dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 37,352
- 32,980
- 136
Okay, so we have established that this extension of the protesters' logic is something Waggy used to prove to himself that the protesters' logic is incorrect. (Yes/No)Yes.
Okay, so we have established that this extension of the protesters' logic is something Waggy used to prove to himself that the protesters' logic is incorrect. (Yes/No)Yes.
Okay, so we have established that this extension of the protesters' logic is something Waggy used to prove to himself that the protesters' logic is incorrect. (Yes/No)
I beginning to think justoh is one of the biggest trolls we've seen on this forum for quite some time.
Because I like it.
They're very similar quotes...what bothers you about the one I prefer? BTW...nice trolling!oh. well why did you ask me if the other one was better then?
They're very similar quotes...what bothers you about the one I prefer? BTW...nice trolling!
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.Sure. Yes. Don't really know about waggy proving things to himself.
Speaking of trolls, you forgot to tell us if you grew up in the US. Was that a deliberate oversight?I beginning to think justoh is one of the biggest trolls we've seen on this forum for quite some time.
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.
Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
Just talking about our internal rationalizations, we all do it.
Anyway, hopefully last question before we get into dissecting the extension logic. If the extension was used to support the conclusion that the protesters are wrong, I think we can conclude that the purpose of the extension was exactly that: to help test the validity of the protesters' logic. Would you agree? (Yes/No)
Deliberate...Yes. Oversight...No.Speaking of trolls, you forgot to tell us if you grew up in the US. Was that a deliberate oversight?
Even if I stipulate that the validity of this specific protest is subjective, which I don't, the validity can still be objectively tested to see if it is at least logical. That is what we are concerned with here.no. Validity of the protest is subjective, and not objective.
Okay, so you grew up in the US with the rest of us but somehow your childhood was so different from every other white person in the US that you are now qualified to speak as though you were a minority?Deliberate...Yes. Oversight...No.
Okay, so you grew up in the US with the rest of us but somehow your childhood was so different from every other white person in the US that you are now qualified to speak as though you were a minority?
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.
Good for you. Please detail the process you had to go through to convince your government to allow you to vote.
Good for you. Please detail the process you had to go through to convince your government to allow you to vote.
Wait...I'm black, and I never had to personally fight for my right to vote...am I still a minority?
Great. Just so you know we could have skipped everything from post 270 to this point if you had just answered yes to post 269. Perhaps I worded it poorly or perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by intent but that is neither here nor there.
Now we can move on to the actual logic.
Spungo started the extension of logic that Waggy adopted. Do you agree? (Yes/No)
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.Wait. So because Doc made a comment, and the context of your conversation was about the barriers of minorities to vote, my comment about me being a minority must be connected?
Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?So, kinda like how waggy made a comment, in context to Spugo and his comments being in that context?
If they are not connected, I apologize for not being able to determine that you posted your comment for no reason when it appeared from the context that you were posting it to support Doc.
Nice try, but we have well established the context of Waggy's post. Are you still operating under some illusion that Waggy's and Spungo's posts were not extending the protesters' logic?