MoistOintment
Member
- Jul 31, 2024
- 101
- 153
- 76
If you're so confident, go on CDW or Insight's website and find me a single Turin Server that's cost competitive and in stock. Or even your Enterprise distributer of choice (Not that that's necessarily valid because I can't just convince procurement department to change corporate suppliers on the off chance I may be able to shave a few grand off our annual server procurement costs)About that . . .
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. And even if the many Ice Lake-SP systems are dispersed over large geographical areas, there are lower core-count/lower clockspeed Turin products that could slot in just as easily at a better TCO. TCO matters, especially if these systems are going to be in place for long periods of time. The only advantage for the Ice Lake-SP systems are availability and cost of entry.
See above, in terms of TCO, a newer/better uarch + process should yield superior results.
We're talking about 16 core and less rack mount servers that'll sit idle between 6pm and 7am. Servers that'll have a dozen HDDs in RAID10 that'll consume more power than the CPU ever will. I promise you, in this market, the TCO for Turin isn't there. And it clearly shows in the server volume that this is a large market. These companies aren't all stocked with idiots.