White? Dont teach here. Op Updated to address false 'racist' labal

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
Okay, so we have established that this extension of the protesters' logic is something Waggy used to prove to himself that the protesters' logic is incorrect. (Yes/No)

Sure. Yes. Don't really know about waggy proving things to himself.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Florida is a giant swamp with some dry patches here and there. I drove down to Orlando from Georgia and on both sides of the highway was a swamp. There are some nice bits here and there if you can dodge the alligators and the giant snakes, i.e. Burmese Pythons.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,352
32,980
136
Sure. Yes. Don't really know about waggy proving things to himself.
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)

no. Validity of the protest is subjective, and not objective.
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.

Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)

Yes
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,352
32,980
136
no. Validity of the protest is subjective, and not objective.
Even if I stipulate that the validity of this specific protest is subjective, which I don't, the validity can still be objectively tested to see if it is at least logical. That is what we are concerned with here.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,352
32,980
136
Deliberate...Yes. Oversight...No.
Okay, so you grew up in the US with the rest of us but somehow your childhood was so different from every other white person in the US that you are now qualified to speak as though you were a minority?
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,352
32,980
136
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.

Now we can move on to the actual logic.

Spungo started the extension of logic that Waggy adopted. Do you agree? (Yes/No)
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Good for you. Please detail the process you had to go through to convince your government to allow you to vote.

Wait. So because Doc made a comment, and the context of your conversation was about the barriers of minorities to vote, my comment about me being a minority must be connected?

So, kinda like how waggy made a comment, in context to Spugo and his comments being in that context?
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,151
108
106
Good for you. Please detail the process you had to go through to convince your government to allow you to vote.

Wait...I'm black, and I never had to personally fight for my right to vote...am I still a minority?
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.

Now we can move on to the actual logic.

Spungo started the extension of logic that Waggy adopted. Do you agree? (Yes/No)

yes. and we could have skipped all of these questions since they aren't pertinent.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,352
32,980
136
Wait. So because Doc made a comment, and the context of your conversation was about the barriers of minorities to vote, my comment about me being a minority must be connected?
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.


So, kinda like how waggy made a comment, in context to Spugo and his comments being in that context?
Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.


Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?

Can't really say much about the "protestors' logic," whatever that means.