dahunan
Lifer
- Jan 10, 2002
- 18,191
- 3
- 0
What is racist about this? If they riot they'll just end destroying their own town.
you cannot see how racist your post was or are you just 13 and playing games?
What is racist about this? If they riot they'll just end destroying their own town.
you cannot see how racist your post was or are you just 13 and playing games?
not sure on that infohawks post seemed more blaming the "punk" for getting shot the officer.
The entire situation started because Grant and his buddies decided it was okay to fight in public with another group. For a guy on parole after being released from prison a few months ago IMHO that was a horrible decision to make in his life. A decision which lead to a chain of events which concluded with his ultimate death via accidental use of a firearm by a BART PD officer.
Yet another thread where classy makes a fool of himself. This is almost worse than the P&N thread about the Chicago handgun ban
The entire situation started because Grant and his buddies decided it was okay to fight in public with another group. For a guy on parole after being released from prison a few months ago IMHO that was a horrible decision to make in his life. A decision which lead to a chain of events which concluded with his ultimate death via accidental use of a firearm by a BART PD officer.
Arguments beginning with 'the entire situation started...' are usually bad, minimizing the issue under discussion to make the only issue the earlier background one.
What is this were you being shot unjustifiably by a police officer who had pulled you over for speeding? Would you want to hear how 'the situation was started by you speeding'?
None of your comments change the situation. These young thugs are acting terribly and criminally, that doesn't change the issue of the officer mistaking his gun and taser. The fact he'd been criminal before and was on parole is very bad for him, but doesn't change the issue of the officer mistaking his gun and taser. Instead, it just sort of implies 'oh this was a parolee, so dehumanize him and it's not that big a deal'.
No one's arguing that I've seen against the behavior of Grant and his criminal friends being bad and wrong, or that it's not a very good thing the police were arresting them.
You know, Miranda rights were invented for a guy named Miranda - who was legitimately a nasty criminal.
But you don't say "I'm not going to be concerned about violating his rights now that I found out he's a nasty criminal". Two separate issues.
No one is nominating Grant for citizen of the year for you to debunk that. He was a criminal being arrested. The notable issue is the lethal police mistake.
The rest is irrelevant to that - except to imply excusing it.
Actually, it does change the situation.None of your comments change the situation. These young thugs are acting terribly and criminally, that doesn't change the issue of the officer mistaking his gun and taser. The fact he'd been criminal before and was on parole is very bad for him, but doesn't change the issue of the officer mistaking his gun and taser. Instead, it just sort of implies 'oh this was a parolee, so dehumanize him and it's not that big a deal'.
Grant also had a criminal record; according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Grant served several months in state prison in 2007 and 2008. The Department of Corrections didnt disclose the offenses for which Grant was sentenced.
Records at the main Alameda County Courthouse in Oakland indicate that Grant had 12 separate cases between April 12, 2004, and May 8, 2008. But the records for all of those cases are at the Hayward Hall of Justice and werent immediately available. Source
Let's look at it this way...
By the show of hands, how many of you have been in prison? How many of you were recently released from jail? How many of you were on parole? How many of you would like to be involved in altercations that would results in you being faced down on the pavement? How many of you would try to resist arrests? (I'm not even asking other pertinent questions surrounding the life and choices of the person that was shot).
If you can answer all of those questions, then you know where I'm going with them.
It's all kind of funny watching the disappointment of the people waiting for free loots from rioting.
But, if I was on the jury, I would have acquitted the cop.
The best quote from all of this? "... we should get the United Nations to investigate this..."
It was NEVER disputed, not even by the prosecution, that Grant was in fact resisting or at least being uncooperative/noncompliant with the officers' instructions. The notion that Grant wasn't resisting at all is the 'street' version of the events that does not mesh with multiple videos of the moments leading up to Mersehle announcing his intention to use his tazer on Grant.For those of you who say this was an accident- if you have seen the video, you would've seen 2 guys with their bodies on Grant when none of the other detainees were doing anything.
Its kind of sad. A black life ain't worth 10 cent in the eyes of so many of the AT faithful. All these comments about this guy about what he did, the black community, and etc. Nothing this guy did warranted him being shot in the back. Nothing at all. This wasn't karma or payback or any of that other nonsense.
This was a guy who could have and should have been handcuffed and sent back to jail if need be. That should have been the end result. But instead we have the same ole tired story of circumstances and excuses, but the story ends the same another black guy ends up dead. Its pathetic to read some of the posts cheering and laughing. He may been a lot things both good and bad, but on this day he didn't deserve to die.
But one day the majority will be the minority. One day its going to be alright..........
hahaha! There have been a few incidents where WHITE people were shot by officers who mistakenly pulled their firearm instead of their taser.But one day the majority will be the minority. One day its going to be alright..........
hahaha! There have been a few incidents where WHITE people were shot by officers who mistakenly pulled their firearm instead of their taser.
But we don't hear about those in the national news for days on end because....you and everyone else damn well knows why. Squeaky wheel gets the oil!
well he did use a shell that cost about $0.45.
so it was worth at least that much.
His life was worthless becuase he continuely made bad choices.
Thats not the officers fualt.
What you want reperations ?
well he did use a shell that cost about $0.45.
so it was worth at least that much.
His life was worthless becuase he continuely made bad choices.
Thats not the officers fualt.
What you want reperations ?
hahaha! There have been a few incidents where WHITE people were shot by officers who mistakenly pulled their firearm instead of their taser.
But we don't hear about those in the national news for days on end because....you and everyone else damn well knows why. Squeaky wheel gets the oil!
free 50" flat screens?hehehehehehe
You are full of jokes. But oh in about another 15 years or so, wonder how many jokes you'll have then? Reparartions? Nah, bigger goals than that![]()
hehehehehehe
You are full of jokes. But oh in about another 15 years or so, wonder how many jokes you'll have then? Reparartions? Nah, bigger goals than that![]()
free 50" flat screens?
They were mentioned at trial by an expert witness who had documented prior incidents and also mentioned by a number of media reports/articles about this case.Really you got any links? Seriously, post some links?