• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

so wrong. college instate tuition and illegals

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: mugs
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state. As long as the federal government is content with ignoring them, the states are going to treat them like their other taxpayers.

Your neice's roommate's parents don't pay taxes to Colorado. Not sure how they fit in here.

ding ding ding

Exactly. All this hatred of illegal immigrants is just a modern form of the 19th century know-nothing party, and like them, people who this is a hot button know nothing about the issues.

Here, I fixed that for you. God forbid people be upset about people blatantly breaking the law, putting a strain on our education and healthcare systems and not only getting a pass but extra benefits as well.

You can't call them criminals when the only law they broke is "being here" I mean, come on. That's intellectual dishonesty at its worst.

They just plain aren't criminals in any fair sense of the word.

All you have to do to fix the "illegal" problem is to legalize the things that are normal human behavior. If we had a rational system without quotas, where you could get in so long as you were healthy and had work, I'd agree with you guys.

Well said. I'm glad that there are others who feel like this regarding the "illegal" immigration issue. It gets depressing feeling that I am in the minority. My personal feeling is that these "illegal" immigrants give more to this society than they take out. This is the way it is now and the way it was in the past when this great country was built by immigrants. The above can be a point of contention since some economists will agree with me while others will disagree -- which is a sign that this is a complicated issue.

I also wonder about the people who use the "rule of law" argument. I wonder just exactly how law abiding they have been during their lives. Did they ever drive past the speeding limit? Did they ever illegally download mp3s? Did they ever drink/buy alcohol when they were under-aged? Did they ever shoplift or did stupid things (that are illegal) when they were young? Did they ever try pot?

And here they get all bent out of shape because someone came here to work so they could feed their families.

sure i speed, who doesn't? But you will not see me sneaking into Canada and demand/expect the same benefits as a canadian citizen.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: mugs
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state. As long as the federal government is content with ignoring them, the states are going to treat them like their other taxpayers.

Your neice's roommate's parents don't pay taxes to Colorado. Not sure how they fit in here.

ding ding ding

go ahead and totally sidestep the issue that the roommate is an illegal and should not even be in the country in the first place nor should she be getting better treatment than a kid whos parents that happen to be serving in the US armed forces.

What does serving the the military have to do with anything? :confused: That is an emotional argument, and it is irrelevant.

Hey, I'm with you on illegal immigration. But unlike you I'm not a Mexican-hating xenophobe. If the government wants Mexicans to come here and work for cheap because they think they help our economy, then they should remove the barriers that prevent most Mexicans from coming here legally.

In the meantime, they're here. And if they want to educate themselves, I think that's a good thing.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Zolty
Originally posted by: Savij
I would like to focus on the borders first. Status quo or let local/state handle the deporting of current illegals Can we at least stop the new ones from coming in? Fix the leak first or we'll be bailing water for a looong time.

If you can think of a cost effective solution with out inducing a police state then I would love to hear it.

Very simple....we have thousands of non-violent criminals in our prison system that need to be "rehabilitated". To most bleeding hearts such as the ACLU that simply means having them sit around in circles singing Kumbaya and crying over the fact that they are addicts and have nothing to show for their wasted lives....FVCK THAT!!!

You wanna rehabilitate them?...put them to work. Have them build a wall across our border...not some flimsy bullsh!t chain link fence, I mean something like what the Soviets did in Germany, or what the Chinese did thousands of years ago.

A quality fence made of concrete, block, steel and razor wire can do wonders. We have technology to build bridges that span incredible distances....surely we can build a fence that is deep enough and tall enough that unless you are Spiderman or have the capability to burrow hundreds of feet underground, you are not getting in.

This is beneficial in several ways:
#1 cost...you don't have to pay a felon more than a few cents a day
#2 they will get rehabilitated
#3 they learn a trade that they can use anywhere there is construction going on...who knows, you may end up with a few good engineers out of it.

Yes, the Berlin wall...there was a shining monument to the human spirit.

it is not about spirit, it is about protecting what is ours....do you just let any stranger stroll right into your house and eat your food? Use your electricity? Your water? Your gas?....if you do let me know where you live...I'll be right over with a few friends and we'll have one hell of a party on your dime.

Your metaphor, once again doesn't work. The vast majority of these people are not "eating for free" and would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them.

Yes his metaphor does work. If this were the SAT's, he'd get a point for selecting the right answer. I seriously doubt that we'd have as many illegal immigrants in this country if they didn't have the economic incentives that they currently enjoy.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state.
A hell of a lot less than they take out in social services and since most are paid in cash anyway and send a lot of their cash south, it's not like they're buying lots of tvs at bestbuy.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state.
A hell of a lot less than they take out in social services and since most are paid in cash anyway and send a lot of their cash south, it's not like they're buying lots of tvs at bestbuy.

people easily forget the "a dollar is spent 7 ways" rule.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Zolty
Originally posted by: Savij
I would like to focus on the borders first. Status quo or let local/state handle the deporting of current illegals Can we at least stop the new ones from coming in? Fix the leak first or we'll be bailing water for a looong time.

If you can think of a cost effective solution with out inducing a police state then I would love to hear it.

Very simple....we have thousands of non-violent criminals in our prison system that need to be "rehabilitated". To most bleeding hearts such as the ACLU that simply means having them sit around in circles singing Kumbaya and crying over the fact that they are addicts and have nothing to show for their wasted lives....FVCK THAT!!!

You wanna rehabilitate them?...put them to work. Have them build a wall across our border...not some flimsy bullsh!t chain link fence, I mean something like what the Soviets did in Germany, or what the Chinese did thousands of years ago.

A quality fence made of concrete, block, steel and razor wire can do wonders. We have technology to build bridges that span incredible distances....surely we can build a fence that is deep enough and tall enough that unless you are Spiderman or have the capability to burrow hundreds of feet underground, you are not getting in.

This is beneficial in several ways:
#1 cost...you don't have to pay a felon more than a few cents a day
#2 they will get rehabilitated
#3 they learn a trade that they can use anywhere there is construction going on...who knows, you may end up with a few good engineers out of it.

Yes, the Berlin wall...there was a shining monument to the human spirit.

it is not about spirit, it is about protecting what is ours....do you just let any stranger stroll right into your house and eat your food? Use your electricity? Your water? Your gas?....if you do let me know where you live...I'll be right over with a few friends and we'll have one hell of a party on your dime.

Your metaphor, once again doesn't work. The vast majority of these people are not "eating for free" and would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them.

Yes his metaphor does work. If this were the SAT's, he'd get a point for selecting the right answer. I seriously doubt that we'd have as many illegal immigrants in this country if they didn't have the economic incentives that they currently enjoy.

Which economic incentives are you, specifically referring to?
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: mugs
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state. As long as the federal government is content with ignoring them, the states are going to treat them like their other taxpayers.

Your neice's roommate's parents don't pay taxes to Colorado. Not sure how they fit in here.

ding ding ding

go ahead and totally sidestep the issue that the roommate is an illegal and should not even be in the country in the first place nor should she be getting better treatment than a kid whos parents that happen to be serving in the US armed forces.

What does serving the the military have to do with anything? :confused: That is an emotional argument, and it is irrelevant.

Hey, I'm with you on illegal immigration. But unlike you I'm not a Mexican-hating xenophobe. If the government wants Mexicans to come here and work for cheap because they think they help our economy, then they should remove the barriers that prevent most Mexicans from coming here legally.

In the meantime, they're here. And if they want to educate themselves, I think that's a good thing.

I am not a Mexican hating xenophobe. The whole cheap labor argument is crap. its corporations who want the cheap labor for bigger profits and it is hurting our economy a whole lot more than helping it. those cheap labors do not get paid a livable wage, they are not stimulating our economy by buying new cars, new appliances, a new HDTV. they are sending that money back to Mexico by the billions. having a healthy economy is having workers getting paid a livable wage where they can buy stuff that contribute to a local/state sales tax and transfers the money to a business to pay their workers. I really can not fathom how you can say cheap labor is good for our economy. :roll:
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Zolty
Originally posted by: Savij
I would like to focus on the borders first. Status quo or let local/state handle the deporting of current illegals Can we at least stop the new ones from coming in? Fix the leak first or we'll be bailing water for a looong time.

If you can think of a cost effective solution with out inducing a police state then I would love to hear it.

Very simple....we have thousands of non-violent criminals in our prison system that need to be "rehabilitated". To most bleeding hearts such as the ACLU that simply means having them sit around in circles singing Kumbaya and crying over the fact that they are addicts and have nothing to show for their wasted lives....FVCK THAT!!!

You wanna rehabilitate them?...put them to work. Have them build a wall across our border...not some flimsy bullsh!t chain link fence, I mean something like what the Soviets did in Germany, or what the Chinese did thousands of years ago.

A quality fence made of concrete, block, steel and razor wire can do wonders. We have technology to build bridges that span incredible distances....surely we can build a fence that is deep enough and tall enough that unless you are Spiderman or have the capability to burrow hundreds of feet underground, you are not getting in.

This is beneficial in several ways:
#1 cost...you don't have to pay a felon more than a few cents a day
#2 they will get rehabilitated
#3 they learn a trade that they can use anywhere there is construction going on...who knows, you may end up with a few good engineers out of it.

Yes, the Berlin wall...there was a shining monument to the human spirit.

it is not about spirit, it is about protecting what is ours....do you just let any stranger stroll right into your house and eat your food? Use your electricity? Your water? Your gas?....if you do let me know where you live...I'll be right over with a few friends and we'll have one hell of a party on your dime.

Your metaphor, once again doesn't work. The vast majority of these people are not "eating for free" and would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them.

Yes his metaphor does work. If this were the SAT's, he'd get a point for selecting the right answer. I seriously doubt that we'd have as many illegal immigrants in this country if they didn't have the economic incentives that they currently enjoy.

Which economic incentives are you, specifically referring to?

The ones that you refer to when you say that they'd be perfectly willing to pay their way if they were allowed to. I suppose that to mean pay taxes, pay social security, pay for health care, pay for emergency services, pay for roads, etc. You know, those things that we the legal citizens pay for and reap the benefits of.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Well if they live in-state that is no big deal. If they are receiving Federal Financial Aid that might be an issue of fraud depending on the rules from the FEDS. What the state wants to do is up to the state. If you want to protest, dont go to school there.

At any large university or college, you can expect to see people from outside of the United States. So it is hard to say what is fair and what is not fair. How come you could not go to a College or University in your own state?
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,810
1,991
126
Originally posted by: Darthvoy
I agree, but the problem we have is that we have to find a middle ground, but at the moment neither side willing to compromise one bit. At one point we have look at the situation without letting whatever emotion we may have about it and find a solution that will solve the problem, otherwise things will stay as they are and get worse.
12 million isn't a middle ground? That's more than 10% of Mexico's population.

 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
An Illegal Alien hit and ran and killed an American citizen here in Arizona. Tax dollars should not go to pay for childern who are here not by their choice, but by their parents illegal entry into this country. They can still get an education, the only thing is that they have to pay out of state tuition.
 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
Illegal immigration drives wages down when employers can pay people less and get away with it they will.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Berlin wall was built to keep people in. A fence at the Mexican border keeps illegal aliens, coyotes, drug-runners, terrorists, and others out.

In/out is semantics. There are two sides to a wall. Whichever you label 'in' and 'out' is arbitrary.

For example, you could say the wall would be to keep Mexicans 'in' Mexico.

The Berlin wall was built by the Soviets around West Berlin to keep the people living in East Germany 'out' of the West-controlled part of the city. Or 'in' the east. Whichever way you want to say it.
 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Zolty
Originally posted by: Savij
I would like to focus on the borders first. Status quo or let local/state handle the deporting of current illegals Can we at least stop the new ones from coming in? Fix the leak first or we'll be bailing water for a looong time.

If you can think of a cost effective solution with out inducing a police state then I would love to hear it.

Very simple....we have thousands of non-violent criminals in our prison system that need to be "rehabilitated". To most bleeding hearts such as the ACLU that simply means having them sit around in circles singing Kumbaya and crying over the fact that they are addicts and have nothing to show for their wasted lives....FVCK THAT!!!

You wanna rehabilitate them?...put them to work. Have them build a wall across our border...not some flimsy bullsh!t chain link fence, I mean something like what the Soviets did in Germany, or what the Chinese did thousands of years ago.

A quality fence made of concrete, block, steel and razor wire can do wonders. We have technology to build bridges that span incredible distances....surely we can build a fence that is deep enough and tall enough that unless you are Spiderman or have the capability to burrow hundreds of feet underground, you are not getting in.

This is beneficial in several ways:
#1 cost...you don't have to pay a felon more than a few cents a day
#2 they will get rehabilitated
#3 they learn a trade that they can use anywhere there is construction going on...who knows, you may end up with a few good engineers out of it.

Yes, the Berlin wall...there was a shining monument to the human spirit.

it is not about spirit, it is about protecting what is ours....do you just let any stranger stroll right into your house and eat your food? Use your electricity? Your water? Your gas?....if you do let me know where you live...I'll be right over with a few friends and we'll have one hell of a party on your dime.

Your metaphor, once again doesn't work. The vast majority of these people are not "eating for free" and would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them.

Well, see my metaphor is dead on...you just don't see it yet.

You are right, illegals are not "eating for free"...they are eating on the dime of other people....much like the party goers I would bring to your home.


According to you : would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them....really now,...you're sure about that?

How is that so when:

#1- there is a great opportunity for them to do this through the legal means to get here, but they choose not to follow the proper guidelines to get into this country legally?

#2- how do you explain all the illegal gang members in this country...isn't that kind of an oxymoron?.....you say they want to be here legally, and pay their own way, yet when they cross our border illegally...they join gangs and partake in illegal activities....doesn't sound like someone that wants to be on the up and up does it?

#3- They come here because it is the path of least resistance...it is much easier for them to come to this country where everything from the S.S. system, welfare system and all the other opportunities are offered for them to take advantage, then it is for them to stay in their own country and make it better than what it is for themselves and their children.

You don't see any one from this country trying to illegally sneak into Mexico now do you? Why do you suppose that is?

It's because their infrastructure sucks...instead of staying there and trying to fix it over the past several hundred years, they would rather sneak into this country where they can take advantage of all that we have to offer and everything else that is already established, all they have to do is be able bodied enough to stroll across the border.

 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Citrix
her roommate is from out of state with both parents in the air force serving in Germany, she has to pay out-of-state tuition, while the illegals get instate tuition at CU.

this really pisses me off. :|

Is the "illegal" student, or their parents, a resident of Colorado?

How does this work, does CO grant all out-of-state illegals in-state tuition?

Why would foreigners, whether legal or illegal residents in the US, receive better treatment than US citizens from CO?

Why would the taxpayers of CO want to subsize the education of foreigners?

This sounds kinda nutty to me.

Fern
 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
1. Introduce federal ID cards with biometric information encoded into it.
2. Develop system so employers can verify legal status of all applicants.
3. Shut down businesses that knowingly employ illegals, and confiscate all their assets.
4. Create seasonal work permits for workers wanting to do farm work.
5. Accept that prices on some services will go up, since we'll have to pay a fair wage for said services.
6. Any illegals here now with kids born here stay, barring a criminal record. Any new illegals that come here to have kids will be thrown out, along with their kids.
7. Deport anyone caught that is illegal immediately. No hearings, no lawyers.
Heavily militarize the border.
8. Problem solved.

excellent, Mxylplyx
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Well, see my metaphor is dead on...you just don't see it yet.

You are right, illegals are not "eating for free"...they are eating on the dime of other people....much like the party goers I would bring to your home.


According to you : would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them....really now,...you're sure about that?
If they came here legally (i.e. if we fix the system) and refused to pay their taxes, then we can deport them
How is that so when:

#1- there is a great opportunity for them to do this through the legal means to get here, but they choose not to follow the proper guidelines to get into this country legally?
Not true at all, every year, the quota is filled within minutes of it opening.
#2- how do you explain all the illegal gang members in this country...isn't that kind of an oxymoron?.....you say they want to be here legally, and pay their own way, yet when they cross our border illegally...they join gangs and partake in illegal activities....doesn't sound like someone that wants to be on the up and up does it?
Show me some statistics that illegal immigrants commit crimes not related to their citizenship status at a higher per capita rate than other people of similar socio-economic status. I suspect you'll them at or below the average. Even if not, putting people on the wrong side of the law to start certainly makes it less of a leap to fall in with criminal elements.
#3- They come here because it is the path of least resistance...it is much easier for them to come to this country where everything from the S.S. system, welfare system and all the other opportunities are offered for them to take advantage, then it is for them to stay in their own country and make it better than what it is for themselves and their children.

You don't see any one from this country trying to illegally sneak into Mexico now do you? Why do you suppose that is?
this is a red herring, it's not directly related to the question of justification for illegal immigration.
It's because their infrastructure sucks...instead of staying there and trying to fix it over the past several hundred years, they would rather sneak into this country where they can take advantage of all that we have to offer and everything else that is already established, all they have to do is be able bodied enough to stroll across the border.

 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Rustler
1. Introduce federal ID cards with biometric information encoded into it.
2. Develop system so employers can verify legal status of all applicants.
3. Shut down businesses that knowingly employ illegals, and confiscate all their assets.
4. Create seasonal work permits for workers wanting to do farm work.
5. Accept that prices on some services will go up, since we'll have to pay a fair wage for said services.
6. Any illegals here now with kids born here stay, barring a criminal record. Any new illegals that come here to have kids will be thrown out, along with their kids.
7. Deport anyone caught that is illegal immediately. No hearings, no lawyers.
Heavily militarize the border.
8. Problem solved.

excellent, Mxylplyx

Do you people actually believe that such a massive expansion of government power is worth it to stop people from getting into the country? How can anyone possibly think whatever meager economic benefit they imagine from ease of burden on social programs will outweigh the costs and non financial negatives of the crap?
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Rustler
1. Introduce federal ID cards with biometric information encoded into it.
2. Develop system so employers can verify legal status of all applicants.
3. Shut down businesses that knowingly employ illegals, and confiscate all their assets.
4. Create seasonal work permits for workers wanting to do farm work.
5. Accept that prices on some services will go up, since we'll have to pay a fair wage for said services.
6. Any illegals here now with kids born here stay, barring a criminal record. Any new illegals that come here to have kids will be thrown out, along with their kids.
7. Deport anyone caught that is illegal immediately. No hearings, no lawyers.
Heavily militarize the border.
8. Problem solved.

excellent, Mxylplyx

Do you people actually believe that such a massive expansion of government power is worth it to stop people from getting into the country? How can anyone possibly think whatever meager economic benefit they imagine from ease of burden on social programs will outweigh the costs and non financial negatives of the crap?

Who's to decide what is meager? Pro illegals think no wrongs can be done by illegals, more the better. Anti Illegals disagree.

I don't think expansion of too much government is good either. But we don't need that. If we just put National guards along the border with blackhawks, UAV, some heavy firepower to fight Mexican wild drug lords, it'd done a whole lot already.

And yes, get rid of anchor baby clause, and jail employers who hired Illegals. That would make a big difference.

 

Darthvoy

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2004
1,825
1
0
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Darthvoy
I agree, but the problem we have is that we have to find a middle ground, but at the moment neither side willing to compromise one bit. At one point we have look at the situation without letting whatever emotion we may have about it and find a solution that will solve the problem, otherwise things will stay as they are and get worse.
12 million isn't a middle ground? That's more than 10% of Mexico's population.

I understand your frustration. I know based on experience that if the people coming here illegally had the means to do things legally, which weren't too unreasonable, they would do it. Heck, I even know people who became legal and are happy to pay taxes. They see it as their contribution to a country that has given them great opportunities. No one likes to live in the shadows and in fear of being reported.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: mugs
Illegals work and pay taxes to the state. As long as the federal government is content with ignoring them, the states are going to treat them like their other taxpayers.

Your neice's roommate's parents don't pay taxes to Colorado. Not sure how they fit in here.

ding ding ding

go ahead and totally sidestep the issue that the roommate is an illegal and should not even be in the country in the first place nor should she be getting better treatment than a kid whos parents that happen to be serving in the US armed forces.

What does serving the the military have to do with anything? :confused: That is an emotional argument, and it is irrelevant.

Hey, I'm with you on illegal immigration. But unlike you I'm not a Mexican-hating xenophobe. If the government wants Mexicans to come here and work for cheap because they think they help our economy, then they should remove the barriers that prevent most Mexicans from coming here legally.

In the meantime, they're here. And if they want to educate themselves, I think that's a good thing.

I am not a Mexican hating xenophobe.

Yeah, you really are. You have made many posts about this stuff, and they have NOT been limited to illegal immigration. I recall Mill thoroughly owning you in one thread where you were bitching about sample ballots in Spanish or something like that. That had nothing to do with illegal immigration as Mill explained to you, but you couldn't see past your blinding hatred of people whose names end with a 'z'.

The whole cheap labor argument is crap. its corporations who want the cheap labor for bigger profits and it is hurting our economy a whole lot more than helping it. those cheap labors do not get paid a livable wage, they are not stimulating our economy by buying new cars, new appliances, a new HDTV. they are sending that money back to Mexico by the billions. having a healthy economy is having workers getting paid a livable wage where they can buy stuff that contribute to a local/state sales tax and transfers the money to a business to pay their workers. I really can not fathom how you can say cheap labor is good for our economy. :roll:

Please show me where in my post that I indicated my opinion on whether Mexican labor benefits or hurts the economy. Oh that's right, I didn't. :roll: Regarding how much money they send back to Mexico - that pales in comparison to how much Walmart shoppers are sending to China. We import shitty electronics from China, and we import landscapers and housekeepers and drywallers from Mexico.
 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Well, see my metaphor is dead on...you just don't see it yet.

You are right, illegals are not "eating for free"...they are eating on the dime of other people....much like the party goers I would bring to your home.


According to you : would be perfectly happy to pay their way if it was allowed to them....really now,...you're sure about that?
If they came here legally (i.e. if we fix the system) and refused to pay their taxes, then we can deport them
How is that so when:

#1- there is a great opportunity for them to do this through the legal means to get here, but they choose not to follow the proper guidelines to get into this country legally?
Not true at all, every year, the quota is filled within minutes of it opening.
#2- how do you explain all the illegal gang members in this country...isn't that kind of an oxymoron?.....you say they want to be here legally, and pay their own way, yet when they cross our border illegally...they join gangs and partake in illegal activities....doesn't sound like someone that wants to be on the up and up does it?
Show me some statistics that illegal immigrants commit crimes not related to their citizenship status at a higher per capita rate than other people of similar socio-economic status. I suspect you'll them at or below the average. Even if not, putting people on the wrong side of the law to start certainly makes it less of a leap to fall in with criminal elements.
#3- They come here because it is the path of least resistance...it is much easier for them to come to this country where everything from the S.S. system, welfare system and all the other opportunities are offered for them to take advantage, then it is for them to stay in their own country and make it better than what it is for themselves and their children.

You don't see any one from this country trying to illegally sneak into Mexico now do you? Why do you suppose that is?
this is a red herring, it's not directly related to the question of justification for illegal immigration.
It's because their infrastructure sucks...instead of staying there and trying to fix it over the past several hundred years, they would rather sneak into this country where they can take advantage of all that we have to offer and everything else that is already established, all they have to do is be able bodied enough to stroll across the border.

#1-so your answer to the problem is to just have an open boarder policy...after all, anyone that wants in should be let in...is that your idea? Just open the floodgates and let them all come over and as soon as their feet hit American soil *poof* they are American citizens?

Why the hell should we?...if you were not fortunate enough to be born in this country and be an American citizen.....sorry about your luck. Perhaps the next time around you might get lucky be born to someone like Donald Trump. Your unfortunate life is not something I necessarily want to pay for...much like everyone else in the world I have my own problems to deal with and if I am going to give my money away to anyone it will be my family and friends...not someone who broke the law to get here in the first place.

#2- All you need to do it look at the prison system to see the number of illegals that are incarcerated.

#3- So...you are trying to justify the whole illegal immigration thing...is that what I am getting from this? Nice.

My original post was to answer the question about how we could cost effectively secure our borders. The government seems to think some kind if high-tech wonder fence is the answer....that will cost several million dollars.

My way is much cheaper and serves several purposes. We have a right to secure our border......just because there are people in a country that is south of us that have the unfortunate luck of the draw to be born into a country that cares nothing about them and they refuse to do anything about it, does not negate the fact that we can and should exercise the right to secure our territory.

You lock the door to your home do you not? Why should this be any different?
 

PieIsAwesome

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2007
4,054
1
0
Niece lives out of state, so she pays out of state.

Said illegal lives in-state, so she pays in-state.

How is the illegal getting more benefits than a citizen?
 

Rustler

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2004
1,253
1
81
Being an illegal means that you would not be a citizen of the USA or resident of the state that he/she is in so if they are getting instate tuition then they are recieving cheaper schooling. Arizona voted prop 300 which denies any public assistance to illegal aliens.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Wheezer
#1-so your answer to the problem is to just have an open boarder policy...after all, anyone that wants in should be let in...is that your idea? Just open the floodgates and let them all come over and as soon as their feet hit American soil *poof* they are American citizens?
No, that isn't how it works. Citizenship != Residency. You think everyone whoe went through ellis island was a citizen? No, they were just legal residents.
Why the hell should we?...if you were not fortunate enough to be born in this country and be an American citizen.....sorry about your luck. Perhaps the next time around you might get lucky be born to someone like Donald Trump. Your unfortunate life is not something I necessarily want to pay for...much like everyone else in the world I have my own problems to deal with and if I am going to give my money away to anyone it will be my family and friends...not someone who broke the law to get here in the first place.
You keep saying "broke the law", but these people aren't criminals in any real sense, as much as you want to justify your anti-immigrant stance by it. The fact is, cheap labor benefits all of us. Yes, there is some point where we are overpopulated, but it is a much higher number than our current 300 million.
#2- All you need to do it look at the prison system to see the number of illegals that are incarcerated.
That's still not an answer. Unless and until I see real data showing that mexican immigrants are statistically more likely to commit crimes than others of some social status, and you've factored out the effect of making them criminals by default for comig here, then I'll change my position. Until then, calling them all criminals is basically bigoted. I hate to play that card, but that's what it boils down to.
#3- So...you are trying to justify the whole illegal immigration thing...is that what I am getting from this? Nice.
This isn't an actual argument. Yes, I feel that our immigration policy is wholly irrational.
My original post was to answer the question about how we could cost effectively secure our borders. The government seems to think some kind if high-tech wonder fence is the answer....that will cost several million dollars.

My way is much cheaper and serves several purposes. We have a right to secure our border......just because there are people in a country that is south of us that have the unfortunate luck of the draw to be born into a country that cares nothing about them and they refuse to do anything about it, does not negate the fact that we can and should exercise the right to secure our territory.

You lock the door to your home do you not? Why should this be any different?
Youkeep jumping to this silly "house" metaphor. It makes no sense. A nation is fundamentally a different beast from a single family residence. You can't make national policy based on such spurious reasoning.