Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads

Page 555 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
851
801
106
Wildcat Lake (WCL) Preliminary Specs

Intel Wildcat Lake (WCL) is upcoming mobile SoC replacing ADL-N. WCL consists of 2 tiles: compute tile and PCD tile. It is true single die consists of CPU, GPU and NPU that is fabbed by 18-A process. Last time I checked, PCD tile is fabbed by TSMC N6 process. They are connected through UCIe, not D2D; a first from Intel. Expecting launching in Q2/Computex 2026. In case people don't remember AlderLake-N, I have created a table below to compare the detail specs of ADL-N and WCL. Just for fun, I am throwing LNL and upcoming Mediatek D9500 SoC.

Intel Alder Lake - NIntel Wildcat LakeIntel Lunar LakeMediatek D9500
Launch DateQ1-2023Q2-2026 ?Q3-2024Q3-2025
ModelIntel N300?Core Ultra 7 268VDimensity 9500 5G
Dies2221
NodeIntel 7 + ?Intel 18-A + TSMC N6TSMC N3B + N6TSMC N3P
CPU8 E-cores2 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-coresC1 1+3+4
Threads8688
Max Clock3.8 GHz?5 GHz
L3 Cache6 MB?12 MB
TDP7 WFanless ?17 WFanless
Memory64-bit LPDDR5-480064-bit LPDDR5-6800 ?128-bit LPDDR5X-853364-bit LPDDR5X-10667
Size16 GB?32 GB24 GB ?
Bandwidth~ 55 GB/s136 GB/s85.6 GB/s
GPUUHD GraphicsArc 140VG1 Ultra
EU / Xe32 EU2 Xe8 Xe12
Max Clock1.25 GHz2 GHz
NPUNA18 TOPS48 TOPS100 TOPS ?






PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,028
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,522
  • INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    181.4 KB · Views: 72,430
  • Clockspeed.png
    Clockspeed.png
    611.8 KB · Views: 72,318
Last edited:

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
4,563
4,187
106
In desktop and mobile laptop space, I think Intel Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake will beat Zen 5. I think Arrow Lake slaughters vanilla Zen 4 and 5 in gaming and trades blows with 7800X3D/9800X3D in lightly threaded games and pulls ahead of the 8 core X3D counterparts in heavily threaded games. And I think Arrow Lake beats 12 and 16 core Zen 4 and 5 X3D parts in heavily threaded games mostly.
I can't say about gaming due to ths tiles will add additional latency to IMC <-> CPU but iy should be on par with 7800X3D will definitely loose to 9800X3D
In the server and enterprise space, I think Zen 5 overall wins over Intel Xeon counterparts.
At least Intel will not bleed money like they used to on server for past few years these are actually good in god knows when wendell called it nehlam amd said they should have done it years ago at least Pat's Plan is working somewhat better than last 3 CEOs gotta give him credit
 

cannedlake240

Senior member
Jul 4, 2024
247
138
76
Intel will not bleed money like they used to on server for past few years
If Turin is 30% faster(clocks+IPC) vs intel instead of 50% faster as in the past, will that really change things for Intel? GNR does have a few advantages but AMD also has Vcache that's very useful for many workloads. Also GNR cost vs EMR is important, GNR uses a lot of euv silicon but emr's 2 750mm2 on Intel 7 tiles are also quite expensive...
 

9949asd

Member
Jul 12, 2024
139
96
61
I can't say about gaming due to ths tiles will add additional latency to IMC <-> CPU but iy should be on par with 7800X3D will definitely loose to 9800X3D

At least Intel will not bleed money like they used to on server for past few years these are actually good in god knows when wendell called it nehlam amd said they should have done it years ago at least Pat's Plan is working somewhat better than last 3 CEOs gotta give him credit
What if 9800x3d only 3% faster than 78x3d. 97x is 3% faster than 77x.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolverine2349

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
4,563
4,187
106
If Turin is 30% faster(clocks+IPC) vs intel instead of 50% faster as in the past, will that really change things for Intel? GNR does have a few advantages but AMD also has Vcache that's very useful for many workloads. Also GNR cost vs EMR is important, GNR uses a lot of euv silicon but emr's 2 750mm2 on Intel 7 tiles are also quite expensive...
It won't be 30% tbf on average it will be lot close than that there is also "AI" which AMD will undoubtedly loose to no matter how much they say AMD will trounce intel in NAMD for sure though we will see on 11 October though
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,015
4,628
126
I wonder why Intel won't do 3D vcache they have the tech now with Intel 3T and they are using it in Clearwater Forest
I've been wondering that for years. Intel announced it at CES 2019 (with hints about it throughout 2018), years before AMD had 3D cache. But, Intel never released it. 1728321464595.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schmide and Elfear

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,140
3,728
136
I'm showing static clocks @ 5400mhz (at 250w)

What you see in reviews are autoboosting at 200w (stock PPT limit for the 9950X) --> real clockspeed @ stock is only ~4800mhz in Cinebench R23
And like i have been saying from the start, vanilla Z5 stock V/F curve is pretty bad as it leaves alot on the table

Even leaks are showing the 9950X3D getting higher MT score with same PPT limit as 9950X ((even to a larger degreee then what we saw with Zen4)and now the X3D models scale all the way up the power curve)
Wow. I had no idea Zen 5 was clocked so conservatively out of the box.
 

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,140
3,728
136
I think some of my Zen data might not be accurate. If anybody has Zen<5 and want to test please post scores and average clock during the run. I can't let go of these pet projects until they are finished.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,885
4,873
136
Zen 4 does 482 pts/GHz/core with SMT, in ST that s 371 pts/GHz

The 7700X run at 5.3 in MT and does 20437 pts in Computerbase review, they measured almost 5.3 in Blender, your scores would imply that it run at roughly 5.65 all cores and that the SMT gain is only 23%, and also that Zen 5 best it by 21.9% better IPC in MT.

About all those CPUs ST and MT scores, excluding Zen5, can be found here, the frequencies measurements are scattered in the respective CPUs reviews.

 
Last edited:

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,465
4,999
136
wow if true

6200/5700 -> ~9% clockspeed regression
+9% IPC for "Gen15" vs Gen14

End results is that ST performance dont really change that much (?)
Will also be interesting to see how this uncore perform in gaming, so far we have seen not too good latency for Arrow Lake
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,359
17,437
136
Will also be interesting to see how this uncore perform in gaming, so far we have seen not too good latency for Arrow Lake
The uncore is probably the culprit for the lower IPC uplift (desktop relative to mobile).
 

jdubs03

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2013
1,282
902
136
Wait there’s more… courtesy of wxnod on Twitter.
Showing a 3% lower result in GB6.3 ST vs. the 9950X.
Looking pretty meh.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4549.jpeg
    IMG_4549.jpeg
    118.8 KB · Views: 49
  • IMG_4550.jpeg
    IMG_4550.jpeg
    198.4 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_4551.jpeg
    IMG_4551.jpeg
    130.1 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG_4552.jpeg
    IMG_4552.jpeg
    147.7 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_4548.jpeg
    IMG_4548.jpeg
    107.3 KB · Views: 57