- Jul 16, 2001
- 7,571
- 178
- 106
Originally posted by: blckgrffn
I have a 3400+ @ 2.58, DDR400 @215 1T, 6800 NU @ 385/875, DFI Lanparty.
I hate steam too :| but I love the games, so I guess that is where are all stuck...
Later,
Nat
Nat, did you say if your 6800NU was unlocked or not? I can't remember, and can't seem to locate it in this post, although I was pretty sure you had said it somewhere. Anywho, I ran those lower AA tests for you. I ran the game at 2xAA and 8xAF forced in my control panel, and I dropped my image quality slider from high quality to plain jane quality. I scored 50.3fps in Doom 3 at 16x12, which is quite impressive, and the game looked just as fantastic to boot. Are you using the in-game 8xAF that is enabled when playing on the in-game high quality setting, or are you forcing 8xAF in your CP?
47.3fps if I turn my CP quality settings back to high quality, but leave my AA at 2x.
It seems like the lack of an extra 128MB memory is what makes the huge difference between 2x AA and 4x AA. Even softmodding my card only allows me to gain a few extra frames over you, as at that point it's mostly memory bandwidth determining the performance of the game. I don't think you'd really need 4x AA in Doom 3 anyway. The game is dark, and you're spending most of your time wetting your pants, so I doubt you'd notice any jaggie lines at 2x.
I also just ran some FarCry benchies. The scores are almost exactly the same as my 2.3 barton. FarCry seems GPU dependant almost right off the bat in my situation.