• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

White? Dont teach here. Op Updated to address false 'racist' labal

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
dank69 said:
Okay, so we have established that this extension of the protesters' logic is something Waggy used to prove to himself that the protesters' logic is incorrect. (Yes/No)
Click to expand...

Sure. Yes. Don't really know about waggy proving things to himself.
 
Florida is a giant swamp with some dry patches here and there. I drove down to Orlando from Georgia and on both sides of the highway was a swamp. There are some nice bits here and there if you can dodge the alligators and the giant snakes, i.e. Burmese Pythons.
 
justoh said:
Sure. Yes. Don't really know about waggy proving things to himself.
Click to expand...
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
 
dank69 said:
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
Click to expand...

no. Validity of the protest is subjective, and not objective.
 
dank69 said:
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
Click to expand...

Yes
 
realibrad said:
no. Validity of the protest is subjective, and not objective.
Click to expand...
Even if I stipulate that the validity of this specific protest is subjective, which I don't, the validity can still be objectively tested to see if it is at least logical. That is what we are concerned with here.
 
justoh said:
Yes
Click to expand...
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.

Now we can move on to the actual logic.

Spungo started the extension of logic that Waggy adopted. Do you agree? (Yes/No)
 
dank69 said:
Good for you. Please detail the process you had to go through to convince your government to allow you to vote.
Click to expand...

Wait. So because Doc made a comment, and the context of your conversation was about the barriers of minorities to vote, my comment about me being a minority must be connected?

So, kinda like how waggy made a comment, in context to Spugo and his comments being in that context?
 
dank69 said:
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.

Now we can move on to the actual logic.

Spungo started the extension of logic that Waggy adopted. Do you agree? (Yes/No)
Click to expand...

yes. and we could have skipped all of these questions since they aren't pertinent.
 
realibrad said:
Wait. So because Doc made a comment, and the context of your conversation was about the barriers of minorities to vote, my comment about me being a minority must be connected?
Click to expand...
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.


So, kinda like how waggy made a comment, in context to Spugo and his comments being in that context?
Click to expand...
Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?
 
dank69 said:
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.


Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?
Click to expand...

Can't really say much about the "protestors' logic," whatever that means.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top