Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
Do you not GET the fact that they are Christian and Chinese from a country where BEING EITHER can be a death sentence? That an appeals court just chastised the BIA for denying a similar appeal?Edit: Just saw the second link. The were ordered deported nine years ago, and decided to stay despite the order.
What's fucked up here is the process taking so long. Who can put their life on hold for twenty years? It should have been adjudicated in one year. The matter could have been settled and the people could have moved on with their lives. They should be allowed to stay simply because INS couldn't get it's act together.
The Court of Appeals ruling, written by Judge (and former Pennsylvania First Lady) Marjorie Rendell, and handed down in April – on Good Friday, no less – chastised the BIA for “an abuse of discretion” by essentially ignoring reams of documentation and evidence presented by the petitioner backing his claim that conditions for Christians in his homeland had deteriorated.
“Because the BIA did not explain its conclusion and did not meaningfully consider much of the evidence presented by Liem, we will grant his petition for review, vacate the denial of his second motion to reopen, and remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,” the decision said.
Im pretty sure the legal system would and does exactly that. If the government is so inept that they are not able to do or decide things in a reasonable time frame they dont get a say. If the government could just throw you in jail for the next 20 years while they decide what your guilty of you would have the legal system of most dictatorships.So if it takes 20 years to convict a rapist should we set him free just because it took a while for the trial to complete?
Seems like a war on Christianity to me.Here are some more facts about their situation I found. I would like to know if this info makes you reconsider your reflexively heartless zenophobia.
They are ethnic Chinese and Christian and were living in a country where both groups were major targets during deadly riots in 1998 set off by the nation’s economic collapse under the strongman Suharto.
“Bad things were happening,” said Sinta Penyami Storms, who runs an Indonesian dance studio in South Philadelphia and is herself an immigrant. Food was scarce and unemployment was high.
“It was unsafe for them to go out. There was a lot of robbery of houses, and rapes of Chinese Indonesians,” Storms said. More than 300 people were killed in the unrest.
The couple is Catholic; Indonesia is majority Muslim, and although it is not a religious state, there is discrimination against Christians. “It’s hard to go to church, your church can’t get a permit to have a house of worship. They’re a double minority,” Storms said.
[...]
Indonesians are particularly vulnerable to deportation orders because, despite the continued harassment and sometime violence in their country against ethnic Chinese and Christians, many of them have been denied asylum.
But even now, those rejected can have their cases reconsidered if they can demonstrate that circumstances in their home country have significantly worsened since they originally filed their petition.
An Indonesian Christian man recently did that, Casazza said, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order that the Bureau of Immigration Affairs (BIA) take his petition seriously. This ruling provides hope for his clients, Casazza said; three days after the Philadelphia couple was detained, he filed petitions on their behalf to reopen their case “on the grounds that there are changes in the circumstances in their home country regarding the treatment of Christians.”
The Court of Appeals ruling, written by Judge (and former Pennsylvania First Lady) Marjorie Rendell, and handed down in April – on Good Friday, no less – chastised the BIA for “an abuse of discretion” by essentially ignoring reams of documentation and evidence presented by the petitioner backing his claim that conditions for Christians in his homeland had deteriorated.
“Because the BIA did not explain its conclusion and did not meaningfully consider much of the evidence presented by Liem, we will grant his petition for review, vacate the denial of his second motion to reopen, and remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,” the decision said.
^^^ Theirs was and remains a textbook case for political asylum. Don't be an all too eager lapdog for a cruelly unAmerican system.
Do you not GET the fact that they are Christian and Chinese from a country where BEING EITHER can be a death sentence? That an appeals court just chastised the BIA for denying a similar appeal?
I swear you, and other Make America White Again sympathizers here, routinely -- la di da da -- turn a blind eye to the despicable rot in our legal bureaucracies.
Christians? None of them look like Pence! Black/brown and foreign Christians do not deserve the same support, unless they're promoting lethal homophobia. Remember, we don't give a fuck about dusky types, unless they're Israeli Jews shitting on the Palestinians. Got it? It's nuance done FudiePublican style!Seems like a war on Christianity to me.
Their ability to appeal should be forever revoked as they ignored a deportation order. The quicker they’re deported the better.
Story is very sparse on details. Why is it taking 20 to resolve the case? Why were the couple picked up by ICE? What event's lead up to their arrest?
This could be government agents overstepping their bounds, it could be racism, or it could be the result of a legal and expected court order.
This was an event, a single segment in a 20 year saga. I'd like to know the rest of the story.
I get the facts. I didn't decide they couldn't stay. I observed that they had been ordered out nine years ago. Nine years, do you recall who was president at that time? It wasn't the make America white again crew. Someone way back then decided their case didn't meet the requirements for asylum, and ordered them deported. They decided to ignore that order.Do you not GET the fact that they are Christian and Chinese from a country where BEING EITHER can be a death sentence? That an appeals court just chastised the BIA for denying a similar appeal?
I swear you, and other Make America White Again sympathizers here, routinely -- la di da da -- turn a blind eye to the despicable rot in our legal bureaucracies.
Read my second post. I thought I hit the edit button, but I ended up quoting myself. I agreed with you Skippy, they should be allowed to stay.No.
The story parameters are as given. Now make a choice.
Or dont. Cause that is what you are doing anyway.
I dont like the story so I keep asking more questions until the answers stop coming and I can just forget about it anyway. Tug my self in at night and tell myself I am good boy.
Not having to face an uncomfortable truth about myself, ever.
Good job.
The deportation order ignored clearly documented oppression unto lethality against Christians and Chinese. They were both. It was a flawed order, to put it mildly. The BIA has a documented history of ignoring valid claims of asylum put forth by those few Indonesian Christians who make it here, because reasons.Their ability to appeal should be forever revoked as they ignored a deportation order. The quicker they’re deported the better.
I hope someday before you die you learn what empathy is.
The deportation order ignored clearly documented oppression unto lethality against Christians and Chinese. They were both. It was a flawed order, to put it mildly. The BIA has a documented history of ignoring valid claims of asylum put forth by those few Indonesian Christians who make it here, because reasons.
But, hey, the deportation order was an ORDER! Never mind Nuremberg, supporting it is just you FOLLOWING ORDERS, nicht wahr?
The deportation order ignored clearly documented oppression unto lethality against Christians and Chinese. They were both. It was a flawed order, to put it mildly. The BIA has a documented history of ignoring valid claims of asylum put forth by those few Indonesian Christians who make it here, because reasons.
But, hey, the deportation order was an ORDER! Never mind Nuremberg, supporting it is just you FOLLOWING ORDERS, nicht wahr?
Due process? It was a kangaroo BIA court ignoring the fully documented validity of their petition for asylum, which they have continued to do to other Indonesian Christians down unto today. Due process, my ass. Not all "authority" is moral or correct. We told the Nazis that at Nuremberg.Your side ignores the rule of law and that due process occurred...
Due process? It was a kangaroo BIA court ignoring the fully documented validity of their petition for asylum, which they have continued to do to other Indonesian Christians down unto today. Due process, my ass. Not all "authority" is moral or correct. We told the Nazis that at Nuremberg.
Big boy pants eh? Cant shoot em in the street so open the border wide open. Cause what other options could possibly exist?The didn’t ignore it, they found it not compelling. I get it you don’t even care about due process and just want to get to your predetermined result. It’s why I say let’s stop the charade and just go open border.
The didn’t ignore it, they found it not compelling. I get it you don’t even care about due process and just want to get to your predetermined result. It’s why I say let’s stop the charade and just go open border.
Your side ignores the rule of law and that due process occurred, then acts surprised as “xenophobia” rises. Honestly if the people in your story ignored orders to leave then I really care for government ignores orders they should be allow to appeal again either. Deport them.
This isn't about current immigration at all. It's the legacy of the past. It's about a large number of people we let in long ago. It's about American citizen children, too. It's about being decent human beings. It's about acknowledging that they're already part of this great country.
And, having lost any claim to logic, you jump straight to the open borders straw man.The didn’t ignore it, they found it not compelling. I get it you don’t even care about due process and just want to get to your predetermined result. It’s why I say let’s stop the charade and just go open border.
Even if this were true, why should we be eager to deport people who have lived in our country for 10-20 years as law-abiding citizens? If these people were criminals, or perpetually lived off the system, I would agree that deportation would be the correct choice. But from all accounts, that is not the case. So why don't we want the borders open to these kind of people?It’s about you trying to stall and after 10-20 years saying “even though they were ordered deported a decade ago, we can’t deport them now, they’ve been here too long.” It’s open borders by run out the clock methods.
Even if this were true, why should we be eager to deport people who have lived in our country for 10-20 years as law-abiding citizens? If these people were criminals, or perpetually lived off the system, I would agree that deportation would be the correct choice. But from all accounts, that is not the case. So why don't we want the borders open to these kind of people?
