Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 934 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

inquiss

Senior member
Oct 13, 2010
561
818
136
Relying on brand loyalty only, I would presume? Surely someone has a reason, and Tan probably had to ultimately approve it, so there must be a reason.
Could contracts lock companies into buying from the vendor what's on the roadmap? So they have to buy the 16ch platform. I have no idea how that part works.

Could they just bot have enough good people to design and validate both platforms? Seems dumb too.

Can't think of a reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josh128

Kepler_L2

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2020
1,031
4,405
136
Could contracts lock companies into buying from the vendor what's on the roadmap? So they have to buy the 16ch platform. I have no idea how that part works.

Could they just bot have enough good people to design and validate both platforms? Seems dumb too.

Can't think of a reason.
Maybe it's a margins thing


DMR-SP probably couldn't be competitive vs Venice SP8 at 50%+ margins, so they decided to cancel it instead of dragging company margins down.
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
894
827
106
CFO said:
But in admitting that it will take a “multi-year process” for Intel to make big competitive moves in the business, Zinser said the company’s upcoming “Diamond Rapids” server product line due for launch next year “doesn’t get us quite there.”

“In certain cases the performance is actually better, but in other cases it’s not. And so we’ve got more work to do to finally get to a place,” he said.

Zinsner called the successor to “Diamond Rapids,” code-named “Coral Rapids,” the “real opportunity” that will let Intel “take a really good step forward.”

Without SMT, DMR does not compete up to Venice SP8 32x4=128c/256T. Let's hope Intel speed up the launching of Coral Rapids which supposedly fabbed by 18A-P node.