• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 932 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Khato said:
The servethehome variant of the article, without subscription requirement - https://www.servethehome.com/intel-cancels-its-mainstream-next-gen-xeon-server-processors/

Definitely an interesting move, cancel the 8 channel variant to leave only the 16 channel platform.
Click to expand...

The AP models haven't sold very well, even by newer node Xeon standards. It's basically cancelling it.

I'm assuming the issue is Foundry related. What's it going to take to get them to fab Xeons at TSMC?
 
jpiniero said:
The AP models haven't sold very well, even by newer node Xeon standards. It's basically cancelling it.

I'm assuming the issue is Foundry related. What's it going to take to get them to fab Xeons at TSMC?
Click to expand...
It's not foundry related .... Foundry is infinite US Money glitch IFS can simply ask for Money from US and Us will give it "National Security"
 
511 said:
They killed the 8Ch variant EDGE would have been fine with smaller SKUs like 32/64C
Click to expand...
That's the issue, their mainstream sockets did fine in the market.
Big sockets are a CSP domain and Intel capitulated in the cloud.

This is outright the dumbest move Intel could've done.
 
adroc_thurston said:
That's the issue, their mainstream sockets did fine in the market.
Big sockets are a CSP domain and Intel capitulated in the cloud.

This is outright the dumbest move Intel could've done.
Click to expand...

To recap:

Intel has high market share in Enterprise, Edge, with smaller servers. Cancels DMR for future smaller servers.

Intel struggles to gain a foothold at high end of the market with big servers for hyperscalers. Intel keeps DMR for this market.

Can you explain, like I am 12 year old, how this makes sense?
 
Joe NYC said:
To recap:

Intel has high market share in Enterprise, Edge, with smaller servers. Cancels DMR for future smaller servers.

Intel struggles to gain a foothold at high end of the market with big servers for hyperscalers. Intel keeps DMR for this market.

Can you explain, like I am 12 year old, how this makes sense?
Click to expand...
It's Intel using their brains
 
adroc_thurston said:
I guess they're hoping market inertia keeps SP8 Venice away while the DMR-AP wins them some cloud sockets?
Click to expand...

It looks to me like AMD is preparing for a major assault on the segment, with 2 types of Venice SP8 SKUs (classic and dense).

So, Intel needs to be extra competitive to hold this market...
 
511 said:
It's Intel using their brains
Click to expand...

Could it be that with the remaining human resources (after the layoffs) and the need to produce a server CPU dedicated to NVidia, that Intel simply does not have the resources to do it? (In timely manner)?
 
Joe NYC said:
Could it be that with the remaining human resources (after the layoffs) and the need to produce a server CPU dedicated to NVidia, that Intel simply does not have the resources to do it? (In timely manner)?
Click to expand...
Who the hell cares about NV slop.
It's an I/O tile swap job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top