Wagoner resigns

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,773
10,077
136
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Any idea on who is taking over???

After what happened to the AIG CEO who would want this crummy job?
Fritz Henderson is next in line for the job internally.

It would not surprise me to see the administration appoint their "own" man. They would like to have the company under their complete control I'm certain. Dictate to them what they build, when they build it and who they sell it to.

It's of little consequence. Dead Corporation walking.

That is the democratic dream is it not to nationalize the car industry to force crappy little cars on the population. One industry down many many to go. Maybe he will go after the evil oil companies next like his hero in Hugo Chavez

 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?

The UAW wasn't just handed a giant wad of cash. GM was. Nice try. Blaming everything on the unions is just a smokescreen. They may have somewhat of a hand in labor costs, but they make no decisions with regard to what vehicles are developed and eventually produced.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?

The UAW wasn't just handed a giant wad of cash. GM was. Nice try. Blaming everything on the unions is just a smokescreen. They may have somewhat of a hand in labor costs, but they make no decisions with regard to what vehicles are developed and eventually produced.


Actually they did by driving labor cost sky high it forced GM to go with larger more profitable vehicles. Thanks to things like the jobs bank and Cadillac type health insurance for all employees past and present GM was forced into making highly profitable vehicles. The smaller cars are pointless for GM they don't make enough on them thanks to the union.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?

The UAW wasn't just handed a giant wad of cash. GM was. Nice try. Blaming everything on the unions is just a smokescreen. They may have somewhat of a hand in labor costs, but they make no decisions with regard to what vehicles are developed and eventually produced.


Actually they did by driving labor cost sky high it forced GM to go with larger more profitable vehicles. Thanks to things like the jobs bank and Cadillac type health insurance for all employees past and present GM was forced into making highly profitable vehicles. The smaller cars are pointless for GM they don't make enough on them thanks to the union.

Clearly, the market's demand had nothing to do with that. It's not like other companies have done the same thing. I mean, a well-to-do company like Toyota wouldn't make factories in the US dedicated to making similarly large, high profit vehicles.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?

The UAW wasn't just handed a giant wad of cash. GM was. Nice try. Blaming everything on the unions is just a smokescreen. They may have somewhat of a hand in labor costs, but they make no decisions with regard to what vehicles are developed and eventually produced.


Actually they did by driving labor cost sky high it forced GM to go with larger more profitable vehicles. Thanks to things like the jobs bank and Cadillac type health insurance for all employees past and present GM was forced into making highly profitable vehicles. The smaller cars are pointless for GM they don't make enough on them thanks to the union.

Clearly, the market's demand had nothing to do with that. It's not like other companies have done the same thing. I mean, a well-to-do company like Toyota wouldn't make factories in the US dedicated to making similarly large, high profit vehicles.

Sure demand had something to do with it but they were pushed that way by the union. Toyota is able to make both big and small cars at a nice profit thanks to not having to deal with the UAW.

 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
It doesn't matter if Wagoner is a good CEO or not. GM has an image problem, with Wagoner in charge. Heads have to roll over this debacle, this has been a long and painful death since the 1970s. The Obama government is just delaying the inevitable to save the UAW.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

Did Obama also demand that the head of the UAW step down, our shall they be rewarded instead?

The UAW wasn't just handed a giant wad of cash. GM was. Nice try. Blaming everything on the unions is just a smokescreen. They may have somewhat of a hand in labor costs, but they make no decisions with regard to what vehicles are developed and eventually produced.


Actually they did by driving labor cost sky high it forced GM to go with larger more profitable vehicles. Thanks to things like the jobs bank and Cadillac type health insurance for all employees past and present GM was forced into making highly profitable vehicles. The smaller cars are pointless for GM they don't make enough on them thanks to the union.

The jobs bank has been eliminated in the latest round of contracts/negotiations. Health insurance costs are mostly for retirees, which were promised when the company had the chance to fully fund those benefits. Besides, Honda/Toyota are at a competitive advantage due to the Japanese government sholdering the healthcare/retirement costs that our government does not for our workers. GM still made many smaller cars over the years, and the union didn't stop them then. Even if the unions were to mysteriously evaporate, GM would still be in the bind it is now.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: boomerang
Wagoner is getting out. The world may try to place the blame on him (IMO, rightfully so) but he's going to be able to tell them it didn't happen on his watch.
This is far more than him, as things with GM have been going down hill for a very long time.

Although I've said from the beginning that these bailouts were doing nothing but stemming a festering wound, it would have been interesting to wonder what would have happened if, say, $100B was thrown at each of these companies (less for smaller Chrysler) and a little less at banks. The manufacturers could have been close to erasing their debts.
It would not surprise me to see the administration appoint their "own" man. They would like to have the company under their complete control I'm certain. Dictate to them what they build, when they build it and who they sell it to.

It's of little consequence. Dead Corporation walking.
Yeah, if GM couldn't find the right guy I see no reason the gov can.

The repercussions of all this, as reality is starting to sink in, could be significant.
 

TheoPetro

Banned
Nov 30, 2004
3,499
1
0
I dont like this at all but I dont know if leaving him in would be good either. Their management is so entrenched and bureaucratic that anything other than a complete reorg is almost a waste. I dont think anyone here, or sitting on capital hill, knows enough of what Wagner has done to make an informed judgment on whether or not he should stay. Anyone who is put into that position is going to be spending 90% of their time playing the political game so they might as well just left him alone. From the outside it looks like a pretty moronic move.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
Once again we get to watch the government run another business. This is gonna be fascinating to watch.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,165
824
126
I really hope this is not the death knell for GM. They make some fabulous products and to see them go the way of the Dodo would be sad, especially for car enthusiasts. Hopefully someone can step in and get things turned around.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
This guy should've resigned a long time ago. Why is it that the Ford CEO can run the company so that they don't require bailouts whereas Wagoner who has been in the industry so long can run GM into the ground and not have consequences?

Because Ford aquired a line of credit by mortaging their company to the hill before the credit freeze. It has nothing at all to do with how the companies were run.

I was under the impression that GM only made money from financing (GMAC)... GMAC screwed them over too.
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
This guy should've resigned a long time ago. Why is it that the Ford CEO can run the company so that they don't require bailouts whereas Wagoner who has been in the industry so long can run GM into the ground and not have consequences?

The Ford CEO has only been at the job for less than 2 years.
Ford's current performance has nothing to do with him.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
As part of Chrysler's buyout program, Oscar and Lisa Mendez will each get $75,000 in cash and a $25,000 voucher for a new vehicle as they embark on a new path, pursuing careers in law enforcement.
...
All Chrysler hourly workers under 55 who take the buyout will receive their UAW health insurance for 6 months. Most workers will have the option to buy an additional 6 months' coverage for $8,000, which is deducted from the buyout, or an extra 18 months for $24,000.
If the Mendezes' Chrysler health insurance runs out before either of them finds a new job with coverage, they plan to insure their children through MIChild, a Medicaid program for which parents pay only $10 per month per child.
Those taking the buyout in Michigan may qualify for the state's No Worker Left Behind program, which offers tuition assistance of up to $5,000 per person for two years.
While Chrysler wouldn't say how many hourly workers it would like to accept the buyout offer, getting workers to leave is critical for the company's turnaround efforts.
The union and automaker have already worked together on a tentative new deal to save money.
That included eliminating the controversial jobs bank, through which laid-off workers receive most of their pay. The deal generally brings the company's labor costs close to those of Japanese automakers' plants in the United States



http://www.freep.com/article/2...7/BUSINESS01/903270317

That's some sweet bailout money!

 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Seems to me the Federal Government is losing a lot more money than GM.. maybe we need to demand Obama step down?
Glad someone said it. :thumbsup:

Yeah, now you guys care about the government losing money :roll:
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,858
31,346
146
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Dari
This is a good start. I'm not sure where this will lead but a smaller, more efficient GM would be good.

link

GM CEO Rick Wagoner to resign

As troubled automaker appeals for federal help, Rick Wagoner gives up top spot following years of losses and declining U.S. market share.
By CNNMoney.com staff
Last Updated: March 29, 2009: 6:03 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- General Motors Chief Executive Rick Wagoner will resign as part of the federal government's plan to bail out the struggling automaker, White House and GM officials told CNN Sunday.

Wagoner's departure comes the day before President Obama is expected to announce the latest details of the government's assistance plan for GM and Chrysler LLC.

A GM spokesman declined to comment, but a statement from the company said, "We are anticipating an announcement soon from the administration regarding the restructuring of the U.S. auto industry."

The two automakers face a Tuesday deadline to prove to the Treasury Department that they can be viable in the long term. Without such a finding, the government can recall the $13.4 billion it has already lent to GM (GM, Fortune 500) and the $4 billion it loaned to Chrysler.

A 32-year company veteran, Wagoner has been CEO of GM since 2000.

:thumbsdown: Seems BHO "demanded" he step down. THAT IMO is not his job to demand. As much as the management has sucked at GM and some other companies - it is no worse than the gov't.

You know, I'm a bit wary of such demands coming from the POTUS, but think about it: when they're paying the bills.....
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,858
31,346
146
Originally posted by: Corn

Craig should take a little initiative and investigate which vehicles are actually selling in America (read that as which vehicles Americans want to buy). People aren't buying hybrids (enough so that Honda even quit making their version of the Accord hybrid). Craig, like Obama, has no clue what kinds of vehicles American's want to buy. American's don't want hybrid vehicles, otherwise they'd comprise more than 2.4% of vehicles sold.

One point: Honda stopped manufacturing the Accord Hybrid b/c no one wants a freaking V6 hybrid that gets the same gas-mileage of a non-hybrid V4.

seriously....who the hell is in that kind of market anyway? It was a dumb idea at inception and I'm surprised it didn't fail sooner. And I love Honda, but that car didn't fail b/c Americans didn't want hybrids. It failed b/c it didn't understand the hybrid market.
 

Generator

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
793
0
0
All GM had to do was make one damn car that got people excited. Their trucks and SUV are nice. But just one damn car. Regardless GM could bankrupt itself a dozen times over and still have opportunity at rebirth with one car. Sure GM as we know it now would be dead, but if this company wants to restructure I can easily see them being a great smaller company with a product that sells. A not just in China.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,801
8,380
136
Originally posted by: Generator
All GM had to do was make one damn car that got people excited. Their trucks and SUV are nice. But just one damn car. Regardless GM could bankrupt itself a dozen times over and still have opportunity at rebirth with one car. Sure GM as we know it now would be dead, but if this company wants to restructure I can easily see them being a great smaller company with a product that sells. A not just in China.

<sarcasm on> But you see, it's the UAW that makes all the decisions on what product lines to offer, and the UAW dictates to Management what the wage scale and benefit packages should amount to. Management is just a rubber stamp for the UAW, and the whole crisis in this lne of manufacturing is exclusively the UAW's fault for having such overpowering bargaining power for its members that Management just agrees to all their demands and lets the UAW run the whole industry.<sarcasm off>

Can you just imagine what those non-union assemby line workers in this line of work would actaully be making if not for the unionized workers setting a benchmark for them to peg their wages on?

Without representation to keep Management honest, Management, being driven by its BoD and investors demanding maximum short term profits would turn that industry into an automotive version of Wally World: take over the market by selling cheap autos/trucks/SUV's at high volumes/low lifespan to undercut the competition badly enough to stop them from producing and marketing a better quality product. Management and investors win, workers and consumers lose.

Back on topic, what you say makes sense, but along with that is the fact that the Big Three had lost major consumer confidence over the years when THEIR MANAGEMENT arrogantly assumed that they had a captive market that they could dictate terms to and did not need to worry about those "cheap foreign imports EVER" and only woke up to their delusion after they lost too much ground to catch up. They forgot that reputations are hard to build, even harder to regain and so easy to lose.

However, IMHO, this is the ideal time for the Big Three to recapture market share, by doing to the foreign auto makers what the off-shore auto makers did to them.

<sarcasm on> Unless, of course, the UAW steps in and directs Management to do otherwise. <sarcasm off>

 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
Originally posted by: quest55720
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Any idea on who is taking over???

After what happened to the AIG CEO who would want this crummy job?
Fritz Henderson is next in line for the job internally.

It would not surprise me to see the administration appoint their "own" man. They would like to have the company under their complete control I'm certain. Dictate to them what they build, when they build it and who they sell it to.

It's of little consequence. Dead Corporation walking.

That is the democratic dream is it not to nationalize the car industry to force crappy little cars on the population. One industry down many many to go. Maybe he will go after the evil oil companies next like his hero in Hugo Chavez

GM's new upcoming product line
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Futures are down on GM stock now less than 20%. I would have expected more than that. Futures market-wide are down the most they have been in weeks, though, this probably being one of the key reasons.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
White House questions viability of GM, Chrysler

Some excerpts.

President Barack Obama and his top advisers have determined that neither company is viable and that taxpayers will not spend untold billions more to keep the pair of automakers open forever.

Officials say they are confident GM can put together a plan that will keep production lines moving in the coming years. They planned to send a team to Detroit to help with that restructuring.
The taxpayers are now running GM. All of you that think you know how to run a car company are now in charge. See the Pelosimobile link two posts up

Aides note that Obama inherited the auto mess from his predecessor, President George W. Bush.
Lest we forget.

After sleeping on it, I'm now convinced that Obama and his team of car manufacturer wannabees, sat Wagoner down and told him how they planned to run his car company. Wagoner probably told them to get fucked right after he told them it couldn't be done. My guess would be that the Obama team knew what the outcome would be and were eagerly anticipating it.

President Pelosi probably spent her night wiggling her legs in excitement knowing that starting today, she can guide our country with her vision of what a car should be. She'll be drafting plans as she jets back and forth across the country. I'm sure the Obama team feels they can have uber-green cars spewing lilac vapors out of their tailpipes on the ground by the end of the 3rd quarter. After all, it won't take much more than the snap of their fingers to make it happen.

GM will be in Chapter 7 before the end of the 2nd quarter.

Edit: Some of you may find this interesting reading. Others won't.

http://www.autoextremist.com/current/