soundforbjt
Lifer
- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,041
- 136
It just ran off a couple of minutes ago.Marco Rubio looks good with a spine.
It just ran off a couple of minutes ago.Marco Rubio looks good with a spine.
We also had three tv networks all reporting the same news in the same way, not with three different opinions. That was reserved for the Sunday political shows or editorialsIt's very strange to watching want to see metal detectors and armed teachers?
I don't remember these growing up? People still hunted. The Dad behind and on both sides next door had shotguns, rifles, and pistols... just like we did. I'll be God damned if there wasn't a few bat-crazy as shit people out there, too. Hell some even in the extended family. Seemed everyone had a crazy Uncle back then, too... Hmm... it just seems like we were missing out on something back then...
No it didn't. He's doing a helluva lot better than the two toads who are up there saying what they think people want to hear.It just ran off a couple of minutes ago.
This shitstain of a human is our president. 60,000,000+ people wanted him as president. What the fuck has happened to this country? What the actual fuck happened?You didn’t notice his cuff did you? He apparently needs a reminder he’s not Obama (44).
![]()
This shitstain of a human is our president. 60,000,000+ people wanted him as president. What the fuck has happened to this country? What the actual fuck happened?
No you don't know that gun control doesn't work. That's your opinion not fact.Fvckhole, they have been ongoing for years. They are working. I do know that gun control doesn't work, it never has before.
One paper released today, first-authored by Lois K. Lee of Harvard Medical School, examined five types of gun laws: “those that (1) curb gun trafficking, (2) strengthen background checks, (3) improve child safety, (4) ban military-style assault weapons, and (5) restrict firearms in public places and leniency in firearm carrying.” The researchers found strong evidence that laws strengthening background checks and purchase permits helped decrease gun homicide rates. Interestingly, the researchers did not find strong evidence that laws focusing on trafficking, child safety and assault weapons decreased firearm homicides. The evidence for the effects of laws regarding guns in public places was not conclusive either way. On the whole, though, they found that, “stronger gun policies were associated with decreased rates of firearm homicide, even after adjusting for demographic and sociologic factors.”
She really is. People are shouting some pretty nasty, personal things.Dana Loesch is earning every dollar of her paycheck. She's doing a damn fine job as spokesperson in a hostile environment.
Kudos to her for facing them her and Rubio. Give credit where credit is due. I'm not liking her answers, she's giving about 70% answer, 30% filler bullshit. And these kids, jesus, they're better reporters than the pros with their "the question you've been avoiding is..... please answer it"She really is. People are shouting some pretty nasty, personal things.
Of course, it’ seems that has become standard procedure . The age of Trump.Meanwhile, the right wing slime machine does its usual thing-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...27a6ccb38eb_story.html?utm_term=.b06ba21dc41b
This shitstain of a human is our president. 60,000,000+ people wanted him as president. What the fuck has happened to this country? What the actual fuck happened?
Blame it on whoever you want but at the end of the day your party ran candidates that lost to 'W' twice and to Trump. Run candidates that are worth voting for and you might have a shot. Run a candidate in '20 on the 'anybody but Trump platform' like you did against Bush in '04 and Trump is going to beat you. Again.Decades of divisive emotionally rousing right wing agitprop happened. With trickle down, of course.
Rubio took the heat and wouldn’t waver on taking NRA money, more balls then trump.Kudos to her for facing them her and Rubio. Give credit where credit is due. I'm not liking her answers, she's giving about 70% answer, 30% filler bullshit. And these kids, jesus, they're better reporters than the pros with their "the question you've been avoiding is..... please answer it"
Awesome. They have my deepest respect for that.
You realize he is in no way talking about candidates and elections right?Blame it on whoever you want but at the end of the day your party ran candidates that lost to 'W' twice and to Trump. Run candidates that are worth voting for and you might have a shot. Run a candidate in '20 on the 'anybody but Trump platform' like you did against Bush in '04 and Trump is going to beat you. Again.
No not right but thanks for weighing in.You realize he is in no way talking about candidates and elections right?
Blame it on whoever you want but at the end of the day your party ran candidates that lost to 'W' twice and to Trump. Run candidates that are worth voting for and you might have a shot. Run a candidate in '20 on the 'anybody but Trump platform' like you did against Bush in '04 and Trump is going to beat you. Again.
People voted and it pisses you off, that's what happened.This shitstain of a human is our president. 60,000,000+ people wanted him as president. What the fuck has happened to this country? What the actual fuck happened?
You use the term agitprop pretty frequently. Merriam has a pretty clear definition. Can you give me an example of right wing agitprop in 1. literature 2. art 3. drama 4. music? Just curious what a die hard socialist would consider examples in each of those areas.I obviously conceded that right wing agitprop works, didn't I? Your comment merely reiterates my point. They have you in the bag.
