- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,786
- 136
Single CCD Strix Halo doesn't exist, and probably never will. If someone wants to pay for the design ala MS/Sony and have the chips fabbed separately then so be it. Thus far nobody seems to be lining up to do so. AMD isn't going to carry another SKU in hopes that people will use it in handhelds.At the very least, Strix Halo in a handheld should be single CCD, dual is pointless.
What? It's a 2 CCD design. They just omit one of the CCDs.Single CCD Strix Halo doesn't exist, and probably never will. If someone wants to pay for the design ala MS/Sony and have the chips fabbed separately then so be it. Thus far nobody seems to be lining up to do so. AMD isn't going to carry another SKU in hopes that people will use it in handhelds.
There is one, with 32CUs instead of 40.Single CCD Strix Halo doesn't exist,
Yeah, it does >2x here at ~45-50W and these game settings, but the entire dynamic changes as you go up or down in power levels and resolutions. e.g. @ 15W I doubt Halo would have much of an advantage, if any. @4K, Halo might do more than 3x Point due to mem bottlenecks on Point, etc.
it all depends on voltage , if there is little voltage difference between 50watt and 20watt sure. but if those CU's can run at low voltage you will be well wrong.Yeah, it does >2x here at ~45-50W and these game settings, but the entire dynamic changes as you go up or down in power levels and resolutions. e.g. @ 15W I doubt Halo would have much of an advantage, if any. @4K, Halo might do more than 3x Point due to mem bottlenecks on Point, etc.
Thats my point about Switch 2. That thing almost certainly operates sub 10W (maybe significantly less) in hh mode, yet by most accounts can produce some pretty kick-ass visuals considering that.
It all comes down to the targeted power envelopes /sweet spots for each SOC.
What? It's a 2 CCD design. They just omit one of the CCDs.
Yeah that doesn't have the full iGPU so it's not really applicable to the discussion. Yes it's technically Strix Halo, but . . .There is one, with 32CUs instead of 40.
![]()
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 Processor - Benchmarks and Specs
Benchmarks, information, and specifications for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385www.notebookcheck.net
it all depends on voltage , if there is little voltage difference between 50watt and 20watt sure. but if those CU's can run at low voltage you will be well wrong.
it all depends on voltage , if there is little voltage difference between 50watt and 20watt sure. but if those CU's can run at low voltage you will be well wrong.
Power scaling :Yeah, it does >2x here at ~45-50W and these game settings, but the entire dynamic changes as you go up or down in power levels and resolutions. e.g. @ 15W I doubt Halo would have much of an advantage, if any. @4K, Halo might do more than 3x Point due to mem bottlenecks on Point, etc.
Thats my point about Switch 2. That thing almost certainly operates sub 10W (maybe significantly less) in hh mode, yet by most accounts can produce some pretty kick-ass visuals considering that.
It all comes down to the targeted power envelopes /sweet spots for each SOC.
Dont know anyone who seriously use ryzen master as its a resource drain on your system, and half of the time it don't even work properly
@Det0x Have you found anything interesting in this version?
Thats weird, I've never had issues with ryzen master across several builds.Dont know anyone who seriously use ryzen master as its a resource drain on your system, and half of the time it don't even work properly
Would much rather recommend something like ryzen debugtool as a much lighter and better application for Zen overclocking
Its made from the same auther as Zentimings
Asus "worktool" is also a good option if your rocking a asus motherboard
32 CUs is not that much less, so much that there s a STH 385 variant of this handeld.Yeah that doesn't have the full iGPU so it's not really applicable to the discussion. Yes it's technically Strix Halo, but . . .
That's still a relatively poor compromise for a gaming handheld that's so heavily biased towards CPU performance. Compare the resource balance to something like the PS4 or 5 for example. Or really any purpose-built AMD chipset for consoles.32 CUs is not that much less, so much that there s a STH 385 variant of this handeld.
Same. There is zero reason to use it instead of just going into the BIOS. Its not as reliable and requires reboots anyway.Dont know anyone who seriously use ryzen master as its a resource drain on your system, and half of the time it don't even work properly
Would much rather recommend something like ryzen debugtool as a much lighter and better application for Zen overclocking
Its made from the same auther as Zentimings
Asus "worktool" is also a good option if your rocking a asus motherboard
Not my experience. If you mess something up with Ryzen Master, you can usually get into the BIOS to boot with default settings. But mess something up in BIOS and it's CMOS reset time which is way more annoying. I enjoyed using Ryzen Master because of this. Intel seems to have gone the other way with their latest XTU. You can make your system unbootable with XTU and then require a CMOS reset to boot.Same. There is zero reason to use it instead of just going into the BIOS.
For people with big hands, YEAH.Is that even a handheld?
Well, you hold it in hand ...Is that even a handheld?