What is NVIDIA equivalent to Radeon 7850?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ocre

Golden Member
Dec 26, 2008
1,594
7
81
what are you guys talking about????

Topic?

The OP:

What is NVIDIA equivalent to Radeon 7850 or 6950?

Any last generation cards a nice bank for the buck? (570, 448 cores, etc)

I love catching last generation cards at a bargain. :)

so to this rather specific question the, the 560ti 448core.....but i wait at least a *few more days* until the 660ti comes out to see what effect it could have on the market. It really couldnt hurt to at least see what kepler brings to the midrange. And also i think we should see the older generation drop prices after the 660ti. So, wait a few more days.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
perfrel_1920.gif


Stock vs stock. Now whats the average OC % for 470s vs 7850??

fJLhq.gif


FAIL harder please.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
What's funny is a card that costs less than half, has comparable performance at stock, and has as much if not more OC headroom is considered fail based on your idea of power mattering more than any of the aforementioned criteria's.

:)

I'd say the 470 is a close match based on performance and overclocking, however it loses badly at perf/w but smokes the 7850 in perf/$.
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
Try harder? You're the one in disbelief, not me.

I find it funny how quickly the points of arguements switch around around here with you guys.

Which is it, power, overclocking, or price? Or does it change based on which product we're talking about at your convenience, ergo 7970 vs 670/680?

You seem to be as confused as anyone else.

Wait a second, Balla, my brain is about to explode trying to process the following:

7970s somewhat higher wattage draw is a huuuuge negative


Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared
AMD is topping the charts, in noise and power consumption.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=33694356&highlight=#post33694356

+

Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared

I'd say overall, at stock:

570>480>448>7850=6950>560Ti
 

zaydq

Senior member
Jul 8, 2012
782
0
0
7850s are great cards. Like others have suggested, wait to see the 660ti(i know ref models are coming out @ $300) it could make the market prices shift down. If you go for the 7850, avoid gigabyte's model as they dont OC at all (had one).
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
lol @ 470 penta-SLI trolling every chance he gets :rolleyes:

lol haters gonna hate.

OP asked for Nvidia equivalent, not another praise be to gawd 7850 thread.

Nvidia has had a comparable card to the 7850 performance wise out since mid 2010.

224cf01d.png


908 core, 1818 shader, 4000MHz memory, on reference air, if only it was AMD then it would be praise worthy two years later at the $250 price point.

A 50% overclock, on reference, blower style air.

2441a713.jpg


The kicker here is, that board, the cpu, and the gpu cost $130 total, you can't even buy a 7870 for that price. Let alone add in the second $90 470 to the left for SLI, good golly talk about getting stomped for the same price I get SLI a cpu and a board. I said it was over-priced, I meant it was over-priced.
 
Last edited:

Atreidin

Senior member
Mar 31, 2011
464
27
86
Holy crap I was outside today and some random guy opened up a trenchcoat and he had 470s for $50 each. However I know that is still insanely expensive so I knew to wait. As luck would have it, I happened upon an insane hobo who traded me a 6970 in exchange for a handful of peach pits. It completely escapes my comprehension how everyone else on the planet doesn't take advantage of these deals. Must be stupid or lazy. Either way my setup has an awesome price/perf ratio.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,991
627
126
lol @ 470 penta-SLI trolling every chance he gets :rolleyes:
It's truly ridiculous, I don't understand it at all. o_O The 470 is about the worst product Nvidia has ever made, not THE worst but right up there, it's horribly inefficient. Why would anyone extol the virtues of it escapes me. :confused:

Such a thing either comes from outright trolling, or disillusionment.
 

Skurge

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2009
5,195
1
71
I got my 6990 for close to nothing. U$60.

Who cares that it uses 400W of power. (probably the same as that 470 at 900mhz) OP should get one.

Derailed like a boss.
 
Last edited:

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,991
627
126
Holy crap I was outside today and some random guy opened up a trenchcoat and he had 470s for $50 each. However I know that is still insanely expensive so I knew to wait. As luck would have it, I happened upon an insane hobo who traded me a 6970 in exchange for a handful of peach pits. It completely escapes my comprehension how everyone else on the planet doesn't take advantage of these deals. Must be stupid or lazy. Either way my setup has an awesome price/perf ratio.
Congrats on your purchase. :thumbsup:

He didn't happen to be selling his liver, because I'm in kind of a bind here....
 

Artista

Senior member
Jan 7, 2011
768
1
0
I had a good laugh after reading the replies. Its like Gators vs Seminoles here.:D

There seem to be a few good suggestions.:sneaky:

Perhaps I will wait a few days. Video cards are like the stock market and used car market combined. So many factors make the prices go up and down in the new and used markets.
 
Last edited:

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Sorry did you miss 2010 onward when AMD wasn't overclocking well?

Not entirely true. HD5850 was a very good overclocker and for $270 undercut the GTX470 substantially, plus it came out 6 months earlier. Not trying to knock the 470 since I had 3 of them but then AMD stomped all over the GTX580 in price/performance. A single $250 6950 @ 6970 speeds ended up just 9-13% slower than a $500 GTX580 when the dust settled. Not sure where you've been but AMD took the price/performance with 4870/4890/5850/5870/6950 and this generation has reclaimed the price/performance and top performance at the same time. While GTX470 may be just $40, with bitcoin mining HD7900 series is free.

Using your own assessment that power consumption doesn't matter, overclocked performance is very important and acquiring a fast card for as cheap as possible is the ultimate goal, then you should have 2-3 HD7970s by now. Since January 9th, all 3 of them would have paid for themselves fully by now. :thumbsup:

What is NVIDIA equivalent to Radeon 7850 or 6950?

Most likely GTX650/660 non-Ti, expected in September. I wouldn't buy any of 560Ti 448/570/580 over a 7850.
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
bitcoin mining HD7900 series is free


I'd rather use my video card to cure cancer.

lol at the rest of your post.

I would have 2-3 7970s if they weren't 5-6 times more expensive and require another huge up front cost to power them to mine on them for over a year before getting a return on my investment in the form of buying other stuff that I may or may not have needed.

It's funny the insanely power hungry 7970 is touted by the AMD bois because it's faster than Nvidia's 28nm mid-range card. Is that praise worthy? Seems trifle to me, just like this 7850 rave this forum of bois is in. It's nothing new as I've just shown in this thread, Nvidia has had similar cards that did just as well. Overclocked further, to a higher degree of percentage, offered performance we're seeing now, at a lower price point over a year and half ago.

Forum doesn't like 470s, first it was because I had some on water, now I have some on air and it's still rolling up 50% overclocks on reference cooling. Producing fps comparable to overclocked 7850s while being considerably cheaper. You know the bois when they start hating on used cards while ignoring the fact that it's performance places it above many new cards, cards which can cost two to three times as much.

So which is it though Russian, ignoring all the garbage you shewed in your post. Is the 7970 a better card, because it's cheaper, faster, overclocks better, while using way more power, or isn't it? You can't have it both ways like the other bois. The metric of what makes a card good or bad can't simply change based on which price bracket we're looking at.

AMD 5xxx series, isn't that where AMD fed you bois a DX10 card with DX11 slapped on the box? Talk about getting hosed by AMD.

I wonder what 5xxx series feel when they hear about the latest DX11 title that supports tessellation, pain and remorse would be my guess.

5850 isn't even a comparable card, it's a DX10 card vs DX11, get over it AMD burned you.

You do know I will get an infraction for this thread, and I will still not care right? Anand is a heaven for AMD fanbois, that's why it's so dead around here. This is probably one of the slowest moving tech forums on the web, nobody wants to post here with the raving retard fanboy army AMD has assembled that is fully backed by stupid moderators.

I got my 6990 for close to nothing. U$60.

Who cares that it uses 400W of power. (probably the same as that 470 at 900mhz) OP should get one.

Derailed like a boss.

6990 isn't from Nvidia, try to stay on topic.

Good deal though, pity about AMD's drivers though, 6xxx will be legacy soon so I couldn't recommend them to someone else since CF is hard enough on AMD's current cards.
 
Last edited:

Arzachel

Senior member
Apr 7, 2011
903
76
91
Aww, Balla's gone off the deep end and is calling everyone that doesn't absolutely agree with him AMD fanboy conspirators against 470 greatness again :(

Nobody is arguing that the 470s aren't working out great for you. It's just that your case is so extremely specific, that it's pretty hard to suggest it for anyone else.

You're taking already power hungry cards (the 7970 you like to deride pulls less than a 470), buying them used, overclocking and overvolting them a ton, Watercooling them and running them in tri-sli. Two of these at the same time already limits the appeal to enthusiasts only. Three is pretty uncommon even for enthusiasts. All five... well how many people do you know running a similar setup to yours?

We get it that you don't mind the numerous drawbacks and it works amazingly well for you. We're actually happy for you because tech and tweaking is fun! But when you proclaim the GTX470 the god king of the internet in every thread without any regard for the needs and wants of anyone else and then get defensive when someone disagrees, you come off as an asshole, which is why the card has pretty much become an in-joke around here.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Aww, Balla's gone off the deep end and is calling everyone that doesn't absolutely agree with him AMD fanboy conspirators against 470 greatness again :(

Nobody is arguing that the 470s aren't working out great for you. It's just that your case is so extremely specific, that it's pretty hard to suggest it for anyone else.

You're taking already power hungry cards (the 7970 you like to deride pulls less than a 470), buying them used, overclocking and overvolting them a ton, Watercooling them and running them in tri-sli. Two of these at the same time already limits the appeal to enthusiasts only. Three is pretty uncommon even for enthusiasts. All five... well how many people do you know running a similar setup to yours?

We get it that you don't mind the numerous drawbacks and it works amazingly well for you. We're actually happy for you because tech and tweaking is fun! But when you proclaim the GTX470 the god king of the internet in every thread without any regard for the needs and wants of anyone else and then get defensive when someone disagrees, you come off as an asshole, which is why the card has pretty much become an in-joke around here.


Heh, no I'm calling it like I see it. I feel the 470 was and still is a decent card, though the reasons have changed slightly, initially they were relative to why people feel the 7970 is a good card currently. I'd be more inclined to agree if it wasn't for the simple fact that we're discussing $500 6850s and 560Ti's.

I never suggested anyone buy a 470 in this thread, or any other that I'm aware of.

I don't like to deride the 7970, I only apply the same broken logic that is applied to the 470 to it. It's not ironic at all that it's seen as trolling or poor logic when used against an AMD card. Watercooling never even came up in this thread, that was reference air I was showing.

Anand is filled with "almost" enthusiasts, but when it comes down to it they are just people who spent more money than they should and only went half way.

However many do doesn't really matter, this isn't a popularity contest it's a tech forum. Where talking about tech that isn't popular gets you called a troll :)

The drawbacks of a 470 are inherently the same as the 7970, hotter, louder, more power hungry than the 680. And for a time it was actually more expensive, all of these "draw backs" are easily handled by someone competent, let alone an actual enthusiast who knows what he's doing with hardware.

I never once said the 470 was the best card, or the end all be all card. The OP asked for a comparable card, I produced a comparable card at less than half the price. The problem started when AMD butthurt entered the equation. Is it not comparable? Performance wise it is, shown this I have. It does use more power, I've shown it's not as bad as many seem to believe, capable of hitting a 50% overclock on reference air. I've hit several key areas of comparability, performance, and overclocking. There are differences though, such as cost, the 7850 is considerably more, power draw is another, the 470 draws considerably more.

This place swings like a monkey in a tree with it comes to talking points, the downsides you "claim" for the 470 can be used against the 7970. I'm pretty sure most 7970 users have figured out a way to handle it's excessive heat when overclocked. Around and around we go. Power doesn't matter, I got a 7970 it's slightly faster than the 680 while using considerably more power but this is ok cause it's AMD! I don't like the 470 because it overclocks just was well as the 7850 and has comparable performance but unlike the 7970 it's not priced similar to the card it's competing with it's less than half the cost. Me no like this, me want AMD me has to change what I value noaw different situation that no longer favors AMD therefore new rules of argument.

In-joke around, at the joke tech forum of the web, seems fitting. A tech forum that can't discuss tech without being reduced to fanboy arguments, I laugh every time I come here. I'm not getting defensive, I'm getting lulz. Far more reputable tech sites have already placed the 470 in the area of the 8800 GTX, while not quite as good as that card, it's saying power and overclocking have made it a great card. Let's not get it confused though, it's a great card not the greatest or the only choice for all. This thread was simply asking for a comparable card, not a 28nm card, not a equal perf/w or perf/mm2 or any other topic points used over the last two years by AMD fanboys. Comparable means performance unless otherwise stated, I provided it first by offering my opinion on the 448 and 570, then later when the topic started to discuss price and I opted in with my opinion that all current cards are overpriced. I gave my reasons for why I feel that way, and provided a comparable card for the 7850 as the OP requested. That is all, those are the facts. The rest of it is as I said, AMD butthurt.
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
I'd rather use my video card to cure cancer.

lol at the rest of your post.

I would have 2-3 7970s if they weren't 5-6 times more expensive and require another huge up front cost to power them to mine on them for over a year before getting a return on my investment in the form of buying other stuff that I may or may not have needed.

It's funny the insanely power hungry 7970 is touted by the AMD bois because it's faster than Nvidia's 28nm mid-range card. Is that praise worthy? Seems trifle to me, just like this 7850 rave this forum of bois is in. It's nothing new as I've just shown in this thread, Nvidia has had similar cards that did just as well. Overclocked further, to a higher degree of percentage, offered performance we're seeing now, at a lower price point over a year and half ago.

Forum doesn't like 470s, first it was because I had some on water, now I have some on air and it's still rolling up 50% overclocks on reference cooling. Producing fps comparable to overclocked 7850s while being considerably cheaper. You know the bois when they start hating on used cards while ignoring the fact that it's performance places it above many new cards, cards which can cost two to three times as much.

So which is it though Russian, ignoring all the garbage you shewed in your post. Is the 7970 a better card, because it's cheaper, faster, overclocks better, while using way more power, or isn't it? You can't have it both ways like the other bois. The metric of what makes a card good or bad can't simply change based on which price bracket we're looking at.

AMD 5xxx series, isn't that where AMD fed you bois a DX10 card with DX11 slapped on the box? Talk about getting hosed by AMD.

I wonder what 5xxx series feel when they hear about the latest DX11 title that supports tessellation, pain and remorse would be my guess.

5850 isn't even a comparable card, it's a DX10 card vs DX11, get over it AMD burned you.

You do know I will get an infraction for this thread, and I will still not care right? Anand is a heaven for AMD fanbois, that's why it's so dead around here. This is probably one of the slowest moving tech forums on the web, nobody wants to post here with the raving retard fanboy army AMD has assembled that is fully backed by stupid moderators.



6990 isn't from Nvidia, try to stay on topic.

Good deal though, pity about AMD's drivers though, 6xxx will be legacy soon so I couldn't recommend them to someone else since CF is hard enough on AMD's current cards.

Lol, you're so mad. Pretty sure it'll be slightly more than an infraction :rolleyes:
 

KingFatty

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2010
3,034
1
81
I don't like to deride the 7970, I only apply the same broken logic that is applied to the 470 to it. It's not ironic at all that it's seen as trolling or poor logic when used against an AMD card.

I like to hear your point of view, and I like to hear someone defending their setup. I also like when people avoid using broken logic or making stuff up because they get emotional.

So keep fighting the fight, though I prefer when people take the high road and make well-reasoned logical points, makes for good reading. Just don't fall for the temptation to use the same emotional-style trickery. I mean, if you wrestle with a pig, all that happens is you get dirty but the pig enjoys it.
 

N4g4rok

Senior member
Sep 21, 2011
285
0
0
You do know I will get an infraction for this thread, and I will still not care right? Anand is a heaven for AMD fanbois, that's why it's so dead around here. This is probably one of the slowest moving tech forums on the web, nobody wants to post here with the raving retard fanboy army AMD has assembled that is fully backed by stupid moderators.

Just a couple of things.

Any pro-AMD arguments found on the internet are not the delusional ramblings of an AMD fanboy. You say this forum is overrun with them, but it isn't fair to assume that when anytime someone posts in favor of an AMD product they're met with "AMD is bad and you should feel bad." That's no way to discuss any kind of tech-related news.

From the other side of the argument, we've seen plenty of Nvidia owners who have a little bit of a god complex. It's these guys who take any AMD argument and immediately assume it's wrong or the poster has no idea what they're talking about. These are the guys that start arguments with subtle postings about how Nvidia is and always will be better. Then a select few suddenly can't understand why they've offended anyone.

In the future, when complaining is done regarding firebrand AMD fans, please remember that it's the finger pointing and name calling found in posts like yours that have created them. if you want to ask others to make objective opinions without any kind of bias, i only ask that you do the same.