Torsell too drunk to consent to sobriety test

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

chambersc

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
6,247
0
0
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Read in the paper today that his lawyer has sucessfully won cases by excluding evidence in this manner. The cops apparently screwed up a freaking lot on this one. Apparently it is a trick they tend to use that can really end up biting them in the ass.

Not only is there a criminal suit but I would hope that both families are bringing a civil suit against this person --If he's still a dependent I would hope they both of the families that were hurt sue the ****** out of his (the drunk scum) parents. Wreck his whole family and leave no prisoners.

And this is why I'm glad the justice system does not rely on the opinions of a single person (in most instances) for judgment

As am I. However, I am realistic in my assessment that he could and will be sued back into the stonage. I further hope that, as most 20yr old college student are, he is a dependent so that they may go after his parents. This is justice. This is the modern civil system.
 

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
It's horrible what happened :(

This basically leaves my opinion at the same place - if you drink and drive, I really don't have any respect for you at all, and no, there is no chance of forgiveness.
 

bignateyk

Lifer
Apr 22, 2002
11,288
7
0
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: SirStev0
Read in the paper today that his lawyer has sucessfully won cases by excluding evidence in this manner. The cops apparently screwed up a freaking lot on this one. Apparently it is a trick they tend to use that can really end up biting them in the ass.

Not only is there a criminal suit but I would hope that both families are bringing a civil suit against this person --If he's still a dependent I would hope they both of the families that were hurt sue the ****** out of his (the drunk scum) parents. Wreck his whole family and leave no prisoners.

And this is why I'm glad the justice system does not rely on the opinions of a single person (in most instances) for judgment

As am I. However, I am realistic in my assessment that he could and will be sued back into the stonage. I further hope that, as most 20yr old college student are, he is a dependent so that they may go after his parents. This is justice. This is the modern civil system.


How is ruining the lives of his parents justice? Somehow I doubt they had any control over the situation (unless he was living at home at the time)
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: txrandom
Do what they do in other countries: Automatic death penalty if you drive drunk.

What countries are you talking about?
 

glutenberg

Golden Member
Sep 2, 2004
1,941
0
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
I am at a loss at how messed up this is.

He did it. He knows he did it.

what kind of piece of sh!t parents does he have that they would think it is ok to try to skate on a technicality after murdering one kid, crippling another and destroying the lives of both their families??!!!

i am sorry... i do not normally curse here.. but this kid and his family as pieces of sh!t.

the lawyer... well, he is a lawyer.. nuff said.

i will be very happy when this kid loses this case and his parents are bankrupt paying legal fees. i am pretty sure that his insurance company will not pay, since he was DUI, so this will either be a state funded defense, or the parents will have to pay... as they should.

It's their child; they're going to do what they can to support him regardless. I would expect nothing less from them.

Edit: As for the lawyer, he's there to try and prevent reactionary justice such as that expressed by many of the posts in this thread.

There is a big difference between supporting someone and looking for loopholes to get them to skate for when the crap hits the fan.

An honorable parent would raise their children step up to the plate and own up to what they have done. a piece of crap helps them to get off, using any means necessary.

Can we assume you're not a parent yourself?
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
There is a big difference between supporting someone and looking for loopholes to get them to skate for when the crap hits the fan.

An honorable parent would raise their children step up to the plate and own up to what they have done. a piece of crap helps them to get off, using any means necessary.

Can we assume you're not a parent yourself?

My mom's told me already that if I do something wrong enough that it lands me in jail, I shouldn't bother wasting my phonecall to call home.
If I got drunk and killed someone else, I don't think my parents or sister would want me around anymore. I can't blame them either.
This guy was stupid enough to get drunk enough to the point that a lot of people might just pass out, and then he went out driving. Hopefully the court doles out exactly what the arrogant a--hole deserves.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Whisper
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
I am at a loss at how messed up this is.

He did it. He knows he did it.

what kind of piece of sh!t parents does he have that they would think it is ok to try to skate on a technicality after murdering one kid, crippling another and destroying the lives of both their families??!!!

i am sorry... i do not normally curse here.. but this kid and his family as pieces of sh!t.

the lawyer... well, he is a lawyer.. nuff said.

i will be very happy when this kid loses this case and his parents are bankrupt paying legal fees. i am pretty sure that his insurance company will not pay, since he was DUI, so this will either be a state funded defense, or the parents will have to pay... as they should.

It's their child; they're going to do what they can to support him regardless. I would expect nothing less from them.

Edit: As for the lawyer, he's there to try and prevent reactionary justice such as that expressed by many of the posts in this thread.

There is a big difference between supporting someone and looking for loopholes to get them to skate for when the crap hits the fan.

An honorable parent would raise their children step up to the plate and own up to what they have done. a piece of crap helps them to get off, using any means necessary.

Can we assume you're not a parent yourself?

You can ... but you would be wrong.
 

SampSon

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
7,160
1
0
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
You can ... but you would be wrong.

And what would you do in this situation if it was your kid on trial?
There are two answers for this.
One is the answer she is supposed to give you in the situation you're putting her in.
The other is what she would actually do if her child was in that situation.
 

glutenberg

Golden Member
Sep 2, 2004
1,941
0
0
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
You can ... but you would be wrong.

And what would you do in this situation if it was your kid on trial?
There are two answers for this.
One is the answer she is supposed to give you in the situation you're putting her in.
The other is what she would actually do if her child was in that situation.

Pretty much what I was pointing out. It's so easy to take the "moral" highground when you're sitting safely out of trouble watching and judging other people's lives. Do you even think the parents are the ones who came up with this defense? It's not even up to the parents considering the "kid" is over 18. But, this is ATOT, spewing nonsense everywhere is the name of the game.
 

glutenberg

Golden Member
Sep 2, 2004
1,941
0
0
Originally posted by: Doctor Nyse


...Ok

You still killed a young man and maimed another.

Well, the lawyers are just trying whatever tricks are available (which may be wrong but has to be done). If the lawyers don't bring it up here there could be a mistrial regarding whether the kid was represented to the fullest degree. It's a silly method to excuse one of murder but it still needs to be put out there. Hopefully the judge will use common sense in interpreting the law instead of following it by the letter and throw out the attempt to strike the blood test results from evidence.
 

kindest

Platinum Member
Dec 15, 2001
2,697
0
0
theres no way the dude is getting off. now if he was Brandy on the other hand.
i feel bad for everyone involved except the drunk driver..
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
You can ... but you would be wrong.

And what would you do in this situation if it was your kid on trial?

First of all, my child was raised better than to ever be so irresponsible to get behind the wheel of a car while drunk.

But, putting that aside... my child was also raised better than to try to skate on her bad behaviour.

In this exact case... I would support my child. I would be right there, holding her hand and giving her moral support while she stands up and owns what she has done. And if that meant that I had to sell my home and lose every thing I worked my whole life to, to try to make amends to the other families, then I would do so.

What I would NOT do is try to blame anyone else, try to get her off on a technicality or hire a slimy lawyer to put the victims parents thru the heartbreak of a trial. And if that is what she tried to do, I would be more ashamed of her for that, then I would be over the horrible choice of getting behind the wheel.

And that is the God's honest truth of what I would do.

:)
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
As someone who attended the school in question and another large university, bignateyk is right. Thousands of underage kids drink every weekend at hundreds of more or less open parties and the police are totally blind.

This is totally ingrained in the town culture and university tradition. The school would be shut down before this was changed one bit. So complain all you want about carding and responsibility, but the only realistic expectation is to educate the underage kids on not driving after they are drunk.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
Originally posted by: aswedc
As someone who attended the school in question and another large university, bignateyk is right. Thousands of underage kids drink every weekend at hundreds of more or less open parties and the police are totally blind.

This is totally ingrained in the town culture and university tradition. The school would be shut down before this was changed one bit. So complain all you want about carding and responsibility, but the only realistic expectation is to educate the underage kids on not driving after they are drunk.

My daughter went there for one year. She was not happy there. The labs and lectures were too large and ... as you correctly state... the entire town's culture was around partying.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Originally posted by: mugs

Five Penn State students and a nonstudent are headed to Centre County Court on charges they provided alcohol consumed by a 20-year-old State College man accused of driving drunk when he struck and killed one pedestrian and critically injured a second.

Furnishing alcohol to a 20 year old is one thing... but it takes a heck of a lot of it to get to .242.


Welcome to every weekend at a public university. The people that gave him the booze arent to blame. There are hundreds of parties going on, and usually by the end of the night, the hosts dont even know half the people who are there. Its just how it works, so dont say something like "they should be carding everyone who shows up at the party and making sure that people dont drink too much"

He drank, he drove, its his responsibility, not anyone elses. He could have gotten that booze at any one of a hundred parties, and he probably wasnt even at one party the whole night.

The fact that he was underage had nothing to do with the accident. There are just as many of-age students who drink and drive around here than underage, probably more.

He should be punished to the max, but not the people who gave him booze.

bullsh*t. the people who threw the party are responsible too. they allowed a underage kid get totally smashed at THEIR party. if they were responsible people they would have monitored the situation by two ways.

1. Dont serve under age kids
2. make everybody fess up their car keys when they enter the door.

the party throwers are NOT responsible for the drunk driving, THEY are guilty of LETTING a minor get drunk tho.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: aswedc
As someone who attended the school in question and another large university, bignateyk is right. Thousands of underage kids drink every weekend at hundreds of more or less open parties and the police are totally blind.

This is totally ingrained in the town culture and university tradition. The school would be shut down before this was changed one bit. So complain all you want about carding and responsibility, but the only realistic expectation is to educate the underage kids on not driving after they are drunk.

My daughter went there for one year. She was not happy there. The labs and lectures were too large and ... as you correctly state... the entire town's culture was around partying.

It is indeed a party school. Do I have a problem with emancipated minors and the older but still under 21 year olds drinking? Not in the slightest. Drinking and driving is the wrong, and terrible, decision here. Things like that just need to stop. The police are hardly blind, the State College PD just asked Penn State for more money directly from the University to try to help assuage the costs of curbing underage drinking/alcohol abuse. Although, there have been 2-3 burglaries and 2-3 assaults (to the point of one person being shot in the face and another having his head beaten pretty severely) and not a single arrest made and no leads short of a sketch or two. You tell me what the police priority should be.

In a related note, something similar is happening in another case of drunk driving in State College. The lawyer young lady (Applegate) who struck a young man crossing the street on East College Ave is suing Zola's Bistro (upscale restaurant here) for serving to a "visibly intoxicated individual." While it seems this claim is a bit unsupported, it's happening.

Absolutely terrible tragedies these days. I just wish people would learn more from these sorts of events and stop being so stupid as to drink and drive.
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
Originally posted by: TheVrolok

The police are hardly blind, the State College PD just asked Penn State for more money directly from the University to try to help assuage the costs of curbing underage drinking/alcohol abuse.
Yeah whatever. Random Friday night in the fall - a herd of twenty freshmen walk by a State College cop, into a frat house. Repeat scene x100.

Are you seriously telling me the cop has no idea what's going to be happening in that house? Or that there's not enough money for him to go up to the door and do something about it?

When I was a freshman, my first day in the dorms, I was given fliers advertising various parties that weekend. Each one basically went like this: "Hey, my name is ____, this is the ____ fraternity, want a beer?" Like I said, the cops are blind.
 

fstime

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2004
4,382
5
81

quote:
Originally posted by: jman19
Drunk drivers are scum. Anyone remember the thread a while back where some posters were saying that the currently legal limit is BS beacuse they "can drive fine with a few beers in them?"



It is BS. The only thing the current laws do are collect money for the state.



Yup, I know my body and I can say 1 beer may be a lot for a 80 pound person but I feel fine after a couple.