• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

~~~The Official New Hampshire Primary Thread~~~

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: randym431
And HOW could anyone vote for McCain?
His victory speech reminded of old creepy Tim Hanson giving a speech back in high school.
Which btw, he got a D minus on.

because McCain is a can of 100% pure, not from concentrate awesomesauce.
 

sierrita

Senior member
Mar 24, 2002
929
0
0
Originally posted by: palehorse74


The only "incessant whining" I keep hearing is from Hillary herself, and her camp of faithful lovers of all things Clintonian.

PJ was correct... Hillary is a bitch, and she is also entirely fake. Every single thing she says or does is based on polls and the daily political forecast.

If anyone is a "shill" here, it's those who buy into the Clintonian Power Pack that has wrapped its arms around the Democratic Party for the last 16 years.

It's time for a fresh start... and it's time for a candidate with a little bit of integrity. Hillary won't provide either of those things.

bah...




Wow...:wine:


Whine, whine, whine.

 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
democrats want to lose the general election it seems.

seriously, regardless what the polls say, hillary won't win.
 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Again, I have to point out the eerily dead silence in this thread from the Paulbots. You know had he done even halfway decent in NH they would have been posting in this thread about 5 hours ago!
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
democrats want to lose the general election it seems.

seriously, regardless what the polls say, hillary won't win.

:music: Don't stop believing! Hold on to that feeling! :music:
You are deeper in denial than an Egyptian diver. :D
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Corbett
Again, I have to point out the earily dead silence in this thread from the Paulbots. You know had he done even halfway decent in NH they would have been posting in this thread about 5 hours ago!
Perhaps someone forgot to feed the hamsters that run their server? or maybe they both borrowed their parents' cars and went out to Starbucks for some alone time...?

meh...
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: Corbett
Again, I have to point out the earily dead silence in this thread from the Paulbots. You know had he done even halfway decent in NH they would have been posting in this thread about 5 hours ago!

:laugh:

Been at the GF's house. What do you want to hear? That I admit that I am an idiot for strongly supporting a candidate even though his odds are low? That I admit he won't win?

Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

Oh, the dollar is down again today? Oh look, oil is now $5 a gallon. Oh, you have "free" health insurance and it sucks? Pot is still illegal. Oh, look we're at war with another country.

And that's if the Dem's win. ;)

I'll get out my violin for all of you. :D
 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: Perry404
Most Paul supporters are anticipating doing well in NH & Michigan. If Paul can take 1st in one and 2nd in another he becomes the front runner.

Nomiation for joke of the year! Talk about being totally brainwashed! Anyone want to second my nomination?

Originally posted by: Perry404
I believe Paul can take first in NH. NH is filled with liberal libertarians. That means they know who Paul is.

Wrong again.
 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.


I don't think anyone said that there would be a NAU in 4 years. I know I didn't.
 

Corbett

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,074
0
76
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.


I don't think anyone said that there would be a NAU in 4 years. I know I didn't.

OK 8 years. Or even 20 years. Point is, its never going to happen.
 

Confusednewbie1552

Golden Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,047
0
0
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.

Why do you have such an insane passion for hating someone you claim to be a waste of time
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.


I don't think anyone said that there would be a NAU in 4 years. I know I didn't.

OK 8 years. Or even 20 years. Point is, its never going to happen.

I didn't say 8 years, nor 20 years. I never said any amount of years. But never say never. :D
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
So much for New Hampshire being a rogue state of proud independents...they just nominated the two biggest status quo establishment candidates in the race.

I also love how the media is now framing Hillary's win as this big upset? Considering she was the frontrunner through the entire summer, if anything it was an upset that she lost Iowa and nearly lost NH.

Need a bounce in the polls...just add tears...Obama may need to pull out his Oprah secret weapon.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
^ McCain as status quo?? I thought the key word to describe McCain was 'maverick'?

I think he MIGHT be a different President than the last few we have seen. Then again congress may stop him for making any real changes.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
^ McCain as status quo?? I thought the key word to describe McCain was 'maverick'?

I think he MIGHT be a different President than the last few we have seen. Then again congress may stop him for making any real changes.

McCain's actually shown his willingness to work with the other party, though, and unlike some people (Romney, Rudy), he hasn't tried to run away from his bipartisan accomplishments (except perhaps immigration, which I think he's MORE than gotten the message on).
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
^ McCain as status quo?? I thought the key word to describe McCain was 'maverick'?

I think he MIGHT be a different President than the last few we have seen. Then again congress may stop him for making any real changes.

Oh FFS... McCain is like the 2nd coming of Bob Dole.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,982
55,382
136
Shocking.

I told you people that you were drawing waaaaaaayyyyyy too many conclusions from Iowa.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Confusednewbie1552
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: bamacre
Four years from now, we'll have the moral authority to bitch about all the problems going unsolved, and the new ones that pop up.

I'd love to bring back up your conspiracy theories in 4 years just to see how they played out. North American Union would be number one on my list to see just how that turned out.

In any case, good waste of money donating to Paul. And here I thought his supporters were for fiscal responsiblity.

Why do you have such an insane passion for hating someone you claim to be a waste of time

these antipaul-bot are even more obnoxious than the paul-bots. I'd take a bamacre or perry404 comment over a pabster or corbett comment any day.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
democrats want to lose the general election it seems.

seriously, regardless what the polls say, hillary won't win.

:music: Don't stop believing! Hold on to that feeling! :music:
You are deeper in denial than an Egyptian diver. :D

You are trippin', pally.. as usual. Hillary is the only way the Dems can lose this fall, and you seem intent on having that happen. IMO just so you can keep bitching on internet forums like this one.
I mean.. think about it for one second without that partisan stick up your ass. Obama brings all the same ideological agenda to the table... AND a lot of the righties will vote for him... happily. In the meantime, even the most leftist of the righties would rather kill their mothers, curse God, and vote for Satan before voting for Hillary.
I'm gonna ask you for the millionth time... are you really this fscking stupid?
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
democrats want to lose the general election it seems.

seriously, regardless what the polls say, hillary won't win.

:music: Don't stop believing! Hold on to that feeling! :music:
You are deeper in denial than an Egyptian diver. :D

You are trippin', pally.. as usual. Hillary is the only way the Dems can lose this fall, and you seem intent on having that happen. IMO just so you can keep bitching on internet forums like this one.
I mean.. think about it for one second without that partisan stick up your ass. Obama brings all the same ideological agenda to the table... AND a lot of the righties will vote for him... happily. In the meantime, even the most leftist of the righties would rather kill their mothers, curse God, and vote for Satan before voting for Hillary.
I'm gonna ask you for the millionth time... are you really this fscking stupid?

shit alot of democrats would rather vote for McCain or huck than hillary