<<Villon was also a poet (but a great one) and still a punk. As for Verlaine and Baudelaire, at least they only hurt themselves (and maybe each other). Ditto for Oscar Wilde.
>>
Here I simply mention that some great poets were also punks. By saying 'also, I did imply that Tupac is doing poetry. I did not say that he wasn't a poet.
<< I feel so strange even mentioning such great names in a thread about a punk like Tupac, who had less talent than most of my students >>
Here I did not say he was talentless. I said that as far as being a poet is concerned, I consider him to have less talent than most of my students. That is obviously a subjective opinion. The possibility also exists that most of my students are great poets. Afterall, their exam answers often contain more style than substance.
<<There's a reason he sold over 10 million copies of his albums, because what he said was real, and it all came from the heart - album after album he managed to do it the same. That takes talent dennil, and I'm sorry if you feel different.>>
Reality does not equate talent (For example, if Vanilla Ice had had a real criminal record, that wouldn't have made him more or less talented. It's irrelevant. Some really awful songs have been written about real military battles.). Telling it from the heart does not equate talent (Some heartless bastard can be more talented than a very sensitive individual). Selling 10 million albums does not equate talent (think Milli Vanilli). It's not what subject was described, whether or not the words were heartfelt and how many copies sold that reflect talent. It's how the lyrics were constructed, their lyricism, their metaphors, the level of their rhymes, the choice of words. If, following your title, we are to judge Tupac's value as a poet, we should base our judgement strictly on his poetry. Not on the music, not on the production, not on the success achived by the sales and promotion team. It is in that framework that I find him wanting according to my preferred esthetics. I am not a big fan of free form poetry. Obviously his words touch you deeply and for many that equals talent. I respect that. I agree that this might be viewed as talent. However I do not have to also like the words or be touched by them in the same way.
<<I'm sorry dennil, I mean no disrespect here - but when you come here and insult something I love, well, it's only natural for me to react. I'm sure you'd hate it if I called someone you love a loser or a moron.>>
I did not insult him. Read my words carefully. I just expressed my opinion of how I casually value the poetry of his lyrics and found it wanting. I don't think that my words were inflammatory. I happen to love Bob Dylan's singing and you did not see me go ballistic when he was made fun of in two threads some time ago. You guys should learn to accept that other people may have different opinions and values. Knee jerk reactions are bad for your stress levels.
Being a little more careful in reading what a person exactly said before one reacts can also avoid needless confrontations.
That's all I have to say.
Emotional (Carl Thomas)