I think tribalism answers this question pretty well. They aren't against the idea of federal aid to people, they are just against federal aid to the undeserving, the undeserving people being those not part of their political and cultural tribe.conservatives seem to demand all of the glory of unrestrained capitalism, but none of the consequences--say, like when your dead, obsolete industry disappears, the individual shouldn't be responsible for learning how to compete in the new world, and should just get paid to do nothing.
I don't get it: dude demands that people live by their means, live off the barter system, but also cries and moans under the assumption that the evil government is doing nothing to help them.
It's quite perplexing how one can hold these diametrically opposed views. It must be frustrating, because the solution you demand is also the one that you claim to hate. Maybe this explains the anger?
I don't mind that the coastal urban areas subsidize the interior rural ones but I do admit it bothers me that the rural people apparently don't know it. They appear to genuinely believe that the cities are living off them and not the other way around, which is both baffling and enraging. They are taking our money while claiming they're doing us a favor.