AtenRa
Lifer
- Feb 2, 2009
- 14,001
- 3,357
- 136
2.This you can do on any CPU,in fact why don't YOU do that whenever you are testing things?
Lower IQ settings that directly affect CPU performance ??? why would i need to do that on my tests ???
2.This you can do on any CPU,in fact why don't YOU do that whenever you are testing things?
With the locked multiplier, it's extremely limited. For the extra cost of the better motherboard, the money is probably better spent on just getting the unlocked i5.
With the locked multiplier, it's extremely limited. For the extra cost of the better motherboard, the money is probably better spent on just getting
+..00+nlocked i5.
Yes, 4.68Ghz, very limited.
That Supermicro C7H170-M board cost $240
Yeah -- and for the price of that $240 motherboard.... A wise consumer would have instead purchased an i7 and outperformed it at stock clock speed. Saving money by purchasing a locked chip and then buying a motherboard roughly 5 times the cost of a standard motherboard (to overclock a locked i3) is the definition of lunacy.
You are both too desperate to nitpick. The point is you can OC any non K on any board as long as there is BIOS support for BCLK change. And you can OC quite a lot.
You are both too desperate to nitpick. The point is you can OC any non K on any board as long as there is BIOS support for BCLK change. And you can OC quite a lot.
I think OCing a locked i3 is a very intriguing concept. There are now sub-$100 Z170 boards out there that would make such a project an affordable and pretty cool introduction to overclocking.
Yeah, sure.... Whatever you say. It's about as exciting as overclocking a desktop Kabini. And the results are similarly futile IMO -- the majority of overclockers would focus on using better chips to start with (not dual cores).
You are bragging about an 800 Mhz overclock on an insanely expensive motherboard.... When most FX 8320e chips can overclock twice that amount on cheap $99 motherboards (Anandtech's review took the 3.2 Ghz chip up to 4.8 Ghz).
So low-budget overclocking only matters when it comes to AMD?
Sorry but you're contradicting yourself.
Yeah, sure.... Whatever you say. It's about as exciting as overclocking a desktop Kabini. And the results are similarly futile IMO -- the majority of overclockers would focus on using better chips to start with (not dual cores).
No, I'm not. If you are an overclocker -- don't buy a locked chip. That's pretty consistent. If you want to do an Intel overclocking build on the cheap, then go buy a G3258 if you must.
But Intel's budget overclocking options quite frankly suck. An unlocked i3 is way overdue. You really need to spend i5 money to have a decent overclocker with sufficient threads for
modern gaming.
That Supermicro C7H170-M board cost $240
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...555&cm_re=C7H170-M-_-9SIA5EM3E71555-_-Product
HD530 of Skylake hangs in there pretty good now.
As always with an igp, the system ram has a big effect.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/skylake-intel-core-i7-6700k-core-i5-6600k,4252-9.html
Plus look at the difference in IGP performance between the Haswell Core i7 chips and the Core i3 4330 which have the same IGP - so that means the HD530 results for the Core i7 chips are probably a best case scenario. In reality the HD530 in a Core i3 is going to be slower and unless you get an expensive motherboard,you will be limited to much slower RAM speeds.
They are the only review really showing the HD530 in such a good light,even look at the Anandtech review:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9763/the-amd-a8-7670k-apu-review-rocket-league/5
An A8 IGP is much faster than the HD530. The reason the Toms Hardware results look fantastic is since they are running the DDR4 at 3200MHZ which is nearly 50% past the official spec:
http://ark.intel.com/products/88191/Intel-Core-i5-6600K-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_90-GHz
Plus look at the difference in IGP performance between the Haswell Core i7 chips and the Core i3 4330 which have the same IGP - so that means the HD530 results for the Core i7 chips are probably a best case scenario. In reality the HD530 in a Core i3 is going to be slower and unless you get an expensive motherboard,you will be limited to much slower RAM speeds.
You only look at one of the very few reviews which have actually compared the Core i3 6100 to the A10 7870K:
http://www.clubedohardware.com.br/artigos/teste-dos-processadores-a10-7870k-vs-core-i3-6100/3192/8
The HD530 IGP is still much slower overall.
And there go the goalposts again.
First you said it couldn't be done. You were proven wrong, but now the goalposts get moved to price. Where will you move them to when somebody posts about a cheap board with overclocking support for i3?
With the locked multiplier, it's extremely limited. For the extra cost of the better motherboard, the money is probably better spent on just getting the unlocked i5.
We are not talking about all the boards, we are talking specifically about that particular $240 SuperMicro board that a single guy have managed to OC the Core i3 and he doesnt even say how he did it. And then ShintaiDK calls us desperate and you are talking about goalposts when the original context was about "extremely limited" and "extra cost" ??You are both too desperate to nitpick. The point is you can OC any non K on any board as long as there is BIOS support for BCLK change. And you can OC quite a lot.
FWIW, I think Intel really ought to make an unlocked i3. They're just leaving money on the table.
I would prefer to unlock BCLK for every board.
Yeah we all would but that would make "K" series SKUs kinda pointless, though.