Puffnstuff
Lifer
- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,025
- 4,795
- 136
A .50 cal with AP will trash a T-34 and its contents.
Flank or rear? Probably no problem for those C44 rounds. Hottest load that comes in .50 I think, big ol chunk of tungsten in there. From the front? Idk.
Would probably go clear through a WW1 tank though, and at this rate we'll be seeing orcs in those soon too.
If the reports on train shipments are true we should send Ukraine some old M72 LAWS to deal with them so they can save the good stuff for meaningful targets.Flank or rear? Probably no problem for those C44 rounds. Hottest load that comes in .50 I think, big ol chunk of tungsten in there. From the front? Idk.
Would probably go clear through a WW1 tank though, and at this rate we'll be seeing orcs in those soon too.
Maybe they're getting deployed from a glider? (as in plane).Some serious drone muscle on those things, artillery shells are a lot heavier than an RPG round. I wonder what kind of range they can get, that's like lifting a small child.
Some serious drone muscle on those things, artillery shells are a lot heavier than an RPG round. I wonder what kind of range they can get, that's like lifting a small child.
They better join forces to pre-emptively strike Russia. That's their best bet to avoid a future invasion.Yeah, all Ru neighbours are arming heavily, Romania and Poland
They appear to be PG-7L HEAT warheads for the RPG-7. Listed weight is just under 6 pounds.
Non NATO countries could do that I guess.They better join forces to pre-emptively strike Russia. That's their best bet to avoid a future invasion.
Nato is a defensive organisation, not a attack one. Plus, if you attack Russia, they, as incompetent as they are, still have nukes. Plus, both countries have major corruption problems, majority coming from russian infiltration, useful idiots and old communists who still have power. So no, attacking Russia is not an option, but being prepared to sting as much as possible, definitely. Actually, in the next 10 years, with the level of arming, Ukraine, Poland and Romania could defeat any conventional russian army (without external help).They better join forces to pre-emptively strike Russia. That's their best bet to avoid a future invasion.
Holy shit!
I might get chastised for this but I wouldn't mind our current Trumpanzees taking a lesson from this woman about Ukraine.
Stirring!Holy shit!
I might get chastised for this but I wouldn't mind our current Trumpanzees taking a lesson from this woman about Ukraine.
She's a far right politician who doesn't have time for the appeasement crap coming from the fascists.A youtube version
During the Italian elections I was afraid she was so far right that she actually was the fascist.She's a far right politician who doesn't have time for the appeasement crap coming from the fascists.
We allowed Putin to save face in 2014 when he took Crimea for Ukraine. Let's not repeat that mistake again.
Less Russian agitprop, more arguments that climate change will actually be a great thing for billions of people.More than that happened. We replaced a Pro-Russian Ukrainian regime with a Pro-American regime that year. Here is a clip of Senator Chris Murphy talking about it on C-SPAN back in 2014:
Here Senator Murphy said we did it for American profit:
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1638195749094563841
This is an argument I understand. America was exerting its power to further its economic interests. However if Russia destabilized and removed the Mexican government in favor of a regime that was more favorable to Moscow economically, I do not think the American government would sit idly by. There is a chance that Putin only took Crimea in response at the time because of his fear of American power. America seems to be considerably weaker now than in 2014 and China seem to be at least as powerful as America economically now. With China backing him, perhaps Putin decided that America lacks the power to stop him. Many bloody wars have started over perceived weakness in ones opponent.
NOTE: As an engineer I have some experience with working with Chinese engineers. The Chinese engineers I worked with were well above average. I think about China having nearly 10 times as many engineering graduates than America each year and I think it really is over. If China has manufacturing and engineering hegemony, they have hegemony. This is why this time in history is so dangerous. Can America cede hegemony to China peacefully or will there be worldwide bloodshed?