brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 29,867
- 30,661
- 136
So sao123 has been on multiple times since posting he was too busy to review the responses to his posts in this thread. I'm starting to think he pulled the rip cord.
It's the same here. Rural folks express their gratitude by claiming innate moral superiority over the city folks who subsidize the rural lifestyle.Here in UK, as in most countries, most services are vastly more-expensive to provide in rural areas because of the low-population density, hence are cross-subsidised by urban areas. Buses, Post offices and post delivery, police, telephone, electricity, banks, roads, other utilities, all cost more becuase of the longer-distances and lower population-density.
Car travel is not taxed at the level it ought to be, given the environmental costs it imposes on others, because rural people are so reliant on it.
Is it different in the US?
Its more than just city folk subsidies.It's the same here. Rural folks express their gratitude by claiming innate moral superiority over the city folks who subsidize the rural lifestyle.
Its more than just city folk subsidies.
Theres also federal bailouts for farmers on a regular basis. And sometimes other dying jobs not directly farm related.
Work... as in some of us still have to go there despite the Covid-19, the riots, the looting, and everything else going on in the world.
I hope @sao123 gets a chance to review this thread soon. Poor guy must be working his fingers to the bone. Except for being on the forum 20 minutes ago.Oh Noes!
It won't be sustained, and it isn't even remotely as high as any of those polls show.Yeah, that Fox News poll just brought the polling average up to a wee under +9 for Biden. 538 has it own polling average up as of this morning. It is generally better than RCP:
![]()
Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News
ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
That is one whopping lead. If I had any one wish right now, it's that we could hold the election tomorrow.
This Biden surge really started around 6/5 or so, and it's been getting wider and wider since. Let's hope this can be sustained.
You’re saying the polls are all wrong? On what basis?It won't be sustained, and it isn't even remotely as high as any of those polls show.
Take a look at any of the battleground state polls back in 2016 and the final results. There are Trump voters who are not being counted, likely almost everywhere.You’re saying the polls are all wrong? On what basis?
It won't be sustained, and it isn't even remotely as high as any of those polls show.
Take a look at any of the battleground state polls back in 2016 and the final results. There are Trump voters who are not being counted, likely almost everywhere.
I hope @sao123 gets a chance to review this thread soon. Poor guy must be working his fingers to the bone. Except for being on the forum 20 minutes ago.
Oh Piss off....Anandtech forums is my homepage... so every time my kid launches the browser to go to facebook, i go online, whether im at the computer or not.
I've got more than enough work to do than to sit around taking lip from some paper pusher in one of those cushy 37.5 hour per week office jobs where everyone sits around sipping coffee typing on a computer.
538's tipping point analysis is even more informative. Currently biden is within a point in both Texas and Georgia. If those two are in play, this is over as soon as the polls close.
The race would have to tighten by about 6 points to even enter competitive territory. And unfortunately for trump (fortunately for the rest of the world), he just doesn't have that kind of ceiling.
If Trump is going to insist on running the entire general election like a GOP primary dogfight then I think it is entirely possible he fails to close the gap much at all absent some really extraordinary stroke of luck. Comey provided that in 2016 but it's 2020 and we've got at least 3 major generational level crises at work that he's Mr Butterfingers with.
Yea, that is the problem, whether it can be sustained. And of course, it is not the popular vote that wins, but the electoral college. One thing from 2016 though, it shows the polls really are not very reliable in predicting a winner.Yeah, that Fox News poll just brought the polling average up to a wee under +9 for Biden. 538 has it own polling average up as of this morning. It is generally better than RCP:
![]()
Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News
ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
That is one whopping lead. If I had any one wish right now, it's that we could hold the election tomorrow.
This Biden surge really started around 6/5 or so, and it's been getting wider and wider since. Let's hope this can be sustained.
Famous last words. The same thing that was said about Trump in 2016. The telling factor will be whether those who "approve" of Biden will turn out in big numbers and whether they will actually vote for him, despite who they "approve" of. OTOH, you can bet those who approve of Trump will turn out in very large numbers (percentage wise).It's always best to talk about boring numbers when discussing polls. Specifically, those battleground state polls, on average, showed Clinton about +3 at the finish line while Trump won those three states by less than 1%. So those three battleground polls were off by 3-4% depending on the state. Battleground state polls are less reliable than popular vote polling because there are fewer of them are they are of lower quality.
The popular vote polling average was only off by +1 blue in 2016. It showed Clinton up by 3 and she won by 2. Right now it shows Biden +9, and swing states polls are showing +5 - +10 right now.
There is no way that Biden would not win this election if held right now. No chance.
Yea, that is the problem, whether it can be sustained. And of course, it is not the popular vote that wins, but the electoral college. One thing from 2016 though, it shows the polls really are not very reliable in predicting a winner.
I think a lot of people took this away from 2016 and it is badly wrong.Yea, that is the problem, whether it can be sustained. And of course, it is not the popular vote that wins, but the electoral college. One thing from 2016 though, it shows the polls really are not very reliable in predicting a winner.
I dunno, still think we will see a second term President Trump.