Lost_in_the_HTTP
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2019
- 13,246
- 7,854
- 136
We see all these lists of RU equipment losses, but nothing about UKR losses. Are they not taking any or just not listing them?
Sack's was summarizing Simon Shusters Time article, he wasn't adding his own opinions especially in the bullet points that I mentioned. Go read the Time article instead you don't like Sacks. Shuster is/was in Kiev, he was talking to high officials and Zelensky's inner circle of aides. Its not Sack's editorializing that average age of Ukrainian soldiers is 43yrs, US/EU frustration over Ukrainian corruption and people like Shurma still being kept as a close advisor.I’m not sure if you are clear on the definition of an editorial but that is 100% an editorial, and from a guy who is basically the Young Grasshopper of Twitter.
I mean this is the guy who kept lying about how Russia only invaded because Ukraine might join NATO, which is a facially stupid idea.
He was summarizing the article and then adding in his own editorial opinion. That’s why the article is labeled as ‘analysis’, which in the news world is another word for ‘opinion’, although usually analysis is reserved for expert opinion and Sacks has no expertise in this matter.Sack's was summarizing Simon Shusters Time article, he wasn't adding his own opinions especially in the bullet points that I mentioned. Go read the Time article instead you don't like Sacks. Shuster is/was in Kiev, he was talking to high officials and Zelensky's inner circle of aides. Its not Sack's editorializing that average age of Ukrainian soldiers is 43yrs, US/EU frustration over Ukrainian corruption and people like Shurma still being kept as a close advisor.
Seems clear that the RU army simply has orders to attack and no matter if it's at a place they already got absolutely shellacked before.
Usually, adversaries get better at war fighting as the war continues. Russia seems stuck on tried and true means of failure. I suppose I shouldn't expect anything different from a totally corrupt mafia state.Seems clear that the RU army simply has orders to attack and no matter if it's at a place they already got absolutely shellacked before.
Russia has improved dramatically.Usually, adversaries get better at war fighting as the war continues. Russia seems stuck on tried and true means of failure. I suppose I shouldn't expect anything different from a totally corrupt mafia state.
No, its not an editorial from Sacks, Sacks was writing about the Time article. I've linked to both in my earlier post. I've quoted Sack's article because his bullet point format without any spin was helpful.
The Time article was by Shuster and the info he got was directly from Zelensky's inner circle of aides/officials. Ukraine's war is also going quite badly, you cannot dismiss an average age of 43yrs away or scandal ridden Shurma being kept on as a close advisor as Russian propaganda.
Russia has improved dramatically.
They have not (again) waited for the wet season to funnel half their entire forces down a narrow choke point on the way to Kyiv.
They have actually mobilized and deployed the manpower necessary to hold the line across the entire frontline, as opposed to leaving it wide open.
2023 has seen dramatic improvements to Russia's organizational and fighting capability.
There are even reports that the Russian military has started to use drones against the Ukrainian military, as opposed to exclusively using them to bomb cities.
They ARE getting smarter, you just don't see it because of the sheer deficit of where they started.
That, and you think human life has value. Russia absolutely does not. They will expend their "meat" in anyway they see fit, including to simply run Ukraine out of both men and ammo. Russia will use its sheer size over Ukraine in their attempt to win via attrition. Will it work? Time will tell....
Russia has improved dramatically.
They have not (again) waited for the wet season to funnel half their entire forces down a narrow choke point on the way to Kyiv.
They have actually mobilized and deployed the manpower necessary to hold the line across the entire frontline, as opposed to leaving it wide open.
2023 has seen dramatic improvements to Russia's organizational and fighting capability.
There are even reports that the Russian military has started to use drones against the Ukrainian military, as opposed to exclusively using them to bomb cities.
They ARE getting smarter, you just don't see it because of the sheer deficit of where they started.
That, and you think human life has value. Russia absolutely does not. They will expend their "meat" in anyway they see fit, including to simply run Ukraine out of both men and ammo. Russia will use its sheer size over Ukraine in their attempt to win via attrition. Will it work? Time will tell....
Attrition isn't about immediate territorial gains.I agree that human life is inconsequential to Russia, but they have barely made any territorial gains in 2023 while suffering massive equipment losses that they could never hope to replace.
I recall that information being passed around on twitter or reddit. That Russian drones are proving more lethal in the past month or two.Got any dramatic examples?
Attrition isn't about immediate territorial gains.
Those occur after your opponent can no longer resist due to being depleted.
Yet you argue as if you do not know that.
Why, finally the Russian “good secret” army will show up. Can’t you tell from what the Chicken Littles are crying?Precisely.
Considering Russia is currently suffering their worst losses in this war, what do you think will happen to Russia’s already dismal offensive capabilities in the future?
Precisely.
Considering Russia is currently suffering their worst losses in this war, what do you think will happen to Russia’s already dismal offensive capabilities in the future?
NATO had suffered zero losses as they aren’t even in the war. Trust me, if NATO decided to join the war you would know it, as would the Russian solders for the short remainder of their lives.Replace Russia with NATO. They’re the ones who we are reading about in articles about weapon stocks being depleted.
NATO Warns of Ammunition Shortage Due to War in Ukraine
www.voanews.com
![]()
Western ammo stocks at ‘bottom of the barrel’ as Ukraine war drags on, NATO official warns | CNN
Western militaries are running out of ammunition to give to Ukraine, NATO and British officials warned Tuesday, as they urged the bloc’s nations to ramp up production to “keep Ukraine in the fight against Russian invaders.”amp.cnn.com
More mobilizations. More meat waves.Precisely.
Considering Russia is currently suffering their worst losses in this war, what do you think will happen to Russia’s already dismal offensive capabilities in the future?
More mobilizations. More meat waves.
At some point Ukraine runs out of cluster shells, right?
The tech advantages we have provided, have a limited ammo / shelf life, right?
NATO had suffered zero losses as they aren’t even in the war. Trust me, if NATO decided to join the war you would know it, as would the Russian solders for the short remainder of their lives.
NATO isn’t an artillery force - too limited for our purposes. We are an air based artillery force.
NATO lost a 20 year war against an army without a single plane, tank or boat, but we’re supposed to believe they can defeat Russia.
🤡
Replace Russia with NATO. They’re the ones who we are reading about in articles about weapon stocks being depleted.
NATO Warns of Ammunition Shortage Due to War in Ukraine
www.voanews.com
![]()
Western ammo stocks at ‘bottom of the barrel’ as Ukraine war drags on, NATO official warns | CNN
Western militaries are running out of ammunition to give to Ukraine, NATO and British officials warned Tuesday, as they urged the bloc’s nations to ramp up production to “keep Ukraine in the fight against Russian invaders.”amp.cnn.com
NATO lost a 20 year war against an army without a single plane, tank or boat, but we’re supposed to believe they can defeat Russia.
🤡