lol at the arguments. Remember the movie U-571? The studios cast Matthew McConaughey as an American sub captain who found the enigma machine in World War 2 when it was the British? Same thing here. The studio cast Angelina Jolie because she will bring in the $$$.
This is not a history channel documentary. This is a business venture.
lol at the arguments. Remember the movie U-571? The studios cast Matthew McConaughey as an American sub captain who found the enigma machine in World War 2 when it was the British? Same thing here. The studio cast Angelina Jolie because she will bring in the $$$.
This is not a history channel documentary. This is a business venture.
Unfortunately, Cleopatra, strapped by great debt incurred under the reign of her father, Ptolemy Auletes (Ptolemy the flute-player), thought it imprudent to mint gold coins, so only lesser metals were used to commemorate her reign. The imprint on gold would have survived the centuries better than baser metals. Only ten individual coins from the reign of Cleopatra have survived in very good, but not mint condition, according to Guy Weill Goudchaux, in his article "Was Cleopatra Beautiful?" in the British Museum's publication "Cleopatra of Egypt: From History to Myth." This is significant because coins have provided excellent records of the faces of many monarchs. In one set of coins Cleopatra and Mark Antony look very similar. In another set, she has "an enormous neck and the features of a bird of prey."
So maybe Mark Antony loved Cleopatra for her mind. That is the conclusion being drawn by academics at Britain's University of Newcastle from a Roman denarius coin which depicts the celebrated queen of Egypt as a sharp-nosed, thin-lipped woman with a protruding chin.
LOL.
Studying race and ethnicity as a matter of anthropology is absolutely academic. It does not make you racist to want to study humans.
However, joining a KKK forum makes you racist.
Joining an Atheist forum makes you an Atheist.
Joining a Christian forum makes you religious.
Joining a Tech forum (like Anandtech) makes you a tech person.
What you choose to jump on, discuss and argue about tells you exactly all you need to know about your leanings and feelings.
i still say they should make her Japanese. a hot one with nice knockers...
She comes from an inbreeding Greek family with a dash of Semetic. She was clearly NOT black in appearence.
Jolie, while white and Native American, looks olive skinned and exotic. She also has a crazy seductress type personality. A rather perfect fit. The appearance would be rather like a lighter skinned Persian/Iranian is today.
So yes, it's ignorant afrocentric race baiting.
Calling Amused a piece of shit is really taking it too far.You are such a pos. No one knows what she looked like, so how the hell do you know? She wasn't white and she wasn't black either. She was something mixed, clearly with some ethnic features. Those are facts, not opinion. With those facts, the guy from essence is no more racist than you suggesting Jolie, who I like by the way, is the perfect fit. But hey I know talking to you about anything black or minority is useless. Amused you are a moron, but even you can't deny the fact she was not white. So the guy from essence suggest a black woman, which she was not. But you say a white woman, Jolie is the perfect fit, but she was not white either. You say its afrocentric race baiting, but what is the title for your race baiting? Because she wasn't black, but she wasn't white either.
Calling Amused a piece of shit is really taking it too far.
All I read in your post is blah-blah-blah. You haven't added a damn thing to this thread.
He could be purple for all I care. I just prefer him to be like Buddy Jesus.He's jus staying classy.
You know what I don't get... why all the Black people hatin on the white people but still loving on the White Jesus (who was actually an Arab)?
What? I thought TehMac made it clear she was half greek?
LOL...I'm going to have to assume that was just a limitation of the material being worked on and that Cleopatra was not, in fact, a goblin.
I don't see how that's ignorant.
If you are even slightly black, then you are black. And that's by the Whitey definition.
Considering that everyone agrees that Cleopatra is clearly not white, it makes more sense to cast her with someone who is not white ... yes?
Perhaps Essence was being over the top insisting on a black actress, but the other ones seemed to just want someone a little less pasty white.
Commentary: Another White Actress to Play Cleopatra?
Monday, June 14, 2010 | 3:00 PM
by Shirea L. Carroll
Read more: http://www.essence.com/entertainmen...musicfestivallogo-aolbv?cnn=yes#ixzz0rViqeVU8
Just when we thought there weren't enough leading roles for Black women in Hollywood, they create one and give it to a White woman.
Film producer Scott Rudin has purchased the film rights to upcoming biography 'Queen of the Nile, Cleopatra: A Life,' and has confirmed that the movie "is being developed for and with [Angelina] Jolie." Jolie, a Hollywood A-lister, will do her best in bringing the story of the famed Egyptian queen to life, and it appears no one doubts she can do it... including Pulitzer prize-winning author Stacy Schiff, who penned the biography, "Cleopatra: A Life," a book that won't be on shelves until the fall.
Schiff already heavily endorses Jolie, stating, "I think she'd be perfect for it and I can see a possible Oscar in her future. Physically, she's got the perfect look."
Gasp, the nerve! "She's got the perfect look?" Honestly, I don't care how full Angelina Jolie's lips are, how many African children she adopts, or how bronzed her skin will become for the film, I firmly believe this role should have gone to a Black woman. I mean, isn't it enough that 47 years ago, dame Elizabeth Taylor was cast to portray Cleopatra in one of the most expensive films ever made? That Elizabeth Taylor was actually the third White woman to be tapped for the Cleopatra role -- following Vivien Leigh and Claudette Colbert -- just makes this all the more comical.
Were Vanessa Williams, Halle Berry and Thandie Newton unavailable for auditions that day? Why does Hollywood think it's even slightly plausible to cast White women in roles that would be more sensible to cast a Black actress for? Especially when that role is an African queen.
It happened just two years ago, in 2007's thriller "Stuck," directed by Stuart Gordon, based on the true story of a Chante Mallard. The story tells a tale of a woman who hits a homeless man with her car and results with him trapped in her car's windshield. Instead of getting the man help, Mallard (played by actress Mena Suvari) opts to let him die slowly in her garage.
The interesting thing is Mallard is a Black woman, and Suvari, who was cast to play the role, is -- surprise, surprise -- a White woman. Adding insult to injury, instead of just casting a Black woman to play the role, the film gave Suvari a more "ethnic look" for the role, by adding stereotypical cornrows to her hair. Hollywood, are you serious?
Now, Jolie is set to play Cleopatra, who isn't as technically perfect as some would claim if you study the Queen of the Nile's distinguished history. First and foremost, the role should be given to a younger actress -- think Jurnee Smollett -- considering Cleopatra began her reign as Queen of Egypt at the tender age of 18 and ended her own life at the age of 39.
Secondly, while historically there is no concrete confirmation that Cleopatra was of a darker complexion, there is more evidence than not that she was Black, and not entirely of Macedonian Greek ancestry, as Shakespeare, leagues of painters and now Hollywood would have us believe. And, ultimately, while Cleopatra's heritage remains under speculation, it remains that she was in fact an African queen. Jolie -- not so perfect.
Calling Amused a piece of shit is really taking it too far.
All I read in your post is blah-blah-blah. You haven't added a damn thing to this thread.
I decided to post the essence commentary as well, so everyone can read the person's argument
I want to make some comments. One the writer isn't coming off as some stark raving racist. She gives Jolie her props, calling her an A-Lister. But then the writer touches on something that is true. When they cast Jolie, they will through makeup try to add some kind of ethnic features to her. That I don't think that is up for dispute. The writer then makes reference to the movie Stuck, which I never saw, where the race of the true chracter was not played by an actress of the same race. Thats a problem.
I know in the thread about the Green Lantern, I would have been pissed if they made him a black dude as rumored. But they fixed it,. The writer makes an argument just like myself and others have made that cleopatra's true racial makeup and look are up for debate, but its a fact she was not a white woman from Britain. That is a legitimate argument. And the writer's pick to play cleo, I can't say is a bad one at all.....
![]()
Were Vanessa Williams, Halle Berry and Thandie Newton unavailable for auditions that day? Why does Hollywood think it's even slightly plausible to cast White women in roles that would be more sensible to cast a Black actress for? Especially when that role is an African queen.
I read just fine.Maybe thats because you can't read. Just get it over and say I support Amused and stop whining.
You are such a pos. No one knows what she looked like, so how the hell do you know? She wasn't white and she wasn't black either. She was something mixed, clearly with some ethnic features. Those are facts, not opinion. With those facts, the guy from essence is no more racist than you suggesting Jolie, who I like by the way, is the perfect fit. But hey I know talking to you about anything black or minority is useless. Amused you are a moron, but even you can't deny the fact she was not white. So the guy from essence suggest a black woman, which she was not. But you say a white woman, Jolie is the perfect fit, but she was not white either. You say its afrocentric race baiting, but what is the title for your race baiting? Because she wasn't black, but she wasn't white either.
Schiff already heavily endorses Jolie, stating, "I think she'd be perfect for it and I can see a possible Oscar in her future. Physically, she's got the perfect look."
Gasp, the nerve! "She's got the perfect look?" Honestly, I don't care how full Angelina Jolie's lips are, how many African children she adopts, or how bronzed her skin will become for the film, I firmly believe this role should have gone to a Black woman. I mean, isn't it enough that 47 years ago, dame Elizabeth Taylor was cast to portray Cleopatra in one of the most expensive films ever made? That Elizabeth Taylor was actually the third White woman to be tapped for the Cleopatra role -- following Vivien Leigh and Claudette Colbert -- just makes this all the more comical.
Were Vanessa Williams, Halle Berry and Thandie Newton unavailable for auditions that day? Why does Hollywood think it's even slightly plausible to cast White women in roles that would be more sensible to cast a Black actress for? Especially when that role is an African queen.
