thought: could this be from balls being inflated in a 70 degree room, and then being brought outside into 50 degree weather, which ended up around 40 by the end of the game?
Something has to happen. And it can't just be another fine or loss of draft pick. These guys cheat too much.
i just want to know how eits got to vote 11 times.
also, it's stupid that this is a big deal. from what i read, the patriots give their balls to the officials 2+ hours before the game to be inspected, and they inspected them, and they passed. and then during the game, it's not like the refs never touch or feel the footballs, they are in their hands every single play.
oh and i guess the deflated footballs make the colts offense only muster out 7 points, and makes it so the defense doesn't know how to tackle?
404 - big deal not found
thought: could this be from balls being inflated in a 70 degree room, and then being brought outside into 50 degree weather, which ended up around 40 by the end of the game?
It was 2 PSI, not 2 pounds of weight.
Not true. If the Colts had their balls at 14.5 PSI and they lost the same 2PSI the Patriots did, they would be within the acceptable range. However, like I mentioned above, the the Patriots were at the lower threshold, losing 2PSI would put the balls in fault.If that were the case then the Colts balls would also be underinflated the same.
A official checks out the balls then gives them to the teams. So they were the same when given out yet 11 of 12 of the Pats balls were not in regulation.
But yea if the game was won by a hair then you could make a case the colts should be in the SB. But it was a blowout. Brady and the rest of the starters could have been benched and drinking margaritas the 2nd half and still won.
Pats will lose some draft picks and get a fine, that's about it.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/spygate-tainted-previous-patriots-titles-161100743--nfl.htmlHere's what we do know about the past: After New England was caught in September, stories emerged of at least four previous spying incidents from seasons past being brought to the league's attention. That likely played a part in commissioner Roger Goddell sending out a summer memo specifically reminding teams of the filming rule.
Included was a reported charge that the Patriots filmed the sideline of the Detroit Lions during a regular-season game in 2006. That begs the common sense question: If Belichick would employ such tactics to beat a pathetic Lions team that finished the season 3-13, then why wouldn't he use it in a Super Bowl?
The Patriots beat the Philadelphia Eagles 24-21 in Super Bowl XXXIX and Eagles players have now expressed questions about how that game played out. Cornerback Sheldon Brown specifically wondered if it was just a coincidence that every time the Eagles blitzed Tom Brady on the decisive fourth-quarter drive, New England called the perfect antidote, a screen pass. Or did the Patriots, indeed, know the Eagles' defensive signals?
"I was like, 'Man, I never saw that many screens,' " Brown told the Associated Press. "Something's not right about that."
Said safety Brian Dawkins, "Now there's always going to be questions about the situation; was it great adjustments at halftime or what?"
Pittsburgh's Hines Ward brought up questions about the Patriots' two AFC championship game victories over the Steelers this decade. Others have complained about other games.
I don't understand why they have to cheat to win when they have one of the best QBs of all time and the undisputed best Tight End in football. I would love to see them lose a pick and belicheat will always have an asterisk in my book, especially after their super bowl vs Philly. Calling a screen pass on every single blitz is unheard of and no team gets that lucky.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/spygate-tainted-previous-patriots-titles-161100743--nfl.html
When an all time great like Brian Dawkins is questioning things, then something is up. Enjoy your counterfeit rings, Pat fans. A few more incidents like this from belicheat and those SB wins may eventually be asterisked.
lol ... yeah, when the losing team questions why they lost, it must be a scandal.
that is called a case of "being a sore loser".
I don't understand why they have to cheat to win when they have one of the best QBs of all time and the undisputed best Tight End in football. I would love to see them lose a pick and belicheat will always have an asterisk in my book, especially after their super bowl vs Philly. Calling a screen pass on every single blitz is unheard of and no team gets that lucky.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/spygate-tainted-previous-patriots-titles-161100743--nfl.html
When an all time great like Brian Dawkins is questioning things, then something is up. Enjoy your counterfeit rings, Pat fans. A few more incidents like this from belicheat and those SB wins may eventually be asterisked.
I can't imagine a ball holds it PSI very well when Gronk is spiking it into the ground.
So someone earlier said that the balls each team brings out are switched at halftime. So wouldnt that then benefit the colts with deflated balls in the 2nd half? Plus Gronk has 2 easy TDs he dropped. You sure deflated balls are easier to catch?![]()
lol ... yeah, when the losing team questions why they lost, it must be a scandal.
that is called a case of "being a sore loser".
Yeah, so future HOFers, ESPN Analyst, 9 Time Pro Bowler, and first man to 30 INTs/30 FF Brian Dawkins is a "sore loser". Congrats on watching football for the first time this year, noob.
http://youtu.be/qe5B8W8ZyR4
oh and i guess the deflated footballs make the colts offense only muster out 7 points
404 - big deal not found
The team plays with the balls they supply when on offense. So the Colts offense was using balls supplied by Indy and the Pats offense was using balls supplied by the Pats team. The Pats also provide the ball boys for the game, so even if they made it past inspection, its possible that the Pats ball boy could have deflated them.
Yeah, so future HOFers, ESPN Analyst, 9 Time Pro Bowler, and first man to 30 INTs/30 FF Brian Dawkins is a "sore loser". Congrats on watching football for the first time this year, noob.
http://youtu.be/qe5B8W8ZyR4
Cheaters!
Of course he's a sore loser, how many SBs did he win?
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-...d/4776756/patriots-should-be-held-accountablePrior to this point, the feeling was that if one or two footballs came in under weight, it was going to be hard for the NFL to make a decisive ruling against the Patriots. But 11 of 12 footballs is pretty strong evidence that something was happening from the time officials inspected the footballs 2 hours, 15 minutes before the game and the actual game itself.
The Patriots, assuming the initial inspection of footballs by referee Walt Anderson and his crew was done correctly and that weather wasn't a factor, should be held accountable.
As I wrote in Tuesday’s Patriots mailbag, “There are specific rules that prohibit altering the ball after they have been checked by the officials 2 hours, 15 minutes before game time. If the Patriots (or any team, for that matter) are knowingly breaking those rules outside of the normal scope of what is accepted (e.g. New York Times story on Eli Manning; Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers acknowledging how he likes his footballs to feel), there is a price to pay.”
You should go back and highlight the word assuming. Did everyone, or just about, in this thread fail their 5th grade science?
Lots of haters...
Everybody on earth pretty much feels the same way, which begs the question yet again of WHY are they cheating? They're good enough to win, why do they do things like this?
