Florida High School Shooting

Page 91 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
  • Like
Reactions: rise

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Arming teachers could work but it probably won't right. First of all do you really want volatile underpaid overstressed teachers coming to work armed and then dealing with your snotbag mouthy kid and expect them not everyone once in a while to pull out the weapon? Also how is a teacher supposed to determine the shooter in a chaotic seen like that? Don't forget Nick Cruz slipped out amongst the fleeing kids. It's very likely that a bunch of teachers roaming the halls looking for a shooter may bump off a couple of suspicious looking Innocents or even just due to nerves when they are surprised and on edge looking for the active shooter

Teachers are teachers. Not soldiers
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
I'm sorry, I thought your read the earlier links posted. It's also been used successfully in Israel over the years.
I read both, they were fairly vacuous. Neither offered anything to suggest any of the evidence for which I asked. Neither mentions Israel either. So really, I fail to see how your response has any value.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,821
136
No, they teachers and faculty members are stepping forward and volunteering to perform the task. If no teachers or faculty step forward to help. So it goes.

The problem with volunteering is that it produces inconsistent security at best. You're basically gambling that enough people will volunteer to make a difference, that those volunteers will happen to be in the right place at the right time, and that they'll be effective if they do get to draw their weapons. Between 1998 and 2006, the average hit rate for an NYPD officer firing their gun was 18 percent. Do you think a volunteer with less training and much less experience is going to do better?

It'd be better than nothing, but it wouldn't be significantly better than nothing. If the notion of arming staff is going to be truly effective, you'd need a defense that's both always available and effective... and frankly, I'd rather address the loose regulations and gun-happy culture that enable mass murders than to treat schools like they're perpetually 5 minutes away from a massacre.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Arming teachers could work but it probably won't right. First of all do you really want volatile underpaid overstressed teachers coming to work armed and then dealing with your snotbag mouthy kid and expect them not everyone once in a while to pull out the weapon? Also how is a teacher supposed to determine the shooter in a chaotic seen like that? Don't forget Nick Cruz slipped out amongst the fleeing kids. It's very likely that a bunch of teachers roaming the halls looking for a shooter may bump off a couple of suspicious looking Innocents or even just due to nerves when they are surprised and on edge looking for the active shooter

Teachers are teachers. Not soldiers
He was the one holding a rifle? Remember one of the heroes that died was an "unarmed" security guard that used his body to shield kids, he later died in surgery.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
Occurs to me....
WHY do we have so many mass school shootings but never an US CONGRESS mass shooting?
Surely we have a lot more insane, deranged, politicians serving in the US congress than we have insane kids attending schools.
Think about it......
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
The problem with volunteering is that it produces inconsistent security at best. You're basically gambling that enough people will volunteer to make a difference, that those volunteers will happen to be in the right place at the right time, and that they'll be effective if they do get to draw their weapons. Between 1998 and 2006, the average hit rate for an NYPD officer firing their gun was 18 percent. Do you think a volunteer with less training and much less experience is going to do better?

It'd be better than nothing, but it wouldn't be significantly better than nothing. If the notion of arming staff is going to be truly effective, you'd need a defense that's both always available and effective... and frankly, I'd rather address the loose regulations and gun-happy culture that enable mass murders than to treat schools like they're perpetually 5 minutes away from a massacre.

Would it be better than nothing if trained professionals missed their intended targets 82% of the time? Sounds like having teachers accidentally shooting innocent children would be significantly worse.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
I read both, they were fairly vacuous. Neither offered anything to suggest any of the evidence for which I asked. Neither mentions Israel either. So really, I fail to see how your response has any value.
It's a partial solution, do with it what you want. Maybe you can #gun control a few hundred times.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Would it be better than nothing if trained professionals missed their intended targets 82% of the time? Sounds like having teachers accidentally shooting innocent children would be significantly worse.
Like what the police did in Columbine? Yeah, it happens.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
If you have no evidence that it will improve things, and as we've already discussed, odds are that it will make them worse, is it really a solution?
It's a very good partial solution. Having mental health professionals forced to report patients with violent tendencies will also help.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
That was the guy who”s son said more guns is the answer.
He also pushed for more background checks and better mental health care.

Remember that after Sandy Hook, almost nothing happened. For us to get universal background checks alone would be a HUGE victory for gun control.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
Has anyone seen any info/discussion on how the shooter was able to carry a long gun (rifle), presumably out in the open, from his car, across school lawn, through front door and up to the 3rd floor with no one noticing?

Fern

I *think* I heard he had it wrapped up with something like a coat.
I may be wrong
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
It's working in school districts across this state and my bet it will begin to be instituted across the country over the next months and years. We'll see.
As I've asked, provide objective evidence that it is working. Otherwise, you're just making things up. Which is fine, but at least be honest about it.