HumblePie
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2000
- 14,667
- 440
- 126
One thing I don't understand is the prosecution claims Mr Wafer aimed the shotgun and shot Ms Mcbride. How could the pellets travel straight from front to back if she was shorter than Mr Wafer as well as standing several inches below the house floor level on the porch. Wouldn't the pellets have had a downward trajectory if he aimed/shot her?
He is trying to claim that she was looking up and the gun was angled at a downward plane to put it on the same level plane as her face.
Which is a huge stretch as that would require Wafer to be holding the gun about 9 feet in the air considering how far away he was standing from her. Even a small incline of the face would change the angle of that plane drastically.
Of course if she was level and the owner slipped a little, as claimed, and he brought the gun down even onto the same plane as her head while slipping, it would be a far more realistic claim. Not that I'm saying that is what happened either.
We'll just see how the evidence is presented and played out in trial.