• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

6yr old shoots teacher in Virgina.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Moonbeam said:
The argument has always been about what reasonable gun laws are. My argument is that your ideas of reasonable will work against the real thing. That makes them unreasonable. What could be stupider, for example, than banning silencers on gums used for target practice.
Click to expand...
Hugging your guns tighter than your own children
 
eelw said:
I’m sorry, if you were a reasonable gun owner, you’d be fed up with all these school shootings. You’d want to make changes to fix this singular problem only in ‘MURICA!!! It’s a lame excuse the 2nd amendment. Like I said earlier, let’s see what the Illinois assault gun ban does. Insane is just raising your hands in the air. Well the cat is out of the bag. Can’t do anything about the insane number of guns out there.
Click to expand...

If you were a self aware person perhaps you would question your certainty about what is reasonable.
 
Paratus said:
Terraforming Mars you say?
200w.gif
Click to expand...
Mars?
tumblr_onu8kdZJwK1v5nbpeo2_500.gif
 
It is hilarious how moonie acts like he’s so enlightened. Why should he need to change. Everyone one needs to make sacrifices for him to stroke his metal penis. He’s the one that needs to look in the mirror. While he isn’t a full RWNJ, he really does their playbook to a T.
 
TheVrolok said:
I find gun nutters intolerable, but honestly why not use a suppressor? Why would more hearing protection be a bad thing? Particularly for indoor ranges.
Click to expand...

does standard hearing protection not offer adequate reduction to prevent hearing damage?

I would offer that the rationale that it’s necessity for shooting at the range is 100% feels based in an attempt to ignore why they’re considered a ban worthy item in the first place
 
TheVrolok said:
I find gun nutters intolerable, but honestly why not use a suppressor? Why would more hearing protection be a bad thing? Particularly for indoor ranges.
Click to expand...

He doesn’t know what honest is because he is uninformed on the issue and, like Republicans, once intrenched in the belief that his view is sacred, in his case because of the children, he will tune out any real world common sense that challenges his self righteousness.

He doesn’t want others to suppress dangerous levels of decibels but happily suppresses the hideous indifference with which he is willing to treat others for reasons.
 
SMOGZINN said:
We do, you just decided to point out the wrong laws. We need laws about securing guns. It is my hope that the mother of this child is charged with some felony over this. It was her gross negligence that lead to this tragedy and people need to know that if they mishandle a firearm they will be held responsible for the outcome.
Click to expand...

Do you think that the Mom being prosecuted here will act as any kind of deterrent for future cases?
 
eelw said:
Yeah they should have George Floyd him instead!!!
Click to expand...

Why not just announce you are incapable of rational thought by proposing the most absurd alternative to an alert there is a child with a gun. You could maybe go with shoot all the kids in the class.

Thanks for more talk on being self aware.
 
eelw said:
Really, I have to add a sarcasm tag to a Taj reply?
Click to expand...

Your sarcasm was evident. What it failed to do, however, was to impart an iota of argument that countered the fact that if the adults at the school were in fact informed that child had a gun it is pretty incredible that it still made it into the classroom. I think that because you have a prior bias toward taj going in to anything he posts, so you reflexively and automaton-like, have to reject anything he says even if it’s that the sky is blue.
 
Moonbeam said:
I think that because you have a prior bias toward taj going in to anything he posts, so you reflexively and automaton-like, have to reject anything he says even if it’s that the sky is blue.
Click to expand...
Lol it would be a breath of fresh air if he actually posted if the sky is blue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top