luro
Member
Oh, I thought it was on 18A for some reasonIt's N3-ish stuff versus the N7 VGH.
Oh, I thought it was on 18A for some reasonIt's N3-ish stuff versus the N7 VGH.
18A is very much an N3 class node.Oh, I thought it was on 18A for some reason
The B370/B390 die is straight up manufactured on N3E.18A is very much an N3 class node.
A hair slower/less efficient than N3e.
NoThe B370/B390 die is straight up manufactured on N3E.
The Steam Deck still outperforms Strix and Phoenix / Hawk at 10W.You do understand that the thingy there is like 2 nodes ahead?
I'm not even talking 50mm^2 of GFX area alone.
Yeah.
It doesn't.The Steam Deck still outperforms Strix and Phoenix / Hawk at 10W.
Point being Intel's iGPU scales down for lower budgets just fine.
I stand corrected
I once wrote a small sample in asm, then C and ran them against each other. The C was FASTER than the ASM. When I disassembled it, I found that the C compiler used the registers better than I did. I quit writing ASM for anything other than inline C functions for very very specific usage after that 🙂.I don't write assembly anymore, intrinsics made that a thing of the past, but I do look at the disassembly of my code. You can basically write assembly level code with tight c/c++.
Let's say 10% conservatively. On top of that, I hear the latest leaks are that clock speeds will top out at ~6.4Ghz (12%). I think the bigger effect (and likely not measured well by SPEC) will be the improved memory controller, faster memory, and larger L3 cache impacts that aren't necessarily "IPC"9% is not that much. But do you know if Zen 6 is better than 9%?
Those are hardly relevant outside of nT loads.will be the improved memory controller, faster memory, and larger L3 cache impacts that aren't necessarily "IPC"
Great now we are at a point where people are saying new ISA extensions can be delivered via microcode updates.
CPU Micro transaction?
CPU Micro transaction?
lmao![]()
Intel Finally Reveals its Software Defined Silicon as Intel On Demand
Back in September 2021, reports about Intel working on something called SDSi or software defined silicon, started to appear. Now, over a year later, the company has finally launched its SDSi products under the Intel On Demand branding. Back then, we speculated about what features Intel would put...www.techpowerup.com
Intel will get Nvidia iGPUs soon - Nvidia will certainly be open to get into x86 handheld console market, they did it cut price for Nintendo who must be the cheapest company on this planet.These two sentences are mutually exclusive. If Valve is cheap, they're not going with Nvidia.
Yeah.
It doesn't.
Again, 2 shrinks, a ton more area and on average like 30% faster.
Embarassing.
Those weren't made for that.At 10W in gaming workloads, Hawk and Strix Point are also embarassing compared to Van Gogh considering their node generations as well
A lot less, but that's hardly relevant.At 20-30W, Intel's Xe3 is surpassing RDNA 3/3.5 by 50 to 80%
Cut price on a 2 yr old SoC that was already outdated by the time it was announced the first time, let alone by the time it was announced for Switch and then released.Intel will get Nvidia iGPUs soon - Nvidia will certainly be open to get into x86 handheld console market, they did it cut price for Nintendo who must be the cheapest company on this planet.
None of them, AMD nor Intel, were designed for gaming workloads at 10W.Those weren't made for that.
Alas, LNL and PTL both were.
It's very relevant considering the fact that, like you keep saying, AMD doesn't care.A lot less, but that's hardly relevant.
LNL was!None of them, AMD nor Intel, were designed for gaming workloads at 10W.
No, it was made for a meme Win10X tablet.Van Gogh OTOH does seem to be much more gaming-oriented, or at least much better balanced for gaming (only 4 CPU cores with big 8CU GPU, large GPU L2 per-CU, large RAM bandwidth per-CU, etc.).
?It's very relevant considering the fact that, like you keep saying, AMD doesn't care.