Cops Raid FLDS Compound in Texas

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: eleison


For the millions that died.. for the millions who had families ripped apart because of Nazis, I would think they would find it appalling and insulting that we are not standing up to this injustice or ANY injustice -- no matter how small. After all, for the millions that died in this repressed and prejudice group, it all started with one innocuous "star" being sewn on their coats. Nobody stood up.

If the government can take away your daughters and sons because they don't like your lifestyle, what else can they do?

Get a fvcking clue. A government can take away your children if you are not providing rights the children deserve. A right to education. A right to join the society. A right to not getting physically and mentally abused. Those men and women in FLDS can live in any life style they want, as long as their children are given education, belong to the society, have the ability to experience and choose the life style the desire, and not being forced into marrying men in their 50's when they are still a child.

you might also want to get a clue.

those are not rights.

Go educate yourself
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: eleison


For the millions that died.. for the millions who had families ripped apart because of Nazis, I would think they would find it appalling and insulting that we are not standing up to this injustice or ANY injustice -- no matter how small. After all, for the millions that died in this repressed and prejudice group, it all started with one innocuous "star" being sewn on their coats. Nobody stood up.

If the government can take away your daughters and sons because they don't like your lifestyle, what else can they do?

Get a fvcking clue. A government can take away your children if you are not providing rights the children deserve. A right to education. A right to join the society. A right to not getting physically and mentally abused. Those men and women in FLDS can live in any life style they want, as long as their children are given education, belong to the society, have the ability to experience and choose the life style the desire, and not being forced into marrying men in their 50's when they are still a child.

you might also want to get a clue.

those are not rights.

Go educate yourself

:roll:
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Robor
Seriously? You're going to argue underage mothers isn't proof of anything? So you're ok with a 16 year old being pregnant by a 50 year old man? What I read on them (FLDS) a girl is eligible to marry when she can carry a child. If that's common practice in this community it deserved to be raided.

Edited for clarity


because a 16 yr old is not proof of anything. it happens every day in every religion.

Also the fact they can't find ANY underage girls who are pregnant kinda hurts.

I thought they found underage pregnancies? If that (bolded) is the case then I'll agree with you that it's possible a raid was not warranted. However, if it's common practice for young girls to be married older men against their will that would do it for me.

 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: eleison


For the millions that died.. for the millions who had families ripped apart because of Nazis, I would think they would find it appalling and insulting that we are not standing up to this injustice or ANY injustice -- no matter how small. After all, for the millions that died in this repressed and prejudice group, it all started with one innocuous "star" being sewn on their coats. Nobody stood up.

If the government can take away your daughters and sons because they don't like your lifestyle, what else can they do?

Get a fvcking clue. A government can take away your children if you are not providing rights the children deserve. A right to education. A right to join the society. A right to not getting physically and mentally abused. Those men and women in FLDS can live in any life style they want, as long as their children are given education, belong to the society, have the ability to experience and choose the life style the desire, and not being forced into marrying men in their 50's when they are still a child.

Not according to the laws of the United States. Agree or disagree with the validity of the law, polygamy is illegal.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Larry King Live Interview (video):

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid...kl.inside.polygamy.cnn

More information is being revealed. After looking at some other info and researching this subject it seems like the women and children are first brainwashed from birth to accept this lifestyle. It looks like the longer men practice this polygamy lifestyle the more it becomes twisted and evil and the less rights women and children have. It is like these FLDS groups are from another planet.

It is thought that possible the person who made the call may be someone who escaped the ranch. The law in the USA is what allows these people to hide what they are doing. Private ownership of land privacy laws only enable this kind of behaviour.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Robor
Seriously? You're going to argue underage mothers isn't proof of anything? So you're ok with a 16 year old being pregnant by a 50 year old man? What I read on them (FLDS) a girl is eligible to marry when she can carry a child. If that's common practice in this community it deserved to be raided.

Edited for clarity


because a 16 yr old is not proof of anything. it happens every day in every religion.

Also the fact they can't find ANY underage girls who are pregnant kinda hurts.

I thought they found underage pregnancies? If that (bolded) is the case then I'll agree with you that it's possible a raid was not warranted. However, if it's common practice for young girls to be married older men against their will that would do it for me.


unless something has changed from last night (havent watched TV or read any news sites yet). they had not found ANY pregnant underage girls.

while yes i agree forcing young girls to marry older men is sickening its not a cause to take the children away from the mothers.

There are reports that the people in charge of the raid even lied ot the mothers.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Citrix
he isnt stupid he has a valid point. The news last night covered this and i agree, the cops did this on ONE complaint by ONE girl. It hasnt even been proven true at all, is that enough reason to rip families apart?

Why does it matter how/why this abuse was reported? The proof is underage children being mothers.

really? wow thats amazing. so the 15 year olds having babies all over the country is proof!
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: eleison


For the millions that died.. for the millions who had families ripped apart because of Nazis, I would think they would find it appalling and insulting that we are not standing up to this injustice or ANY injustice -- no matter how small. After all, for the millions that died in this repressed and prejudice group, it all started with one innocuous "star" being sewn on their coats. Nobody stood up.

If the government can take away your daughters and sons because they don't like your lifestyle, what else can they do?

Get a fvcking clue. A government can take away your children if you are not providing rights the children deserve. A right to education. A right to join the society. A right to not getting physically and mentally abused. Those men and women in FLDS can live in any life style they want, as long as their children are given education, belong to the society, have the ability to experience and choose the life style the desire, and not being forced into marrying men in their 50's when they are still a child.

you might also want to get a clue.

those are not rights.

Go educate yourself

hahahah WTF?

here you go ill educate you.

Children are generally afforded the basic rights embodied by the Constitution
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
FLDS has a rich history of polygamy and child rape. Why this is so hard to grasp is beyond me.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Arkaign
FLDS has a rich history of polygamy and child rape. Why this is so hard to grasp is beyond me.

nobody is denying that.

I am against child rape (personally think polygamy should be legal with adults). BUT i am also against unlawful raids and takeign children without proof or reason.

right now there has not been any proof shown.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: piasabird
Larry King Live Interview (video):

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid...kl.inside.polygamy.cnn

More information is being revealed. After looking at some other info and researching this subject it seems like the women and children are first brainwashed from birth to accept this lifestyle. It looks like the longer men practice this polygamy lifestyle the more it becomes twisted and evil and the less rights women and children have. It is like these FLDS groups are from another planet.

It is thought that possible the person who made the call may be someone who escaped the ranch. The law in the USA is what allows these people to hide what they are doing. Private ownership of land privacy laws only enable this kind of behaviour.

When someone disagrees with you, just say they are "brain washed" and that they require going to "re-education" camps and have their kids taken away.. How many societies have used that line of thinking before (hint: cambodia under pol pot, communist china under mao, soviet union under stalin, etc...)

When people start bringing out the "brain wash" card out, it usually means they no longer have any valid arguments left.

No proof of wrong doing even after 4 years of investigation... but still the witch hunt and broken families continues...
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

the women and children do not have to cooperate.

i suspect you are right. hopefully they have proof. but wouldnt shock me if they didnt
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

so with no proof the government can come in and take your kids. geee thats just great!
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Citrix
he isnt stupid he has a valid point. The news last night covered this and i agree, the cops did this on ONE complaint by ONE girl. It hasnt even been proven true at all, is that enough reason to rip families apart?

Why does it matter how/why this abuse was reported? The proof is underage children being mothers.

really? wow thats amazing. so the 15 year olds having babies all over the country is proof!

Sigh. I'm talking about underage women having babies of older men. Like this >> Story

Barlow, 50, is on probation in Arizona for a conviction stemming from his marriage to a 'different 16-year-old girl, with whom he has a son. '
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

then they should have had PROOF before they did the raid and only separated the familes who were committing the crimes. doesn't it bother you that children were taken away from their parents who did nothing wrong?
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

then they should have had PROOF before they did the raid and only separated the familes who were committing the crimes. doesn't it bother you that children were taken away from their parents who did nothing wrong?
Anytime a minor makes the type of complaint that the investigators recieved from the missing 16 year old then They HAVE to act upon it. That is the risk we assume whenever a cry for help is made from any child.

And I still think that your definition of "family" does not fit this case. The investigators cannot sort out the "families" and therefore the process is slowed down.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

then they should have had PROOF before they did the raid and only separated the familes who were committing the crimes. doesn't it bother you that children were taken away from their parents who did nothing wrong?

If it comes out that the allegations were completely false then I'll agree it was wrong to raid them and separate their families. That said, I think once all the facts are out the raid will have been warranted.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
one other point.

It does not bother me that all the children were taken away. Without a doubt those children that can be released to go back to their families will be released, after an investigation.

But this is like a shark swimming in the waters with the guppies...you dont take some of the guppies out of the water while the shark is still out there.

You either remove all the guppies or you take out the shark.

With the type of polygimist environment the investigators are faced with I don't think they have much of a choice. Can you imagine if they only went in there and removed the one teenager that complained and left the other children there? they would still be exposed to the sharks! and probably some pissed off sharks at that!!

that wouldnt be right imho.
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
Originally posted by: Modelworks
You sound like a textbook.
I'm not taking this stuff from some book I read.
Its from dealing with people day in and out to try to help them.
I've looked people in the eye as they tell their story.

Now I know you're full of it. I'm doubting you even work a hot line.
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

then they should have had PROOF before they did the raid and only separated the familes who were committing the crimes. doesn't it bother you that children were taken away from their parents who did nothing wrong?

If it comes out that the allegations were completely false then I'll agree it was wrong to raid them and separate their families. That said, I think once all the facts are out the raid will have been warranted.

If what I heard on the news yesterday true and there are 16-17 year olds with 4 children already the raid was warranted.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Actually preagnant 12 year olds show up at the hospital preagnant now, in every large metropolitan area. So this is not that big of a deal. The problem is that not much actual news about this case is being published or released by officials in Texas. This must mean that they did not have any real evidence or they have completely botched this case from the get go without any prior planning of how they were going to proceed. Seems like they just barged in there with guns and now they expect the courts to solve their problems. This is a complex case and the way that child services is set up they are not prepared with a method they can use to address the legal issues. Normally Child Services needs to investigate about what is going on before they can bring a case. One of the things that appears to be happening is that this group has a kind of hive mentality and they back each other up, and they all work together to hide evidence and protect their way of life. So it will not be easy to bring a case against them. The FLDS people have legal rights also and the system makes it easy for them to hide behind the law.

The minor problem is who made the complaint? The complaint only justified removing the children from one family unit according to the law. So something else really wierd must be going on that they are not exactly explaining. This is confusing the public.
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: Socio


If what I heard on the news yesterday true and there are 16-17 year olds with 4 children already the raid was warranted.


The media has a tendency to sensationalize (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...iversity_lacrosse_case, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley) regardless of the truth. What I don't understand is that if there are 16-17 year olds with 4 children, why don't they charge somebody with something? Isn't that proof enough? But yet, the government leaves the public with no information and basically charge no one -- leaving the "perpetrators" (if there are any) to go free to "abuse" other children while at the same time, the government continues to rip families apart.

I call shens on the whole raid!!! 4 years and no proof... but yet, only now are they breaking families apart because of "eminent" danger. Why didn't they do this 4 years ago? How come "little Tommy" is in danger now and not 4 years ago. This whole raid is a charade. This is not about protecting kids, its about justifying an unjustifiable raid.. In all likelihood, the only people who will be hurt here are the kids and their families as the government tries to cover their assesss.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Socio
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: OrByte
I dont think you will see any "proof" until a law enforcement delievers evidence to the DAs office and that evidence is evaluated.

Im just saying it might take time. Also consider that there is zero cooperation by the women and children.

I totally agree here.

then they should have had PROOF before they did the raid and only separated the familes who were committing the crimes. doesn't it bother you that children were taken away from their parents who did nothing wrong?

If it comes out that the allegations were completely false then I'll agree it was wrong to raid them and separate their families. That said, I think once all the facts are out the raid will have been warranted.

If what I heard on the news yesterday true and there are 16-17 year olds with 4 children already the raid was warranted.

OMGWTFBBQ!!! FIRE UP THE SWAT TEAM AND LETS RAID THE GHETTO!!!