JSt0rm
Lifer
- Sep 5, 2000
- 27,399
- 3,947
- 126
Also on Outlander, it was only released in 81 theaters! It was no wonder why no one went to it because you were lucky if there were 2 theaters in your state that had it playing. Personally I really liked the movie. I think it would have done better had they managed to get a PG-13 rating, but can understand the R for the gore (which I also understand why they kept it because it would have really diminished the end movie to remove/alter many of those scenes). In the end, it was a movie that the publishers bailed on by not putting it in more theaters and not advertising for it at all. I was going to the movies a lot back then (probably every weekend), and I didn't see a single trailer for it (and quite obviously, neither did anyone else). But it is a decent movie (a sci-fi twist on beowulf). Certainly better than "Cowboys and Aliens" and yet that managed 100mill in the domestic box office (because it actually was played in ~3800 theaters in the USA, vs 81 for Outlander).
That said, this is getting way off topic.
Well if its good or not if a movie doesnt test well they arent going to put 80 million in adverts on it. Thats just the reality of the film business.
