adroc_thurston
Diamond Member
- Jul 2, 2023
- 8,767
- 11,502
- 106
it ain't, MDS1/2/3 are there.when 3nm wafer supply is going to open up.
it ain't, MDS1/2/3 are there.when 3nm wafer supply is going to open up.
Hvabehar? What does that have to do with release dates on DT etc.It's a drop-in upgrade for the existing AM5 install base.
Again, does not take AI craze into account. That is a new thing, so the past is N/A.I explained exactly how I rate rumors.
One is in line with AMD's statement and past behavior. It therefore has a higher "rating" than the other, believable rumor in line with AMD's statement but not in line with past behavior. I cannot explain it any more simply. It is rated by AMD's statements and past behavior. If you must reply to me again asking how to rate rumors I have to question if you are reading my posts at all. Stop. There is not a single question remaining about how I look at rumors.
LOL. Only until Intel releases a 52 core DTOn the upside: We should stop seeing complaints about AMD "core stagnation" for a few generations?![]()
"Smoke on the water ..... fire in the sky ..... "The question is if Zen6 DT now will be release in Q1 or Q2 2027.
Also, what happened to the dead certain trust me bro ~October 2026 predictions by some?
AMD has consistently stated their strategy is "Server First".I suspect, even if this rumor is true, Zen 6 will still launch in 2026Q4. Simply not for mere AM5 peons.
And, as usual, they are extrapolating far too much (performance, availability, potential pricing) from the server parts (which AMD actually cares about).
Yes, but the make much better margins in DC.They care about DIY very much; they own the place and will collect hearthy margins there.
They don't prioritize desktop/DIY. I agree. They prioritize DC per their own statements. This isn't to say that they don't currently enjoy a dominant position in the desktop/DIY market, because they do. It's just a decreasing market AND there is absolutely no market pressure on ZEN 5 X3D ..... so what's the hurry?The slide is in the article poke01 linked. AMD's pretty vague. Zen 6. 2026.
If that includes Olympic Ridge or not is a mystery. But I see no reason to take this rumor seriously except that I already believe AMD doesn't prioritize desktop/DIY.
I'm waiting for X3D/NVL-SK comparison so it doesn't matter.I think you rate them based on that you”d like your Zen6 in Q4 2026, so you choose the trust me bro that gives you the prediction you want to hear.![]()
But I can almost guarantee that the correct thing to do is weight rumors based on AMD's past behavior. 30 months between desktop launches would be Phenom-tier disaster from AMD. I'm not weighing DRAM shortages and AI any heavier than past behavior. It's complete speculation that it would impact their plan. Believable, but more speculative. Desktop has officially launched before server for a reason. And I doubt that reason has changed. That IOD and platform is simpler to validate.At the end of the day Venice riding the AI boom is a better opportunity than prioritizing a market that can't afford DRAM.
Do you REALLY wanna' do this?!I think you rate them based on that you”d like your Zen6 in Q4 2026
Not really, no.Yes, but the make much better margins in DC.
I'm afraid so. It is possible that this isn't a very "strong" claim in the sense that it is partially their evaluation and not based on hard data/roadmaps/leaked launch-window info - in such case their estimate may turn out to be too pessimistic, perhaps? The text is not extremely clear on which sources they base the "only in 2027" conclusion on.
The original article has a somewhat loose sense of timeI'm afraid so. It is possible that this isn't a very "strong" claim in the sense that it is partially their evaluation and not based on hard data/roadmaps/leaked launch-window info - in such case their estimate may turn out to be too pessimistic, perhaps? The text is not extremely clear on which sources they base the "only in 2027" conclusion on.
But if they actually say that based on knnowledge of internal plans, then RIP.
Benchlife started as site of the guy who had good (IIRC) hardware leaks on the late VR-Zone Chinese cca 2015 and before - the very Chris L signed under this report, I think.
So they have been around, long experience and all, plus clearly do have contacts. I think they often leaked specs of umpcoming Intel desktop/HEDT processors.
And, they posted docs about AM4 platform like year and half in advance. The docs even referred to the socket as FM3, at that point.
![]()
最快 2017 年,AMD Zen 架構導入 APU 時間要再等等 - BenchLife.info
想要看到 AMD Zen 架構出現在 APU 平台中,你可能得等到 2017 年才有機會一瞥風采。 […]benchlife.info
![]()
規格將全面翻新,AMD Summit Ridge 架構初步確定 - BenchLife.info
990FX 推出後,AMD 至今從未再更新自家晶片組,使得與 Intel 間的差距從 CPU 架構延 […]benchlife.info
![]()
AMD 平台相容性小改,Bristol Ridge 延用 Excavator 架構 - BenchLife.info
想在 2016 年看到 AMD 重返榮耀的玩家得要失望了,Zen 架構將只會出現在 Summit R […]benchlife.info
I wouldn't be surprised if the same flexibility of linear time occurs with Zen 6 DT.AMD AM5 腳位從 2023 年的 Zen 4 處理器架構開始使用。
You can be more aggressive with client launch wrt to going to market early, tuning and fixing AGESA glitches later.Accurate? Who knows.
But it is very, very believable. Why give DIY their SKUs on time if they can sell them as Epyc instead?
The original article has a somewhat loose sense of time
I wouldn't be surprised if the same flexibility of linear time occurs with Zen 6 DT.
EPYC is different packaging and different CCD.Why give DIY their SKUs on time if they can sell them as Epyc instead?
The difference being that the limiting factor between generations ISN'T the new processor design. It's the new process design.But I can almost guarantee that the correct thing to do is weight rumors based on AMD's past behavior. 30 months between desktop launches would be Phenom-tier disaster from AMD.
It would be the first time DT launches after server. Maybe the final "realization" of Zen server supremacy. They're usually shipping server parts to certain customers before its launch but now to make it official would probably be the beginning of the end of Zen dominance over DIY. Maybe not with NVL, but perhaps the part after that. I suspect NVL bLLC will be competitive with 9800X3D so to give Intel a few months of being on top in 1T, MT, and good enough in gaming would be hilarious self-sabotage. All AMD needs is a paper launch to avoid 90 "Intel is back" reviews.So launching both lines together at CES wouldn't really change much...
Some thoughts:It would be the first time DT launches after server. Maybe the final "realization" of Zen server supremacy. They're usually shipping server parts to certain customers before its launch but now to make it official would probably be the beginning of the end of Zen for DIY. Maybe not with NVL, but perhaps the part after that. I suspect NVL bLLC will be competitive with 9800X3D so to give Intel a few months of being on top in 1T, MT, and good enough in gaming would be hilarious. All AMD needs is a paper launch to avoid 90 "Intel is back" reviews.
Huh? Zen 6 does not seem to be a big bump - it is more like in Intel's territory of ~10% IPC.AMD (and ZEN 6) is going to be the last of the big bumps IMO. Transistor density improvements for N2 class GAA is going to go slow for quite some time (until High NA Lithography starts being used) IMO.
AMD is going to have to settle in for the long haul on the Zen 6 class architecture IMO. I am not expecting Zen 7 anytime soon, nor do I expect the same level of change from 6-7 as we should see from 5-6.
They're not really way more different.Our resident "+40IPC person" repeatedly mentions desktop and server chips being way more different than in previous gens.
AMD never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
A14 is a very good node and also an SRAM bitcell shrink. wtaf are you about.AMD (and ZEN 6) is going to be the last of the big bumps IMO. Transistor density improvements for N2 class GAA is going to go slow for quite some time (until High NA Lithography starts being used) IMO.
Zen7 is q3'28.AMD is going to have to settle in for the long haul on the Zen 6 class architecture IMO. I am not expecting Zen 7 anytime soon, nor do I expect the same level of change from 6-7 as we should see from 5-6.
xtor budgets matter primarily for GPUs.Additionally, due to the GREATLY reduced speed at which transistor density is improving, each new CPU architecture is more of a tweak than a redesign as they essentially only have 15-20% more transistor budget even AFTER 4 years of process improvements.
that would be a catastrophe.I suspect NVL bLLC will be competitive with 9800X3D
Something Zen 6 should officially launch this year. Server is 99%. But I posit AMD won't change their process despite this one article claiming Zen 4 launched in 2023 also saying Zen 6 will launch in 2027.As you said, server launches means very little since hyperscalers and OEMs have the chips available in advance of any official shiny launch presentation.
I think it's comparable to Zen 5. Separate CCDs but AMD put them in specific Granite Ridge SKUs anyway. Whatever differences there are don't seem to be that important.Our resident "+40IPC person" repeatedly mentions desktop and server chips being way more different than in previous gens.
But we're pretty confident that isn't the case this time. But we're 5.5 out of 5 Zens officially launching on DT before server. Again, probably due to validation.Order is not given as the last gen was the first gen launching mobile SKUs first.
It just goes in the TO order generally.Again, probably due to validation.
cast doubt on people saying delay because AI + DDR.Hvabehar? What does that have to do with release dates on DT etc.
I wonder if AMD is going to run into supply issues in 2027 in regards to 2nm wafers.
i would assume many other supply chain issues before wafers , packaging , HBM etcOnly if the AI customers all decide to abandon NVidia and switch to AMD Mi450.
The supply chain for those racks is extremely complex.Only if the AI customers all decide to abandon NVidia and switch to AMD Mi450.
We know the first wave of Zen 6 mobile SKUs launches in Jan 2027 at CES. Then rumors put DT Zen 6 to Oct 2026. So launching both lines together at CES wouldn't really change much...
wut?It would be like a replay of disastrous rollout of 5800x3d, releasing it first as Milan-X, which no one was even expecting, and postponing desktop 3-4 months, handing Intel undisputed performance leadership during that period.
It was a mistake results of which that took 2-4 years to overcome.
Will AMD repeat it? Certainly possible.
