MJinZ
Diamond Member
- Nov 4, 2009
- 8,192
- 0
- 0
Halle Berry is white.*
*i still hate how being 50% anything not white makes you not white.
She looks brownish to me.
Halle Berry is white.*
*i still hate how being 50% anything not white makes you not white.
Black people are so last week ! Lets go with something else !!
Listen very closely:
Cleopatra was NOT black in any way, shape or form. She was Greek and Semitic.
Egyptians were NOT black, they were Semitic. They had, within their culture, a MINORITY of sub Saharan blacks during the later dynasties, but the main populace was light skinned.
Royalty was NEVER "tanned." It was considered low brow and only the workers were tanned. Royalty and later, upper classes throughout the ages did everything they could to stay out of the sun. It's not a debate at all: The royal families, ESPECIALLY the Greek Ptolemies, would have had pale complexions.
Portraying Cleopatra as black would be like casting Rasa Parks or Mohammad Ali with a white person. "Better fit" my ass. Essence calling for a black woman to play Cleopatra is akin to a whites only mag calling for a white man to play Ali. Both are racist, period.
The argument in Essence is just plain ignorant and you supporting it only shows your racism.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Kleopatra-VII.-Altes-Museum-Berlin1.jpg/452px-Kleopatra-VII.-Altes-Museum-Berlin1.jpg
The woman was Greek. Not a single sub-Saharan feature. Not one.
Listen very closely:
Cleopatra was NOT black in any way, shape or form. She was Greek and Semitic.
Egyptians were NOT black, they were Semitic. They had, within their culture, a MINORITY of sub Saharan blacks during the later dynasties, but the main populace was light skinned.
Royalty was NEVER "tanned." It was considered low brow and only the workers were tanned. Royalty and later, upper classes throughout the ages did everything they could to stay out of the sun. It's not a debate at all: The royal families, ESPECIALLY the Greek Ptolemies, would have had pale complexions.
Portraying Cleopatra as black would be like casting Rasa Parks or Mohammad Ali with a white person. "Better fit" my ass. Essence calling for a black woman to play Cleopatra is akin to a whites only mag calling for a white man to play Ali. Both are racist, period.
The argument in Essence is just plain ignorant and you supporting it only shows your racism.
You guys with your primtive, simplistic, essentially ignorant black and white (pun intended) answers expose yourselves as being just as retarded as the people you so eagerly wish to mock.Here's where the scholars seem to agree: Cleopatra was the last in a line of Ptolemies--Macedonian Greeks--who ruled Egypt from the death of Alexander the Great in 305 B.C. until Antony's defeat in the battle of Actium in 31 B.C. The Ptolemies, as was the custom, were an incestuous, intermarrying breed (they were concerned about preserving the royal bloodline). But they took their pleasure with the courtiers and concubines who filled their palaces. Many of the children born of these assignations were bestowed a place in the royal lineage despite their dubious--and unspoken--parentage.
Many believe that Cleopatra's father was the product of such a union--his mother may have been a concubine from Nubia or Alexandria. Lending credence to this theory is the fact that Cleopatra's bond to the people of Egypt seemed greater than those of her Ptolemic ancestors, who aligned themselves culturally and linguistically with Greece. "Far more than her predecessors, [Cleopatra] made an effort to learn Egyptian and was very savvy about presenting herself as Egyptian to the people that she ruled," says Molly Levine, a professor of Egyptology in the classics department at Howard University.
So it seems that Cleopatra may have had a true Egyptian (as opposed to Macedonian-Greek) grandmother. Does that make her "Black?" It is a question the organizers of the Field Museum's exhibit wanted to tackle head-on.
"It is a question that is nearly impossible to answer," says Ben Bronson, the museum's [Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago] curator of Asian archeology and ethnology. "What we've tried to do is narrow down the range of possibilities for her ancestry. And when you do that, you see that there is a perfectly good chance that Cleopatra was an African Egyptian. Was she 100 percent African, meaning was her skin dark? Probably not. The Romans, who wrote extensively about her, probably would have noted that. But it is quite possible--given the comings and goings of people in the Ptolemic court--that she was a mixed-race Egyptian."
Listen very closely:
Cleopatra was NOT black in any way, shape or form.
Now, if the truth makes me a "right winger" so be it. (Actually, I'm about as far from right wing as one can get) Sorry... but re-writing history is intolerable to me. Though it seems to be the norm for people like you.
Ben Bronson, the long time Curator of Asian Archaeology and Ehnology at the Field Museum of Natural History and now it's Director, whom I already quoted, has his strong doubts, but YOU, the angry, ideologically driven simpleton, YOU KNOW BETTER.This photo shows a bust of a woman thought to be Cleopatra that is in the Altes Museum in Berlin, Germany.
Here, scroll down and you can listen to this scholar on The Utility and Persistence of Paper."It is a question that is nearly impossible to answer," says Ben Bronson, the museum's [Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago] curator of Asian archeology and ethnology. "What we've tried to do is narrow down the range of possibilities for her ancestry. And when you do that, you see that there is a perfectly good chance that Cleopatra was an African Egyptian. Was she 100 percent African, meaning was her skin dark? Probably not. The Romans, who wrote extensively about her, probably would have noted that. But it is quite possible--given the comings and goings of people in the Ptolemic court--that she was a mixed-race Egyptian."
People really care about this shit?
Excuse me? Show us all ONE LINK where I have "re-written history", you red-faced blowhard.
Let's try to stick to the facts:
That bust is merely thought to be of Cleopatra, that's all:
http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/leadersaf/ss/CleopatraPix_9.htm
Ben Bronson, the long time Curator of Asian Archaeology and Ehnology at the Field Museum of Natural History and now it's Director, whom I already quoted, has his strong doubts, but YOU, the angry, ideologically driven simpleton, YOU KNOW BETTER.
Here, scroll down and you can listen to this scholar on The Utility and Persistence of Paper.
Or do you think you ALSO know more about that than he does as well?![]()
Listen very closely:
I have seen you post for over a decade and you have always been and always will be anti-african american. There is nothing in your nature that appears to be worth a damn, especially your opinion of anything that has to with a person or persons who are black.
I can't believe people are trying to recruit dead historical figures into their pathetic tribes of black and white. It's Chapelle Show's racial draft sketch come to life. It's just a matter of time before Asians claim the Wu-Tang clan.
![]()
I challenge you to post here a link to ANY post I have made that is "anti-African American."
And since Cleopatra was anything BUT black, your point is moot.
Sorry, Classy, but just because I'm not an apologist for bad behavior and self destructive cultures does NOT make me racist. I judge actions, not the color of one's skin.
I will just as readily criticize white trash as I will "gangsta" culture. I will just as readily denounce the KKK as I will afro-centric culture and rewriting of history.
I disagree. Clearly you are a racist or you would not care about Cleopatra being black or white.
I disagree. Clearly you are a racist or you would not care about Cleopatra being black or white.
Wait, so the African in African Egyptian means black?
I'd rather they just make Spiderman black.
KT
