Initially, I wanted to get an iRiver, just waiting on a deal.
Well, Friday, I saw a hot deal online on a 4g 20GB iPod that I couldn't pass up,
so I ordered that.
Waiting for it to come in, I was wondering if I made a mistake and should of gotten an iRiver ihp-120.
As luck would have it, I saw one in Best Buy on Monday open box for super cheap. I decided to
get it, too, since there wouldn't be any restocking fee if I returned it and it looked mint (no accesories were opened and not even any prints on the player)
Been messing around with the iRiver for the last couple days.
First impression, not real great. Looks are decent, kinda cheesy funky though like those newer
boomboxes in Circuit City, plus it rattled a bit from all the buttons, just moving it
around in your hand. Navigation and file browsing really sucks on it. The joystick
feels very cheap. Navigation is by a Windows Explorer type folder structure that is
practically useless since it only shows like half of each filename. Sound quality was good.
I only used RCA out to my stereo, not headphones. I'll probably rarely ever use phones since
I'll be hooking up to my car. The remote was kinda cool, but is should have shown Artist/Song instead of
Folder/Song. Overall, I wasn't super impressed.
Ipod came in today. First impression, sweet! Very nice looking and totally solid. No rattling and a nice
minimalist look. Navigation by the click wheel was very fluid and easy. Menu File system was great, equally fluid. I do realize however, this was due to iTunes and navigation relies on id3 tags. Unfortunately, no drag and drop from the PC. On the other hand, the iriver did have drag and drop, but navigation was still by file names, not id3 tags, unless you installed their software. I decided to do that to make comparisons fair. Basically, the iriver software was useless. It wouldn't recognize id3 tags on many albums I had that the ipod had no problem with. I later realized there is a 52 character path/file name limit, otherwise id3 tags cannot be read. Even with the few albums it did recognize, navigation with the database was still pretty bad.
So far, ipod was winning. But the main test was still ahead, a head to head sound test. From what I read on the internet, it didn't look good for the ipod, but all other reviews were using headphones . Again this was by RCA straight into my Yamaha rX-1200 with Axiom M-22ti mains. A pretty decent, and nicely accurate set up. Like I said before, the iriver sounded pretty good. Actually, the line out sounded pretty good. The headphone jack sounded fairly worse. However, the line out wasn't even truly line out since it was still controlled by the volume setting, not bypassing the circuitry. Anyways, believe or not, the ipod sound just as good, if not better. Very accurate, and a slightly better soundfield. I read complaints that it didn't have enough bass. For me, it was just right. The iriver line out was a tad deeper, but compared to an original CD, the ipod sounded more like the original song.
Thats it, ipod for me. Regardless of the hype and marketing, I honestly think it is a better MP3 player. I realize the iriver records and plays other file types like OGG and WMA. However, I'll never use the record feature, and I want an MP3 player, not some other file type. All my music is already in MP3 and if I really need loseless, I'll use apple's format. Guess I'm gonna return the iriver now.
Just a little mini take on both players for those interested.
Well, Friday, I saw a hot deal online on a 4g 20GB iPod that I couldn't pass up,
so I ordered that.
Waiting for it to come in, I was wondering if I made a mistake and should of gotten an iRiver ihp-120.
As luck would have it, I saw one in Best Buy on Monday open box for super cheap. I decided to
get it, too, since there wouldn't be any restocking fee if I returned it and it looked mint (no accesories were opened and not even any prints on the player)
Been messing around with the iRiver for the last couple days.
First impression, not real great. Looks are decent, kinda cheesy funky though like those newer
boomboxes in Circuit City, plus it rattled a bit from all the buttons, just moving it
around in your hand. Navigation and file browsing really sucks on it. The joystick
feels very cheap. Navigation is by a Windows Explorer type folder structure that is
practically useless since it only shows like half of each filename. Sound quality was good.
I only used RCA out to my stereo, not headphones. I'll probably rarely ever use phones since
I'll be hooking up to my car. The remote was kinda cool, but is should have shown Artist/Song instead of
Folder/Song. Overall, I wasn't super impressed.
Ipod came in today. First impression, sweet! Very nice looking and totally solid. No rattling and a nice
minimalist look. Navigation by the click wheel was very fluid and easy. Menu File system was great, equally fluid. I do realize however, this was due to iTunes and navigation relies on id3 tags. Unfortunately, no drag and drop from the PC. On the other hand, the iriver did have drag and drop, but navigation was still by file names, not id3 tags, unless you installed their software. I decided to do that to make comparisons fair. Basically, the iriver software was useless. It wouldn't recognize id3 tags on many albums I had that the ipod had no problem with. I later realized there is a 52 character path/file name limit, otherwise id3 tags cannot be read. Even with the few albums it did recognize, navigation with the database was still pretty bad.
So far, ipod was winning. But the main test was still ahead, a head to head sound test. From what I read on the internet, it didn't look good for the ipod, but all other reviews were using headphones . Again this was by RCA straight into my Yamaha rX-1200 with Axiom M-22ti mains. A pretty decent, and nicely accurate set up. Like I said before, the iriver sounded pretty good. Actually, the line out sounded pretty good. The headphone jack sounded fairly worse. However, the line out wasn't even truly line out since it was still controlled by the volume setting, not bypassing the circuitry. Anyways, believe or not, the ipod sound just as good, if not better. Very accurate, and a slightly better soundfield. I read complaints that it didn't have enough bass. For me, it was just right. The iriver line out was a tad deeper, but compared to an original CD, the ipod sounded more like the original song.
Thats it, ipod for me. Regardless of the hype and marketing, I honestly think it is a better MP3 player. I realize the iriver records and plays other file types like OGG and WMA. However, I'll never use the record feature, and I want an MP3 player, not some other file type. All my music is already in MP3 and if I really need loseless, I'll use apple's format. Guess I'm gonna return the iriver now.
Just a little mini take on both players for those interested.