Pretty sure that it's know that the whistle blower doesn't have direct knowledge. Sounds like the Progressheviks still had some hearsay witnesses left over from Kavanaugh and repurposed them to get their money's worth.
1. I'm pretty sure we don't actually know with any certainty what the whistleblower does or doesn't know.
Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.
Inevitably, yes. There was a good article on Slate recently on how Roy Cohn shaped Trump’s mind. The litigous nature of NY real estate power consolidation amplified by social media and the executive power of the Presidency.
He has been the front runner with ample time back in the spotlight to change it. I’ve heard and seen younger progressives quite eager to spread and share the Ukranian dirt.
Your post has removed all doubt I had towards your emotional intelligence and reading comprehension. Bye danky, its been fun!
As others have said, if everything is not above board, Biden does not get a pass. I have a particular distaste for how viral social media mobs are now driving news cycles and narratives.
They don't record calls or have Perry Mason style stenographers typing away listening in on classified calls.
That's what you get for thinking...…. YES anyone can make a transcript and sadly that is what happens to all white house calls! I am very sure after the transcript is finished the call gets deleted....depending on it`s importance!
A non-Benghazi way isn't very specific, is it? That could be anything from Breitbart "journalists" reading their usual tea leaves to an official DOJ investigation. I know you don't support Trump or his minions. I also know you are prone to believing just about any dirt hurled toward Obama/Hillary/etc. and assume this includes Biden.I said there needs to be an actual investigation? Perhaps that is what you wished I said so let's see...
Two things, I did not nor imply "requires an actual investigation", nor anything like that. I meant precisely what I said. I expect that people WILL LOOK INTO the events surrounding Biden. I didn't mention Congressional hearings whatsoever. I didn't even MENTION Congress. Apparently that in the entire investigative aspect of journalism this will be a topic absolutely no one will look into. It simply doesn't exist. Well, history suggests that is not the case, and reporters nosing around is "not an actual investigation. Hell, I even mentioned any Bengazi persecution being a no go. Clearly you have yet to figure out that I am in no way supportive of Trump or his minions but on the other hand I have no obligation to check my brain at the door when considering any of this for anyone's litmus test or sensibilities.
You dumb shit, I'm on your side
I was focused more on your use of the word if here because it shows you still have a hard time recognizing complete bullshit.
Additionally, this last part is incredibly naive given what we have witnessed in politics over the last several decades. People still believe Hillary needs to be locked up. Investigations finding nothing means nothing. How have you not learned this lesson yet? The standard for Democrats is impossibly high for most Americans. Someone writing something on a blog is all that is needed to permanently tarnish any Democrat's image until the day they die, let alone something aired on Fox News, or an official statement from any GOP politician.
Facebook
Twitter