- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,778
- 136
Was an optimization to try reducing IF bandwidth bottleneck.Has it been made clear what was the actual cause of this?
I think either the existing SKUs are selling too well or not at all.Still no EPYC 8005 leaks????? ;-)
Seriously though, are they going to skip this one = double the cadence for "edge" and telco?
It can beat 9950X in some benchmarks.still no halo leaks?????
is it safe to assume some 10-20% less perf than 9950X or will it be unique because better memory bandwidth etc??
iGPU benchmarks, for sure.It can beat 9950X in some benchmarks.
It's gonna have oodles more memory bandwidth...iGPU benchmarks, for sure.![]()
The Halo series will stay. The future regarding laptop SoCs is big iGPUs and access to lots of VRAM and loads of bandwidth, which will only get better with LPDDR6.
Strix Halo has some issues that will be rectified with Medusa Halo but over all Intel has nothing to combat it next year.
Maybe people are starting to see the light?
What issues are they, do you think?The Halo series will stay. The future regarding laptop SoCs is big iGPUs and access to lots of VRAM and loads of bandwidth, which will only get better with LPDDR6.
Strix Halo has some issues that will be rectified with Medusa Halo but over all Intel has nothing to combat it next year.
Mainly with the iGPU and memory controllerWhat issues are they, do you think?
still no halo leaks?????
Not supporting the "leak", but it could be a trash bin for chips with one or more of several defects. Defective memory controller, GPU, IF cache, etc. Any one of those could prevent it selling as a top 2 SKU. Everything else gets pushed to that 128 bit bus low spec model, which also works with AM5.MLID actually "leaked" a supposed Halo Low Power that, to be honest, doesn't make much sense.
If it's an unheard before monolithic chip then those 105W TDP make no sense. There's no way the extra 4 CUs and 16MB IF would push power consumption that far.
If it's a cut-down Halo IOD + 1x Zen5 CCD then it doesn't make sense either, as they're disabling like half the IOD or more.
The RTX 3050 Max-Q as target also seems like such a low bar. Strix Point already competes with that in many games. Why would they make such a chip with such a modest iGPU performance upgrade over Strix Point but with a giant leap in power consumption?
If it's an unheard before monolithic chip then those 105W TDP make no sense. There's no way the extra 4 CUs and 16MB IF would push power consumption that far.
If it's a cut-down Halo IOD + 1x Zen5 CCD then it doesn't make sense either, as they're disabling like half the IOD or more.
It can beat 9950X in some benchmarks.
That's not the segment halo targets.but knowing AMD it's possible we get stuck with some ASUS zephyrusduo $5000 minimum for 6+ months![]()
Which segment, then?That's not the segment halo targets.
You get thick MacBook types instead. Modern MBPs are pretty chungus alright.Thin macbook types won't dissipate ~150watts right
various 100W TBP premium™ devices.Which segment, then?
Blue line is previous best runQuestion about Dawntrail benchmark. What do the blue and green lines signify? I noticed they are quite separated on my 9900X system, and they are joined or closer on other runs Ive seen, including with the 5900X run I did at the bottom?
View attachment 112331