destrekor
Lifer
- Nov 18, 2005
- 28,799
- 359
- 126
Oooh. I just read every post here, and am absolutely rolling in a hysterical laughing fit.
Thanks all.
FWIW:
Amused, you are right.
I'm a person who sees stereotypes, but anyone who has read many of my posts here will now, I am anti-race. IMHO, skin color is like hair color. What gets people all hysterical is the apparent attack on culture, and people seeing this so-called "race-card" get thrown out at random. People need to take a step back, take a good look at what they are observing, and calm the fuck down. That isn't just for this thread or this forum, but for civilization in general.
Cultures can, will, and sometimes should, be subject to a good shakedown. Skin tone, not so much.
History is one of my favorite things. I make no effort to proclaim expertise, but I do respect and demand accurate portrayal of historical documents.
Africa is a fucking massive continent. Many tribes, some essentially gone, had black skin tone yet looked, apart from said skin tone, nothing like most modern day blacks. That's the evolution of civilization - tribes, cultures, etc... rise, or fall, and so too do their physiques.
Also of note for this thread:
For any commonly seen as accurate account of history, there exist at least a handful of accounts that claim something otherwise. Cultures rabidly swarm on historical accounts and attempt to paint them as their own, no matter the truth.
Sometimes what is commonly accepted as the truth, is far from it. Most often, the historical documentations are accurate, but a few sources will forever debate said accuracy.
Thanks all.
FWIW:
Amused, you are right.
I'm a person who sees stereotypes, but anyone who has read many of my posts here will now, I am anti-race. IMHO, skin color is like hair color. What gets people all hysterical is the apparent attack on culture, and people seeing this so-called "race-card" get thrown out at random. People need to take a step back, take a good look at what they are observing, and calm the fuck down. That isn't just for this thread or this forum, but for civilization in general.
Cultures can, will, and sometimes should, be subject to a good shakedown. Skin tone, not so much.
History is one of my favorite things. I make no effort to proclaim expertise, but I do respect and demand accurate portrayal of historical documents.
Africa is a fucking massive continent. Many tribes, some essentially gone, had black skin tone yet looked, apart from said skin tone, nothing like most modern day blacks. That's the evolution of civilization - tribes, cultures, etc... rise, or fall, and so too do their physiques.
Also of note for this thread:
For any commonly seen as accurate account of history, there exist at least a handful of accounts that claim something otherwise. Cultures rabidly swarm on historical accounts and attempt to paint them as their own, no matter the truth.
Sometimes what is commonly accepted as the truth, is far from it. Most often, the historical documentations are accurate, but a few sources will forever debate said accuracy.
