But that same thing can be said for all the things the left wants to do. If I drink multiple Big Gulp Mountain Dews and eat multiple bacon cheeseburgers and get grossly overweight, society suffers the costs as much as do I. Same with alcohol or tobacco - what real societal benefits do they have compared to their very real societal costs? Move down the line to violent video games or movies; there are real societal costs, but no offsetting societal benefits. Often they are even the same societal costs; if I spend all my money on hookers and blow, I'm just as broke as if I put it all on red and lost (plus I'm addicted and probably infected.) Same with video games; some people have literally let their children starve playing them.
Individual liberty is not revenue neutral; people will always choose to do some things that are a net liability to society simply because those things are enjoyable to them. If we are to be free adults, we have to be free to do things that make no sense to other people.
I just love these nebulous terms like "the left" and "the right". I count myself as a mixture of both; so what is it exactly that I, as a sometime member of "the left", want to do?
As far as hookers, blow, video games, gambling, etc., we'd be better off concentrating on people with addictive personalities rather than on the particular substance or behaviour.
As far as Walker's stance on evolution; he's just as clueless as a lot of other Americans. I don't believe in evolution; I accept it as the best explanation of the various forms of life on Earth and how they've adapted to various environments and conditions.
My $.02