Florida High School Shooting

Page 93 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 25, 2011
17,162
9,680
146
At least he didn’t do a Sara P. and write it on his hand.
You didn’t notice his cuff did you? He apparently needs a reminder he’s not Obama (44).

zJh9AOW.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundforbjt

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
But if they never had a shooting before or after the armed presence , there’s no way to know if it’s effective.

You can’t prove a negative for armed school volunteers anymore than you could for the assault weapon ban. Won’t stop either side from relatively extreme solutions that cater to their existing preferences. No one seems interested in smaller solutions that might help, say pilot “free” (read: taxpayer funded) voluntary universal background checks without needing FFL to process and see if that helps at all. The adoption rate for free might surprise you and be worth the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,824
33,450
136
You can’t prove a negative for armed school volunteers anymore than you could for the assault weapon ban. Won’t stop either side from relatively extreme solutions that cater to their existing preferences. No one seems interested in smaller solutions that might help, say pilot “free” (read: taxpayer funded) voluntary universal background checks without needing FFL to process and see if that helps at all. The adoption rate for free might surprise you and be worth the cost.
What is the position of local police departments on arming teachers?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,824
33,450
136
You didn’t notice his cuff did you? He apparently needs a reminder he’s not Obama (44).

zJh9AOW.jpg
Clearly he isn't paying much attention to this issue. And he ragged Obama for using a teleprompter??

He sat there emotionless the entire time. Looked disengaged. The only 2 things he cared about was getting out his talking points and getting the hell out of the room.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,231
55,778
136
Nope, but I bet something that's a workable help and a partial solution to school violence makes you angry. Sorry.

There’s no evidence whatsoever that more marginally trained people firing weapons would solve school violence. You’re just making that up.

Also, can you point me to a single case of gun violence where you don’t think more guns are the answer?
 

Kwatt

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2000
1,602
12
81
You can’t prove a negative for armed school volunteers anymore than you could for the assault weapon ban. Won’t stop either side from relatively extreme solutions that cater to their existing preferences. No one seems interested in smaller solutions that might help, say pilot “free” (read: taxpayer funded) voluntary universal background checks without needing FFL to process and see if that helps at all. The adoption rate for free might surprise you and be worth the cost.

I could get behind that easily. With the caveat that firearm type (except for rifle, shotgun, or handgun) is not used and no requiring of serial #'s. Also, it must be fixed so it could not be modified in the future. I will not leave an opening for a last minute addition via a spending bill.
This will be a part of anything I vote for!

I will not be a part of anything that could lead to a Cali. type confiscation. Where the people registered the rifle as the law required and then were notified they had to turn them in.

.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
There’s no evidence whatsoever that more marginally trained people firing weapons would solve school violence. You’re just making that up.

Also, can you point me to a single case of gun violence where you don’t think more guns are the answer?
Security professionals in various counties disagree with you, but you're an internet troll, you know more than they do.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Norway's gun violence death rate is 1.75 per 100,000 people.

The United States' gun violence death rate is 10.54 per 100,000 people.

Thanks for proving my point.
Tell it to all the kids he killed. Ooops sorry they're dead. I guess if you call that "working" you win.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,019
11,728
136
Norway's gun violence death rate is 1.75 per 100,000 people.

The United States' gun violence death rate is 10.54 per 100,000 people.

Thanks for proving my point.

"Well, they either have 1/10th the crazy people or no access to evil video games and hollywood violence"
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheVrolok

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
"Well, they either have 1/10th the crazy people or no access to evil video games and hollywood violence"

And 0% of the war on drugs and lot less of the gangs that drive a lot of gun violence in the U.S. I don’t know if I can pull up the exact stats without a bit of googling but IIRC if you exclude black and Hispanic males aged 15-24 the firearms crimes rate mirrors that of Europe and elsewhere in the industrial world.

sTbiw2S8fHl89qyY6AXbohcKkvXrCTKg33VwEQ-n-JieBT9aW1mr8d8s65TxJJj-nOCRfN6e1L_wJ8qC8efdaa530z35xQ_cwcGE2g-n98rRB7SprMFZrnpjhvEUgxNKyK_h_OU
szi6ZE
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,019
11,728
136
And 0% of the war on drugs and lot less of the gangs that drive a lot of gun violence in the U.S. I don’t know if I can pull up the exact stats without a bit of googling but IIRC if you exclude black and Hispanic males aged 15-24 the firearms crimes rate mirrors that of Europe and elsewhere in the industrial world.

sTbiw2S8fHl89qyY6AXbohcKkvXrCTKg33VwEQ-n-JieBT9aW1mr8d8s65TxJJj-nOCRfN6e1L_wJ8qC8efdaa530z35xQ_cwcGE2g-n98rRB7SprMFZrnpjhvEUgxNKyK_h_OU
szi6ZE

I'm all for ending the war on drugs, which coincidentally enough, would drastically reduce the data point you've removed from the stats. Also, I find it interesting that the data starts in 2000 and ends in 2014. Conveniently excluding Columbine and the recent rash of high casualty events while including the Brevik shooting.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
I'm all for ending the war on drugs, which coincidentally enough, would drastically reduce the data point you've removed from the stats. Also, I find it interesting that the data starts in 2000 and ends in 2014. Conveniently excluding Columbine and the recent rash of high casualty events while including the Brevik shooting.

Selection bias is going to be an issue with any image you'd find in a quick google search. Again the point isn't to try to minimize U.S. violence but put it into context; mass shootings tend to be more frequent here but mass shootings/casualty events in other countries often are much higher casualty events making the long-term per capita rates a lot closer together than one might think. For example the single event of the November 2015 Paris attacks killed as many people (130) as the top 3 U.S. mass shootings put together (2017 Las Vegas - 50, 2016 Orlando - 49, 2007 VA Tech - 32).
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
He was the one holding a rifle? Remember one of the heroes that died was an "unarmed" security guard that used his body to shield kids, he later died in surgery.
It is not easy to find a shooter within a crowd of fleeing people. Even more so, you want young people with education degrees to perform headshots whilst minimizing collateral damage with ice water in their veins under the threat of their own lives. Why not ask NBA players to write quantum physics papers?