NON_POLITICAL China Coronavirus THREAD

Page 324 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Dec 10, 2005
29,629
15,193
136
It's great for men that don't die.



Pitches like that lead to pork when you're talking about government spending. Lobster treadmills could lead to the next great breakthrough! Look at how they discovered Viagra! Etc. I've seen it before on infotainment news shows. Some lobbyist on Fox News defending a pet project.
The myth of the "wasteful" shrimp treadmill... That thing never dies. People take one small thing of a much larger project and blow everything way out of proportion. Bacterial immune systems doesn't necessarily sound very interesting either.

Grant money isn't just handed out willy-nilly. Proposals are actually peer reviewed
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,782
48,476
136
If that's really the case, you would move to testing over PPE and shields, I would think? Some cultures won't put up with the masks as we have learned.

Quashed doesn’t mean eradicated. The latter is only certain with a vaccine in everybody. Many precautions are still necessary to prevent a resurgence.

Yes, some cultures won’t put up with masks. These are stupid peoples.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
I honestly don't know what you're complaining about.

I was merely pointing out to the basic research haters who think studying X is useless as those studies from many years prior may actually have substantial value later on.
I have never seen anyone who thought CRISPR or studying bacteria is worthless.

"Research haters?" Well, if they exist and you "merely" wanted to call them out by stating something embarrassingly obvious, well, I'm not obligated to keep my mouth shut. It was amusing. My response to the same post you were responding to:
I figure anyone who knows what CRISPR is knows this, [that it came from bacteria,] since it comes along with the explanation of what it does and how it's important.
Yes, I love ironically making worthless posts to call out worthless posts *coolshades* You never know what may come out from discoveries! ;)

Anyway, I wouldn't call the discovery of CRISPR "basic" research either. Everyone who doesn't know what it is should see this video:

It really is amazing.

The myth of the "wasteful" shrimp treadmill... That thing never dies. People take one small thing of a much larger project and blow everything way out of proportion. Bacterial immune systems doesn't necessarily sound very interesting either.

Grant money isn't just handed out willy-nilly. Proposals are actually peer reviewed
Joking, right? "Interesting" would be an understatement. It's pretty much a Holy Grail. The potential here is mind-blowing ...and yet here we are acting like the amazing part is merely that it was found in a bacteria.

DOES. NOT. COMPUTE.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
23,223
13,302
136
Grant money isn't just handed out willy-nilly. Proposals are actually peer reviewed

Really? Okay, glad to know where you stand on that subject.

Yes, some cultures won’t put up with masks. These are stupid peoples.

If they are in a voting majority and if their representative officials in government respect their wishes, they get what they want. If we tried to reopen schools around here with those precautionary measures, we would see two responses in the majoirty:

1). "If they need masks and shields, it isn't safe yet"
2). "My kids aren't wearing a mask just because you said so"

Possibly both.

I'd be more along the lines of 1). Though with the quality of masks some people are getting around here, I have to ask, why bother?

 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
It really is just childish dumb shit.

There aren't general laws you can slap on everyday things in life.



But it's overall actually quite simple:

Avoid touching shit you don't have to.... Such as other people's hands...

Keep a general safe distance others. If you don't have to be close then don't.

Wash hands / use hand sanitizer often

Refrain from touching your face. If you must, thoroughly wash hands first.





But for some reason people have to be full blown retard.
A friend needed an "emergency" ride home last night from the restaurant where he works. I arrived at the restaurant to see him and 4 or 5 co-workers not distancing themselves at all. Stupid stupid stupid.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_vaccine

U.S. vaccine effectiveness by start year:[25][26][27]
200410%
200521%
200652%
200737%
200841%
200956%
201060%
201147%
201249%
201352%
201419%
201548%
201640%
201738%
201829%
201945% es

I wonder what the effectiveness of the first ever corona virus vaccine will be.
Flu vaccines are for multiple strains, specifically ignoring some strains that aren't expected to be prevalent in the next 6 months or so.

A SARS-COV-2 vaccine would likely be effective for all known strains, because the virus hasn't been in people long enough to diversify the way flu has.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
I think that I already had it back in early February, and the experience really wasn't much worse than the flu. Lots of coughing and difficulty breathing, but it never felt like it was going to kill me.

What's funny is that I was going to do a "Coolcoin Cares" program where the first confirmed case of 'Rona on ATOT from a Diamond Member or Lifer was going to get a t-shirt, but if I'm right I'd have to award myself the t-shirt. Awkward.
I'm not concerned for myself. I'm concerned for the people downstream who would be infected, including elderly and people with health complications.

As I have mentioned, I might have had it in March. My throat felt strange for a week. Not even sore, but definitely something. The idea that I caught something LESS virulent / LESS contagious than SARS-COV-2 while being as careful as possible just seems highly unlikely. My twin brother (who has also been my roommate as he avoids a health-compromised family member) also got sick soon after me. He actually had some minor symptoms. Also 100% gone after a week.
 
Last edited:

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Quashed doesn’t mean eradicated. The latter is only certain with a vaccine in everybody. Many precautions are still necessary to prevent a resurgence.

Yes, some cultures won’t put up with masks. These are stupid peoples.

You know that some people just can't wear a mask because they can't breathe right while wearing one, right?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,782
48,476
136
If they are in a voting majority and if their representative officials in government respect their wishes, they get what they want. If we tried to reopen schools around here with those precautionary measures, we would see two responses in the majoirty:

1). "If they need masks and shields, it isn't safe yet"
2). "My kids aren't wearing a mask just because you said so"

Possibly both.

I'd be more along the lines of 1). Though with the quality of masks some people are getting around here, I have to ask, why bother?


Give parents a couple more months at home with their kids and they'll probably agree to about any measures to get them back in school.

Perhaps the most important part of combating any outbreak is public health communication. There is little possible argument that the government has failed spectacularly at this task. There are of course selfish political motivations for some of this that go beyond the stated limits of this thread.

I've bought maybe 10 different kinds of cloth masks with wildly differing fits and quality. The government should have gotten together with some designers and put together the best options with different sizes for mass production. Also cheaping out is bad:

But unlike the original Wake Forest-designed Nightingale, which retails online for $180 for a pack of 24 ($7.50 each), Tennessee's masks cost the state $1.65 each, according to spokesman Dean Flener. That's because while the design is the same, the material is different. These are made with terry polyester and treated with Silvadur, a non-toxic silver antimicrobial good for 25 industrial washes.

Renfro Corp. said the difference in material was in order to meet the needs and budget of the state.
 
Last edited:

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
From what i heard, COVID-19 antibody tests are much more available than COVID-19 infection tests so you should have no problems having it done.
Where did you hear this? SARS-COV-2 antibody tests are still very new. Also there were a lot of fake tests sold online.
 
Last edited:

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,782
48,476
136
Where did you hear this? Antibody tests are still very new. Also there were a lot of fake tests sold online.

You can easily get them through Quest who's running the Abbott Labs test (100% sensitive, 99.6% specific FDA verified). Don't trust the cheap Chinese lateral flow quick tests floating around out there.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
You can easily get them through Quest who's running the Abbott Labs test (100% sensitive, 99.6% specific FDA verified). Don't trust the cheap Chinese lateral flow quick tests floating around out there.
Any idea how much the antibody test costs if it's not covered by insurance?

I might want to get tested myself and pay for a few others to be tested.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,782
48,476
136
Any idea how much the antibody test costs if it's not covered by insurance?

I might want to get tested myself and pay for a few others to be tested.

Per Quest $119 plus a blood draw fee. Mine was no cost since I got my doc to order it.
 

gill77

Senior member
Aug 3, 2006
813
250
136
Flu vaccines are for multiple strains, specifically ignoring some strains that aren't expected to be prevalent in the next 6 months or so.

A SARS-COV-2 vaccine would likely be effective for all known strains, because the virus hasn't been in people long enough to diversify the way flu has.

Just curious. Given that this would be the first human coronavirus and that it has already mutated, what would you expect the effectiveness to be?
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Just curious. Given that this would be the first human coronavirus and that it has already mutated, what would you expect the effectiveness to be?
I expect near 100%, but I'm no expert. This is not the first human coronavirus. The previous SARS coronavirus never got a vaccine, but was stopped by isolation. I suppose it was nowhere near as virulent / contagious since it was possible to stop with just quarantines and contact tracing. Apparently it had a far greater death rate though, so it was easier to convince people to take appropriate actions in affected circles before it got way out of hand.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Just curious. Given that this would be the first human coronavirus and that it has already mutated, what would you expect the effectiveness to be?
What? "First human Coronavirus?"

Various coronaviruses are endemic in humans. Coronavirus is responsible for about a third of all common colds. There are human coronaviruses and there are animal coronaviruses and sometimes a new strain for which we have no immunity makes the jump, just like pandemic influenzas.

MERS was a coronavirus. SARS was a coronavirus. The vaccine for COVID-19 (disease) would only apply to the new/novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.
 
Last edited:

gill77

Senior member
Aug 3, 2006
813
250
136
Sorry about that. Fixed it. Coronavirus vaccine. Currently none for SARS, MERS, covid-19 or the common cold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CZroe

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Sorry about that. Fixed it. Coronavirus vaccine. Currently none for SARS, MERS, covid-19 or the common cold.
Yeah. That's had me puzzled. It seems that we've been operating on the assumption that we can just make a vaccine like we do for flu. The explanation we keep hearing for the lack of a SARS vaccine was that research dollars dried up after people stopped dying so several promising vaccine research projects were shelved, but that doesn't explain why we don't have one for MERS 8 years after it broke out.

Earlier in the thread I questioned why there wasn't one for MERS if we take it for granted that we can make one for this. I mean, MERS is already endemic and very deadly.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Sorry about that. Fixed it. Coronavirus vaccine. Currently none for SARS, MERS, covid-19 or the common cold.
Certainly a possibility we won't get an effective vaccine for this, but if one is developed I expect one extreme or the other (near-100% effective or near-0%).

I hear of promising vaccines being tested but I've also heard contradictory reports about various drugs for treating the infected. Most of us can only watch and wait.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,782
48,476
136
Looks like NIH is prepping for the possibility of human challenge trials for vaccine candidates.

The US government’s medical research arm is preparing the ground for Covid-19 “human challenge trials” that would deliberately infect healthy volunteers with coronavirus, as part of efforts to accelerate work on the development of a vaccine.

Francis Collins, director of National Institutes of Health, has asked the NIH vaccines working group to “write a perspective on the scientific and practical considerations for a Covid-19 human challenge model”. The group, which includes senior vaccine developers from universities and industry, will meet on May 11 to discuss the issue.

https://www.ft.com/content/0e7f1aff-9323-4d82-93ff-bbc5c20514d0

There is a lot that has to be organized and it would take a few months but that would dovetail with the completion of Phase 2 safety and efficacy data from some vaccine candidates and the likely more effective therapeutics that will become available (antibody therapy).
 

gill77

Senior member
Aug 3, 2006
813
250
136
Yeah. That's had me puzzled. It seems that we've been operating on the assumption that we can just make a vaccine like we do for flu. The explanation we keep hearing for the lack of a SARS vaccine was that research dollars dried up after people stopped dying so several promising vaccine research projects were shelved, but that doesn't explain why we don't have one for MERS 8 years after it broke out.

Earlier in the thread I questioned why there wasn't one for MERS if we take it for granted that we can make one for this. I mean, MERS is already endemic and very deadly.

I heard they thought they had one for SARS, but test subjects started having heart attacks.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
52,336
7,606
136
80,000 dead in America

Has there been any explanation as to why America has more than 2x as many deaths than other countries?