K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 52,129
- 45,168
- 136
Putin use of nazis means anti Russian.
Means anybody who won't simply roll over for him.
Putin use of nazis means anti Russian.
You underestimate meYou'd think after making a complete fucking fool of yourself earlier in this thread you'd learn not to be such arrogant asshole about everything.
I figured this was going to be a given after so many reports of abandoned BUK systems out in the field being captured by UKR defense and Azov forces.
It stems from Ukranians who joined sides with the nazis in WWII to break free from Sovjet Russia.Means anybody who won't simply roll over for him.
Ukraine continues to recover/capture/destroy Russian armor.
Best. Movie. Ever.
Not easily "moved". Plenty of military and private/public assets for imaging going on (21st century). Polar orbits and earth rotation facilitate this. Spend ten minutes star gazing.So are we to believe that no certain satellites are being moved towards Ukraine to gather intelligence?
Besides fully back the lies that got us into Iraq you mean?What'd NYT do to you?
Thousands are currently dying everyday solely because of one man's ego. I see nothing wrong with hoping for a revolution, which would almost certainly include his killing.
With the way the ruble is, not sure they could scrape enough togetherI don't disagree. It's one thing wishing for a country to rise up and overtake a tyrant. It's another to pile into what amounts to a public bounty on a world leader. Just flip that around and say Russia did the same thing *publicly* against Biden. The original comment was suggesting a go fund me for an assassination bounty.
Legally I'm not sure you want your name on such a list. Ethically think about how ugly that can get.
The problem with a NFZ is that you're effectively declaring war the moment you go to enforce it. We'd have to knock out Russian anti-aircraft stuff on the ground to operate in the area safely and also shoot down any Russian planes/helicopters flying into a NFZ.Plea to impose no fly zone:
Have seen arguments that closing the sky would have limited impact - majority of barrages into the cities are from artillery and from missile launchers positioned back in Belarus and Russia.
Come on, we've all seen the movies. A couple button presses and a geostationary satellite slides right into place.Not easily "moved". Plenty of military and private/public assets for imaging going on (21st century). Polar orbits and earth rotation facilitate this. Spend ten minutes star gazing.
I may be wrong, but I suspect the only geostationary spy satellites are for listening to RF information. And of course military command communications (relay of drone images, control, ect.)Come on, we've all seen the movies. A couple button presses and a geostationary satellite slides right into place.
Unfortunately, I think Putin is willing to sacrifice a lot of innocent Russians, and because how the culture/history/media censorship of Russia is, the population is not going to uprise. I think they will take the suffering of the sanctions and the lives lost in the war as part of "being Russian", like it is a natural law or simply the destiny of the Russian people, always to suffer.
A no fly zone could have Russia resorting to even more long-range artillery and missile attacks. And given they've already been hitting civilian targets from up close, I don't think we want to give them excuses for example, "our rusted **** isn't as accurate as we thought it was". As long as Ukraine has AA capabilities and keeps getting Stingers, I'd leave it alone.
I wouldn't go that far myself, but entertaining. The great Bill Paxton was in it too, sigh.