't understand it.

 

[Schfifty Five]

Originally posted by: TerumoII

Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
1. Please stop saying we are in a clan. That is just stupid.

Want to be called a pack of rabid dogs instead??

2. Please stop masking your posts w/ emoticons. You're not fooling anyone thinking your posts are friendly just b/c there's a little smiley.

Oh, now we have another mindreader in our midst!!

So tell me what tin foil hat is making you read my mind?

3. Please stop ignoring the question I have asked you at least two times now. I will ask the question here once more.

I'll post what I will and when I will and how I will is not up to your requests.

/grabbing a box of Milkbones....here poochie poochies....



Terumo

Thanks. You just removed any doubt anyone had regarding if you were a tool. We now know you are.

You can't even answer a simple question. Yup, it's official that you are either Quarsky's alt, or his gf or bf or somebody that is related to him thus you defend him at all costs. Your defense isn't even logical at times and you come off as an arrogant prick.

You're no longer a neutral party after reading all your ridiculous comments/posts.

 

[diapickle]

Originally posted by: Schfifty Five

Originally posted by: TerumoII

Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
1. Please stop saying we are in a clan. That is just stupid.

Want to be called a pack of rabid dogs instead??

2. Please stop masking your posts w/ emoticons. You're not fooling anyone thinking your posts are friendly just b/c there's a little smiley.

Oh, now we have another mindreader in our midst!!

So tell me what tin foil hat is making you read my mind?

3. Please stop ignoring the question I have asked you at least two times now. I will ask the question here once more.

I'll post what I will and when I will and how I will is not up to your requests.

/grabbing a box of Milkbones....here poochie poochies....



Terumo

Thanks. You just removed any doubt anyone had regarding if you were a tool. We now know you are.

You can't even answer a simple question. Yup, it's official that you are either Quarsky's alt, or his gf or bf or somebody that is related to him thus you defend him at all costs

or his dog, for that matter

 

[PlatinumGold]

Originally posted by: KK

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: KK
quasarsky should have not been so jumpy with regards to leaving feedback at all. tfinch2 has a right to leave a neutral feedback, negative is too much. If quasarsky left a negative then tfinch2 would be able to leave a negative.

Oh yeah, another thing that bothers me is people saying not to post PMs. PMs are owned by the reciever. If you don't want them out in the open, don't send them at all.

pm's aren't OWNED by anyone.

but there is a difference between posting something in a PM and something publically.

if all Q did was threaten T in a PM to leave him neutral heat and didn't follow thru but then T posted that PM instead of this thread, do you think T would have any support? NO.

so we can clearly see in the minds of almost everyone here on AT that there is a substantive difference between posting a PM and posting a thread or heat.

what do you mean they are not owned by anyone. So my pm's show up under your pm's? Nah I didn't think so. I own them, I got permission to delete my recieved PMs. If I wanna post them, I've got the right. That's all I'm saying.

I didn't quite follow you T and Q question. Who didn't follow thru? Q with his threat or T with his lack of making it right?

technically, anything posted via PM or public thread on AT belongs to Anand and the Anandtech corporation.

but a distinction is made by AT Forum rules and mods between Public Posts and PM's.

if i accuse someone of something publically i am held accountable to them and the public to either prove it or admit i'm wrong.

if i accuse someone of something via PM and then THEY post it publically i am under any obligation to either prove it or apologize for it.

there is a distinction.

 

[Rufio]

May be terumo's a prison inmate
AHAHAA

 

[OfficeLinebacker]

Originally posted by: PlatinumGoldYOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK.

Did you think of that all by yourself? That's clever. Got any Titanic jokes so we can take advantage of that phenonmenon at the height of it's popularity as well?

 

[OfficeLinebacker]

Oops, forgot to log in as diapickle/Odin/BigJ (we are all the same person BTW, we trade with each other all the time and accumulate vast amounts of heat. I am thinking of starting another login as well, any suggestions?)

 

[KK]

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
but a distinction is made by AT Forum rules and mods between Public Posts and PM's.

There's a rule against it? I was not aware there was.

 

[CHOPPER GOD]

?

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: OfficeLinebacker
Oops, forgot to log in as diapickle/Odin/BigJ (we are all the same person BTW, we trade with each other all the time and accumulate vast amounts of heat. I am thinking of starting another login as well, any suggestions?)

Shhhhhh!!!

 

[Terumo]

Thanks mod for fixing the NOSPAM issue with this account -- now back with my original account.

EDIT: For all those who sent PMs to my old [this] account, resend them to this one, since TerumoII is being closed. Thanks!

Terumo

 

[The Batt?sai]

YAYY i got my new scanner from canon.

works like a charm :-D

comparing it to the old one tfinch2 sent me i think i see why it doesn't work. i'll take a photo and post once my camera batteries charge. i looked and tried like 10 diff. aa batteries and all are dead lol sheesh. i need to go buy some rechargeables from walmart :-D

the things or cables taht attach the bar that moves the scanning head back and forth are extremely loose in the one tfinch2 sent me. the ones in teh new one are perfectly taut. i'll send the pic in about 4 hours when my batteries are done

 

[Terumo]

Originally posted by: Baked
This would never have happened if people use IM.

It'll happen anywhere at anytime. Someone will always try to fight the battle publicly to garner support (which I think this is the case here and how it's being played out).

Terumo

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: quasarsky
YAYY i got my new scanner from canon.

works like a charm :-D

comparing it to the old one tfinch2 sent me i think i see why it doesn't work. i'll take a photo and post once my camera batteries charge. i looked and tried like 10 diff. aa batteries and all are dead lol sheesh. i need to go buy some rechargeables from walmart :-D

the things or cables taht attach the bar that moves the scanning head back and forth are extremely loose in the one tfinch2 sent me. the ones in teh new one are perfectly taut. i'll send the pic in about 4 hours when my batteries are done

You suck at diagnosing scanner problems.

If it's what I'm thinking - it's a very easy fix.

 

[Rufio]

Originally posted by: quasarsky
YAYY i got my new scanner from canon.

works like a charm :-D

comparing it to the old one tfinch2 sent me i think i see why it doesn't work. i'll take a photo and post once my camera batteries charge. i looked and tried like 10 diff. aa batteries and all are dead lol sheesh. i need to go buy some rechargeables from walmart :-D

the things or cables taht attach the bar that moves the scanning head back and forth are extremely loose in the one tfinch2 sent me. the ones in teh new one are perfectly taut. i'll send the pic in about 4 hours when my batteries are done

in 4 hours!?? that's 3 hours 15 minutes too long!

 

[The Batt?sai]

and that would be? i talked to canon on the phone. they had me try everything in their diagnostic trouble shooting steps.

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: Terumo

Originally posted by: Baked
This would never have happened if people use IM.

It'll happen anywhere at anytime. Someone will always try to fight the battle publicly to garner support (which I think this is the case here and how it's being played out).

Terumo

Terumo, you still haven't addressed the question I asked you.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: quasarsky
and that would be? i talked to canon on the phone. they had me try everything in their diagnostic trouble shooting steps.

You probably didn't actually open it and fix it though. Which for someone who has built so many computers I would think that would be trivial.

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: Terumo

Originally posted by: Baked
This would never have happened if people use IM.

It'll happen anywhere at anytime. Someone will always try to fight the battle publicly to garner support (which I think this is the case here and how it's being played out).

Terumo

Terumo, you still haven't addressed the question I asked you.

Don't even bother with Terumo anymore. She's a very obvious troll. It's that simple.

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: quasarsky
and that would be? i talked to canon on the phone. they had me try everything in their diagnostic trouble shooting steps.

That's because they knew you were too dense to follow directions.

 

[The Batt?sai]

yea i open alot of stuff. i even opend my megaworks sub box. i didnt' feel like open the scanner up. to me that feels like the equivalent of opening up my digital camera.

plus if it didnt' fix it canon would know and not take it back! :-O

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: quasarsky
and that would be? i talked to canon on the phone. they had me try everything in their diagnostic trouble shooting steps.

That's because they knew you were too dense to follow directions.

Uncalled for...

Viper GTS

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: quasarsky
and that would be? i talked to canon on the phone. they had me try everything in their diagnostic trouble shooting steps.

That's because they knew you were too dense to follow directions.

Uncalled for...

Viper GTS

Agreed.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: quasarsky
yea i open alot of stuff. i even opend my megaworks sub box. i didnt' feel like open the scanner up. to me that feels like the equivalent of opening up my digital camera.

plus if it didnt' fix it canon would know and not take it back! :-O

Did it have a warranty seal? Most scanners do not.

 

[mosco]

This thread is crazy. It was a neutral rating! If someone sent me something that didn't work I would be pissed to. I don't care what the person does to fix it, it still isn't a positive experience. People shouldn't get upset over a neutral rating.