Originally posted by: pontifex
there are too many people who concede that cops = evil. its obvious there are bad cops out there, but they aren't all bad.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
most people who hate cops hate them for doing their job correctly and well.Originally posted by: rh71
"No wonder everyone hates cops"...
Oh really?
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: moshquerade
most people who hate cops hate them for doing their job correctly and well.Originally posted by: rh71
"No wonder everyone hates cops"...
Oh really?
Wrong.
Originally posted by: pontifex
Anyone who hates ALL cops is a dumbass.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Actually, I think you have to prove your stance first.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: moshquerade
most people who hate cops hate them for doing their job correctly and well.Originally posted by: rh71
"No wonder everyone hates cops"...
Oh really?
Wrong.
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: moshquerade
most people who hate cops hate them for doing their job correctly and well.Originally posted by: rh71
"No wonder everyone hates cops"...
Oh really?
Wrong.
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
So let me get this straight...
1. Make shit up
2. Someone points out that you're making shit up
3. They have to prove that you're making shit up
If you had any basis for saying what you said, you'd have posted it. Proving you wrong would be a waste of his time.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
the experience as a kid with cops was horrible because..... you got caught for doing something wrong? or were the cops doing something wrong to you in those cases?
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Actually, I think you have to prove your stance first.
the challenger does. i can then refute.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
the challenger does. i can then refute.
link to rules.Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Actually, I think you have to prove your stance first.
the challenger does. i can then refute.
err no.
you made a statement. he called you on it. it is up to you to prove what you said. it is not up to him to prove you wrong.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you have now elected to carry the burden of proof.
Actually, I think you have to prove your stance first.
the challenger does. i can then refute.
err no.
you made a statement. he called you on it. it is up to you to prove what you said. it is not up to him to prove you wrong.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: moshquerade
bite me. :roll:
Oh you got me there.![]()